{"title":"Learning progression in the humanities: identifying tensions in articulating progression in humanities in Wales","authors":"Sioned V. Hughes, Kara Makara, David Stacey","doi":"10.1002/curj.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores tensions in the articulation of progression in learning across \nthe Humanities disciplines. Informed by our review of research in the Humanities \ndisciplines, international curricula on progression in these areas, and reflections \nfrom professional activity within the newly defined Humanities ‘Area of \nLearning and Experience’ (AoLE) in the new Welsh curriculum, this paper \ndescribes how learning progression in Humanities has been conceptualised within \nthe new curriculum and then delineates and critically reviews four challenges that \nemerged when identifying and describing progression in learning in the new \nHumanities curriculum. Tensions include the relationship between disciplines; \nthe balance between knowledge, skills and values; the differences between \nunderlying models of progression in Humanities; and balancing the complexity of \nlearning with practical considerations for a national curriculum. Underpinned by \nthe Integrity Model of Change, this paper makes a contribution, through \nproviding new insights on broad aspects of learning progression in Humanities \nand highlighting potential benefits and challenges of taking particular decisions \nwithin each of these four tensions. Implications for curriculum planning and \nfuture research are offered, including the fundamental role of professional \nlearning in curriculum development and enactment.","PeriodicalId":46745,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/curj.28","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper explores tensions in the articulation of progression in learning across
the Humanities disciplines. Informed by our review of research in the Humanities
disciplines, international curricula on progression in these areas, and reflections
from professional activity within the newly defined Humanities ‘Area of
Learning and Experience’ (AoLE) in the new Welsh curriculum, this paper
describes how learning progression in Humanities has been conceptualised within
the new curriculum and then delineates and critically reviews four challenges that
emerged when identifying and describing progression in learning in the new
Humanities curriculum. Tensions include the relationship between disciplines;
the balance between knowledge, skills and values; the differences between
underlying models of progression in Humanities; and balancing the complexity of
learning with practical considerations for a national curriculum. Underpinned by
the Integrity Model of Change, this paper makes a contribution, through
providing new insights on broad aspects of learning progression in Humanities
and highlighting potential benefits and challenges of taking particular decisions
within each of these four tensions. Implications for curriculum planning and
future research are offered, including the fundamental role of professional
learning in curriculum development and enactment.