Estimates of regional contributions to wet acid deposition in western Massachusetts during the summer of 1984

George T. Wolff
{"title":"Estimates of regional contributions to wet acid deposition in western Massachusetts during the summer of 1984","authors":"George T. Wolff","doi":"10.1016/0004-6981(89)90008-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The General Motors mobile Atmospheric Research Laboratory was situated in rural western Massachusetts in the Berkshire Mountains for 62 days during the summer of 1984. One purpose of this study was to determine the source regions of wet acid deposition for this northeastern U.S. location. First, to apportion the precursors (sulfate, sulfur dioxide and nitrate) to source regions, daily ambient air samples were analyzed for the precursors as well as for tracer species that are associated with particular sources. Factor and trajectory analyses were then used to deduce the contributions of the Midwest and the Northeast to these precursors. Finally, the contribution of the precursors to precipitation acidity was estimated by analyzing the chemical constituents in the rain during seven precipitation events. Averaged over the entire duration of the study, the data show that Northeast sources accounted for about 60% of the precipitation sulfate and nitrate, while Midwest sources accounted for about 30%. The balance (~ 10%) was accounted for by background sulfate. A more useful way of examining the data is according to the type of storm that caused the wet deposition. The site was affected by two basic types of storms: coastal low-pressure systems that traveled up the Atlantic Coast, and cold fronts that approached from the west. During the coastal lowpressure events, the Midwestern contribution to precipitation acidity was zero, as easterly flows from the Atlantic Ocean dominated. The cold front events, however, were all associated with southwesterly flows, and the Midwest contributions exceeded the Northeast contributions. During these events, the average Midwest contribution to precipitation acidity was about 50%. For all events, the ratio of sulfate to nitrate was approximately 2:1 on an equivalent basis. During the coastal lows, the relative nitrate contributions were the highest. It was estimated that particulate sulfate scavenging was responsible for about half of the sulfate in the rain, while the other half was due to in-cloud oxidation of gaseous sulfur dioxide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100138,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment (1967)","volume":"23 3","pages":"Pages 595-601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90008-5","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment (1967)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0004698189900085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The General Motors mobile Atmospheric Research Laboratory was situated in rural western Massachusetts in the Berkshire Mountains for 62 days during the summer of 1984. One purpose of this study was to determine the source regions of wet acid deposition for this northeastern U.S. location. First, to apportion the precursors (sulfate, sulfur dioxide and nitrate) to source regions, daily ambient air samples were analyzed for the precursors as well as for tracer species that are associated with particular sources. Factor and trajectory analyses were then used to deduce the contributions of the Midwest and the Northeast to these precursors. Finally, the contribution of the precursors to precipitation acidity was estimated by analyzing the chemical constituents in the rain during seven precipitation events. Averaged over the entire duration of the study, the data show that Northeast sources accounted for about 60% of the precipitation sulfate and nitrate, while Midwest sources accounted for about 30%. The balance (~ 10%) was accounted for by background sulfate. A more useful way of examining the data is according to the type of storm that caused the wet deposition. The site was affected by two basic types of storms: coastal low-pressure systems that traveled up the Atlantic Coast, and cold fronts that approached from the west. During the coastal lowpressure events, the Midwestern contribution to precipitation acidity was zero, as easterly flows from the Atlantic Ocean dominated. The cold front events, however, were all associated with southwesterly flows, and the Midwest contributions exceeded the Northeast contributions. During these events, the average Midwest contribution to precipitation acidity was about 50%. For all events, the ratio of sulfate to nitrate was approximately 2:1 on an equivalent basis. During the coastal lows, the relative nitrate contributions were the highest. It was estimated that particulate sulfate scavenging was responsible for about half of the sulfate in the rain, while the other half was due to in-cloud oxidation of gaseous sulfur dioxide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1984年夏季马萨诸塞州西部湿酸沉积的区域贡献估计
1984年夏天,通用汽车移动大气研究实验室被安置在马萨诸塞州西部的伯克夏山脉的乡下,在那里呆了62天。这项研究的目的之一是确定美国东北部湿酸沉积的来源区域。首先,为了将前体(硫酸盐、二氧化硫和硝酸盐)分配到来源地区,分析了每日环境空气样本中的前体以及与特定来源相关的示踪剂物种。然后使用因子和轨迹分析来推断中西部和东北部对这些前兆的贡献。最后,通过对7次降水事件中降水化学成分的分析,估算了前驱体对降水酸度的贡献。在整个研究期间的平均数据显示,东北来源约占降水硫酸盐和硝酸盐的60%,而中西部来源约占30%。其余(~ 10%)由本底硫酸盐占。检验数据的一个更有用的方法是根据引起湿沉积的风暴类型。该地区受到两种基本类型风暴的影响:沿大西洋沿岸移动的沿海低压系统,以及从西部接近的冷锋。在沿海低压事件期间,中西部对降水酸度的贡献为零,因为来自大西洋的东风气流占主导地位。然而,冷锋事件都与西南气流有关,中西部的贡献大于东北的贡献。在这些事件中,中西部对降水酸度的平均贡献约为50%。对于所有事件,硫酸盐与硝酸盐的比例在等效基础上约为2:1。在沿海低潮期,硝酸盐的相对贡献最大。据估计,雨中大约一半的硫酸盐是由颗粒物硫酸盐清除造成的,而另一半是由于云内气态二氧化硫的氧化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calendar Introduction Errata Calendar Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1