Sacroiliac Joint Pain

IF 1.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2011-11-01 DOI:10.1002/9781119968375.CH13
Pascal Vanelderen, Karolina Szadek, S. P. Cohen, J. Witte, Arno Lataster, J. Patijn, Nagy Mekhail, M. V. Kleef, J. V. Zundert
{"title":"Sacroiliac Joint Pain","authors":"Pascal Vanelderen, Karolina Szadek, S. P. Cohen, J. Witte, Arno Lataster, J. Patijn, Nagy Mekhail, M. V. Kleef, J. V. Zundert","doi":"10.1002/9781119968375.CH13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sacroiliac joint pain represents a frequently misdiagnosed cause of low back pain, affecting between 15% and 30% of individuals with mechanical pain below L5. Although a battery of provocation maneuvers can identify most cases of sacroiliac joint pain with reasonable specificity, the reference standard is low-volume blocks, which are associated with a false-positive rate ranging between 10% and 30%. Between 40% and 50% of cases are caused by a specific inciting event, which can include motor vehicle collisions, falls, or more insidious etiologies, such as pregnancy, spinal fusion, and leg length discrepancies. Sacroiliac joint pain may be secondary to both intraarticular and extraarticular pathology, with the latter more likely to be unilateral and affect younger individuals. Both intraarticular and extraarticular steroid blocks have been shown to provide short- to intermediate-term and are sometimes used to select patients for radiofrequency denervation or fusion. Since the lateral branches targeted during denervation innervate the ligaments, those with extraarticular pathology are more likely to benefit. Minimally invasive fusion should be reserved for individuals with dislocation or degeneration with instability who have failed more conservative therapies.","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"57 6","pages":"96-102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119968375.CH13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Sacroiliac joint pain represents a frequently misdiagnosed cause of low back pain, affecting between 15% and 30% of individuals with mechanical pain below L5. Although a battery of provocation maneuvers can identify most cases of sacroiliac joint pain with reasonable specificity, the reference standard is low-volume blocks, which are associated with a false-positive rate ranging between 10% and 30%. Between 40% and 50% of cases are caused by a specific inciting event, which can include motor vehicle collisions, falls, or more insidious etiologies, such as pregnancy, spinal fusion, and leg length discrepancies. Sacroiliac joint pain may be secondary to both intraarticular and extraarticular pathology, with the latter more likely to be unilateral and affect younger individuals. Both intraarticular and extraarticular steroid blocks have been shown to provide short- to intermediate-term and are sometimes used to select patients for radiofrequency denervation or fusion. Since the lateral branches targeted during denervation innervate the ligaments, those with extraarticular pathology are more likely to benefit. Minimally invasive fusion should be reserved for individuals with dislocation or degeneration with instability who have failed more conservative therapies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骶髂关节疼痛
骶髂关节疼痛是腰痛的常见误诊原因,影响15%至30%的L5以下机械性疼痛患者。虽然一系列刺激操作可以以合理的特异性识别大多数骶髂关节疼痛病例,但参考标准是小容量阻滞,其假阳性率在10%至30%之间。40%至50%的病例是由特定的刺激事件引起的,包括机动车碰撞、跌倒或更阴险的病因,如怀孕、脊柱融合和腿长差异。骶髂关节疼痛可能继发于关节内和关节外病理,后者更可能是单侧的,影响年轻人。关节内和关节外类固醇阻滞均可提供短期至中期治疗,有时用于选择患者进行射频去神经支配或融合。由于在去神经支配过程中的侧支目标支配韧带,那些有关节外病理的人更有可能受益。微创融合术应保留给那些有脱位或退变伴不稳定且保守治疗失败的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of the Bouquet Speculum and Traditional Two-Blade Speculum in Medical Student Training for Female Gynecological Exams. Mobile Application for Visualization and Analysis of Impedance Cardiography Signals. Wear of Femoral Head Taper Connections of Contemporary Total Hip Prostheses: An Experimental Study. The Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) for Postural Control Assessment/Training - a Decade of Research. The Performance of Blow-by Method Using Pediatric Non-Rebreathing Mask for Oxygen Delivery During Transport of Pediatric Patients: A Laboratory Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1