{"title":"Performance feedback as a determinant of ego-network stability in collaboration networks","authors":"Jingbei Wang, Yafei Nie, Min Guo, Hui Liu","doi":"10.1007/s10490-023-09872-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Collaboration networks are not intrinsically unstable and fragile, ego-network stability cannot be taken for granted. Extant research has highlighted the determinants of ego-network stability; nevertheless, it is still unclear how behavioral factors affect a firm’s ego-network stability in a collaboration network as a consequence of a decision-maker’s bounded rationality. Drawing from the behavioral theory of the firm and attention-based view, this paper explores how ego-network stability is affected by performance feedback and investigates the influence of CEOs’ information advantage and power on firms’ responses to performance feedback. Using longitudinal data on Chinese publicly listed firms in the pharmaceutical industry from 2007 to 2020, we find that the magnitude of a firm’s outperformance relative to its aspirations harms its ego-network stability. The magnitude of a firm’s underperformance relative to its aspirations has a U-shaped relationship with its ego-network stability. Moreover, CEOs’ social capital and power strengthen the negative relationship between the magnitude of a firm’s outperformance relative to its aspirations and its ego-network stability, and CEOs’ social capital flattens the U-shaped effect of the magnitude of a firm’s underperformance relative to its aspirations on its ego-network stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8474,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","volume":"41 2","pages":"789 - 821"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10490-023-09872-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Collaboration networks are not intrinsically unstable and fragile, ego-network stability cannot be taken for granted. Extant research has highlighted the determinants of ego-network stability; nevertheless, it is still unclear how behavioral factors affect a firm’s ego-network stability in a collaboration network as a consequence of a decision-maker’s bounded rationality. Drawing from the behavioral theory of the firm and attention-based view, this paper explores how ego-network stability is affected by performance feedback and investigates the influence of CEOs’ information advantage and power on firms’ responses to performance feedback. Using longitudinal data on Chinese publicly listed firms in the pharmaceutical industry from 2007 to 2020, we find that the magnitude of a firm’s outperformance relative to its aspirations harms its ego-network stability. The magnitude of a firm’s underperformance relative to its aspirations has a U-shaped relationship with its ego-network stability. Moreover, CEOs’ social capital and power strengthen the negative relationship between the magnitude of a firm’s outperformance relative to its aspirations and its ego-network stability, and CEOs’ social capital flattens the U-shaped effect of the magnitude of a firm’s underperformance relative to its aspirations on its ego-network stability.
合作网络并非本质上不稳定和脆弱,但自我网络的稳定性并非理所当然。已有的研究强调了自我网络稳定性的决定因素;然而,行为因素如何影响企业在协作网络中的自我网络稳定性,从而导致决策者的有限理性,目前仍不清楚。本文从企业行为理论和注意力观点出发,探讨了自我网络稳定性如何受到绩效反馈的影响,并研究了首席执行官的信息优势和权力对企业绩效反馈反应的影响。利用 2007 年至 2020 年中国医药行业上市公司的纵向数据,我们发现,公司业绩相对于其愿望的超额幅度会损害其自我网络的稳定性。而企业相对于其期望的业绩不佳程度与其自我网络的稳定性呈 U 型关系。此外,首席执行官的社会资本和权力加强了公司相对于其期望的超额业绩与自我网络稳定性之间的负相关,而首席执行官的社会资本则拉平了公司相对于其期望的不佳业绩对其自我网络稳定性的 U 型效应。
期刊介绍:
The Asia Pacific Journal of Management publishes original manuscripts on management and organizational research in the Asia Pacific region, encompassing Pacific Rim countries and mainland Asia. APJM focuses on the extent to which each manuscript addresses matters that pertain to the most fundamental question: “What determines organization success?” The major academic disciplines that we cover include entrepreneurship, human resource management, international business, organizational behavior, and strategic management. However, manuscripts that belong to other well-established disciplines such as accounting, economics, finance, marketing, and operations generally do not fall into the scope of APJM. We endeavor to be the major vehicle for exchange of ideas and research among management scholars within or interested in the broadly defined Asia Pacific region.Key features include:
Rigor - maintained through strict review processes, high quality global reviewers, and Editorial Advisory and Review Boards comprising prominent researchers from many countries.
Relevance - maintained by its focus on key management and organizational trends in the region.
Uniqueness - being the first and most prominent management journal published in and about the fastest growing region in the world.
Official affiliation - Asia Academy of ManagementFor more information, visit the AAOM website:www.baf.cuhk.edu.hk/asia-aom/ Officially cited as: Asia Pac J Manag