Cognitive behavioural therapy for ADHD in adults: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Q1 Psychology ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders Pub Date : 2016-03-01 Epub Date: 2016-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s12402-016-0188-3
Christina Mohr Jensen, Birgitte Lind Amdisen, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Sidse M H Arnfred
{"title":"Cognitive behavioural therapy for ADHD in adults: systematic review and meta-analyses.","authors":"Christina Mohr Jensen, Birgitte Lind Amdisen, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Sidse M H Arnfred","doi":"10.1007/s12402-016-0188-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systematically review and analyse the efficacy of CBT versus treatment as usual in adults with ADHD. The literature was systematically searched ending the 28 March 2014. Standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. CBT was efficacious in reducing symptoms of ADHD (SDM -1.0, 95% CI -1.5 to -0.5) when evaluated by the patients, but not when evaluated by a clinician. Symptoms of depression and anxiety were significantly reduced when self-reported (SMD -1.0, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.5 and -1.0, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.3, respectively) and evaluated by a clinician (SMD -0.9, 95% CI -1.7 to -0.2 and -0.9, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.1). The clinical global impression scores improved more in the group randomised to CBT (-1.0; 95% CI -1.6 to -0.4). CBT seems efficacious in some domains affecting adult patients with ADHD, but needs further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39230,"journal":{"name":"ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders","volume":"8 1","pages":"3-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-016-0188-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systematically review and analyse the efficacy of CBT versus treatment as usual in adults with ADHD. The literature was systematically searched ending the 28 March 2014. Standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. CBT was efficacious in reducing symptoms of ADHD (SDM -1.0, 95% CI -1.5 to -0.5) when evaluated by the patients, but not when evaluated by a clinician. Symptoms of depression and anxiety were significantly reduced when self-reported (SMD -1.0, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.5 and -1.0, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.3, respectively) and evaluated by a clinician (SMD -0.9, 95% CI -1.7 to -0.2 and -0.9, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.1). The clinical global impression scores improved more in the group randomised to CBT (-1.0; 95% CI -1.6 to -0.4). CBT seems efficacious in some domains affecting adult patients with ADHD, but needs further evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人ADHD的认知行为疗法:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
系统回顾和分析CBT与常规治疗对ADHD成人的疗效。系统检索截至2014年3月28日的文献。计算标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间。经患者评估,CBT在减轻ADHD症状方面有效(SDM -1.0, 95% CI -1.5至-0.5),但经临床医生评估无效。当自我报告(SMD -1.0, 95% CI分别为-1.6至-0.5和-1.0,95% CI分别为-1.3至-0.3)并由临床医生评估(SMD -0.9, 95% CI为-1.7至-0.2和-0.9,95% CI为-1.6至-0.1)时,抑郁和焦虑症状显著减轻。随机分配到CBT组的临床总体印象评分改善更多(-1.0;95% CI -1.6 ~ -0.4)。CBT似乎在影响ADHD成人患者的某些领域有效,但需要进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In memoriam: John Fayyad (1961–2018) Publisher’s Note to: Editors must be vigilant to guarantee the quality and credibility of published scientific work Acknowledgement to reviewers 2017 Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale: Self-Report The development of the SGI-16: a shortened sensory gating deficit and distractibility questionnaire for adults with ADHD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1