Mechanism of feedback affecting task performance

Tamao Matsui, Akinori Okada, Osamu Inoshita
{"title":"Mechanism of feedback affecting task performance","authors":"Tamao Matsui,&nbsp;Akinori Okada,&nbsp;Osamu Inoshita","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(83)90115-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two experiments found that the beneficial effect of feedback on performace was anegative function of goal progress. In Study 1, 87 female college students were given the goal to solve 70 arithmetic problems on a trial lasting 10 min. After 5-min work on the trial, the subjects received feedback on the number attempted. To the extentthat their goal progress was low, the subjects felt less satisfied with their previous progress, had a low expectancy of reaching the goal, became more involved in the task, and workedfaster than they had previously. In addition, it was suggested that the goal and feedback induced a larger amount of effort from the subjects who were low in progres than from the subjects who were high in progress. Study 2, using 103 male undergraduates as subjects, replicated the previous findings, and also found that feedback improved performance only through its influence on the subjects' intention to work faster. Implications for previous goal/feedback related findings are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 114-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90115-0","citationCount":"98","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational behavior and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030507383901150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 98

Abstract

Two experiments found that the beneficial effect of feedback on performace was anegative function of goal progress. In Study 1, 87 female college students were given the goal to solve 70 arithmetic problems on a trial lasting 10 min. After 5-min work on the trial, the subjects received feedback on the number attempted. To the extentthat their goal progress was low, the subjects felt less satisfied with their previous progress, had a low expectancy of reaching the goal, became more involved in the task, and workedfaster than they had previously. In addition, it was suggested that the goal and feedback induced a larger amount of effort from the subjects who were low in progres than from the subjects who were high in progress. Study 2, using 103 male undergraduates as subjects, replicated the previous findings, and also found that feedback improved performance only through its influence on the subjects' intention to work faster. Implications for previous goal/feedback related findings are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反馈影响任务绩效的机制
两个实验发现,反馈对绩效的有利作用是目标进展的负函数。在研究1中,87名女大学生被要求在一个持续10分钟的实验中解决70道算术题。在5分钟的实验后,受试者得到了关于尝试数字的反馈。在某种程度上,他们的目标进度较低,受试者对之前的进度感到不满意,对实现目标的期望较低,更投入任务,工作速度比以前更快。此外,研究表明,目标和反馈诱导进度低的被试比进度高的被试付出更大的努力。研究2以103名男性本科生为研究对象,重复了之前的研究结果,并发现反馈仅通过影响研究对象更快地工作的意愿来提高绩效。讨论了对先前目标/反馈相关发现的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Career transitions within organizations: An exploratory study of work, nonwork, and coping strategies Accountability to constituents: A two-edged sword A within-person test of the form of the expectancy theory model in a choice context A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions Perceived competence as a moderator of the relationship between role clarity and job performance: A test of two hypotheses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1