Tensions in current curriculum reform and the development of teachers’ professional autonomy

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Curriculum Journal Pub Date : 2020-01-19 DOI:10.1002/curj.25
Sioned V. Hughes, H. Lewis
{"title":"Tensions in current curriculum reform and the development of teachers’ professional autonomy","authors":"Sioned V. Hughes, H. Lewis","doi":"10.1002/curj.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current curriculum reform in Wales provides an opportunity for teachers to have greater freedom to develop pedagogical approaches that meet the needs of their pupils. The Successful Futures report (Donaldson, 2015) recommends that teachers should have a greater autonomy in choosing how to deliver the curriculum, and ensuring it is done so in a manner that is meaningful and relevant to their pupils. Strengthening teachers’ agency in relation to pedagogy, however, can sometimes be difficult to achieve because, for example, of perceived issues around workload and accountability. There are many ‘off-the-peg’ or ready-made solutions to the challenges of curriculum reform, and in many cases, schools are responding to such challenges by using ready-made or bespoke approaches. This paper explores the nature of the tensions between the drive to empower professional contributions to curriculum reform, and increase autonomy for teachers, and the existing professional practices. In particular, as an example of the tensions, the paper considers how and why one school selected a commercial mindfulness package to contribute to the newly defined Health and Wellbeing Area of Experience, and the implication of this choice on teacher autonomy and pedagogical practice.","PeriodicalId":46745,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/curj.25","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Current curriculum reform in Wales provides an opportunity for teachers to have greater freedom to develop pedagogical approaches that meet the needs of their pupils. The Successful Futures report (Donaldson, 2015) recommends that teachers should have a greater autonomy in choosing how to deliver the curriculum, and ensuring it is done so in a manner that is meaningful and relevant to their pupils. Strengthening teachers’ agency in relation to pedagogy, however, can sometimes be difficult to achieve because, for example, of perceived issues around workload and accountability. There are many ‘off-the-peg’ or ready-made solutions to the challenges of curriculum reform, and in many cases, schools are responding to such challenges by using ready-made or bespoke approaches. This paper explores the nature of the tensions between the drive to empower professional contributions to curriculum reform, and increase autonomy for teachers, and the existing professional practices. In particular, as an example of the tensions, the paper considers how and why one school selected a commercial mindfulness package to contribute to the newly defined Health and Wellbeing Area of Experience, and the implication of this choice on teacher autonomy and pedagogical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前课程改革的张力与教师专业自主的发展
威尔士目前的课程改革为教师提供了一个机会,使他们有更大的自由来发展满足学生需求的教学方法。《成功的未来》报告(Donaldson, 2015)建议教师在选择如何提供课程方面应该有更大的自主权,并确保以有意义和与学生相关的方式完成课程。然而,加强教师在教学法方面的能动性有时可能难以实现,例如,因为工作量和问责制方面存在明显的问题。面对课程改革的挑战,有许多“现成的”或现成的解决方案,在许多情况下,学校正在通过使用现成或定制的方法来应对这些挑战。本文探讨了授权专业人士为课程改革做出贡献、增加教师自主权的动力与现有专业实践之间紧张关系的本质。特别是,作为紧张关系的一个例子,本文考虑了一所学校如何以及为什么选择一个商业正念包来为新定义的健康和幸福体验领域做出贡献,以及这种选择对教师自主和教学实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum Journal
Curriculum Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Curriculum making and knowledge conceptions in classrooms in the context of standards‐based curricula Review of: Curriculum challenges and opportunities in a changing world: Transnational perspectives in curriculum inquiryB.Green (Eds.) M.Brennan (Eds.) P.Roberts (Eds.) Palgrave MacMillan, 2021, XVII + 355 pp. ISBN 978‐3‐030‐61666‐3. 129,99 € (Hardcover). Teachers’ Perceptions of Physical literacy Curriculum in context Learners’ views of literature in EFL education from curricular and assessment perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1