下载PDF
{"title":"Similarities and differences in human resource management in the European Union","authors":"Lisbeth Claus","doi":"10.1002/tie.10100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores similarities and differences in human resource management (HRM) in the European\nUnion (EU). Common factors in the development of European HRM are the importance of consultation, the\nemergence of flexible work patterns, the role of work and the employer in the life of employees, and the\nintroduction of the Euro. National, company, and regional factors create divergence in European HRM. National\nfactors include societal hierarchy, different cultures and mental models, societal structure, and language.\nCompany factors include size of companies, public versus private, and multinational or local. Regional factors\ndifferentiate along north-south and east-west axes. The EU had relatively little impact on HRM in\nterms of harmonization of labor and tax laws but had major impact on the opening up of markets to foreign\ncompetition and privatization of public sector companies. While cultural diversity remains strong, the influence\nof large multinational companies may lead to more regional integration in the practice of HRM. European HRM is\nmuch more comfortable operating in a polycentric mode than U.S. HRM, which seeks universality and standardization.\n© 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":47515,"journal":{"name":"Thunderbird International Business Review","volume":"45 6","pages":"729-755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tie.10100","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thunderbird International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tie.10100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40
引用
批量引用
Abstract
This study explores similarities and differences in human resource management (HRM) in the European
Union (EU). Common factors in the development of European HRM are the importance of consultation, the
emergence of flexible work patterns, the role of work and the employer in the life of employees, and the
introduction of the Euro. National, company, and regional factors create divergence in European HRM. National
factors include societal hierarchy, different cultures and mental models, societal structure, and language.
Company factors include size of companies, public versus private, and multinational or local. Regional factors
differentiate along north-south and east-west axes. The EU had relatively little impact on HRM in
terms of harmonization of labor and tax laws but had major impact on the opening up of markets to foreign
competition and privatization of public sector companies. While cultural diversity remains strong, the influence
of large multinational companies may lead to more regional integration in the practice of HRM. European HRM is
much more comfortable operating in a polycentric mode than U.S. HRM, which seeks universality and standardization.
© 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
欧盟人力资源管理的异同
本研究探讨欧盟(EU)人力资源管理(HRM)的异同。欧洲人力资源管理发展的共同因素是咨询的重要性,灵活工作模式的出现,工作和雇主在员工生活中的作用,以及欧元的引入。国家、公司和地区因素造成了欧洲人力资源管理的差异。民族因素包括社会等级、不同的文化和心理模式、社会结构和语言。公司因素包括公司规模、上市公司与私营公司、跨国公司或本地公司。区域因子沿南北轴线和东西轴线分化。欧盟对人力资源管理在劳动和税法的协调方面的影响相对较小,但对向外国竞争开放市场和公共部门公司私有化有重大影响。虽然文化多样性仍然很强,但大型跨国公司的影响可能会导致人力资源管理实践中更多的区域整合。与追求普遍性和标准化的美国人力资源管理相比,欧洲人力资源管理在多中心模式下运行得更加舒适。©2003 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。