Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms?

M.Susan Taylor, Edwin A. Locke, Cynthia Lee , Marilyn E. Gist
{"title":"Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms?","authors":"M.Susan Taylor,&nbsp;Edwin A. Locke,&nbsp;Cynthia Lee ,&nbsp;Marilyn E. Gist","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(84)90046-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the relationship between Type A behavior and the research productivity of university faculty. The research also examined the roles played by various Type A subfactors (job involvement, competitiveness, and impatience) and by three hypothesized intervening variables (self-efficacy, performance goals, and working on multiple projects) in the Type A—productivity relationship. Results showed a direct relationship between Type A behavior and both quantity and quality indices of faculty research productivity. Findings also supported self-efficacy, goals, and working on multiple projects as variables intervening between the display of Type A behavior and performance. Job involvement was found to be the only Type A subfactor related to productivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 402-418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90046-1","citationCount":"358","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational behavior and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030507384900461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 358

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between Type A behavior and the research productivity of university faculty. The research also examined the roles played by various Type A subfactors (job involvement, competitiveness, and impatience) and by three hypothesized intervening variables (self-efficacy, performance goals, and working on multiple projects) in the Type A—productivity relationship. Results showed a direct relationship between Type A behavior and both quantity and quality indices of faculty research productivity. Findings also supported self-efficacy, goals, and working on multiple projects as variables intervening between the display of Type A behavior and performance. Job involvement was found to be the only Type A subfactor related to productivity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A型行为与教师研究效率:机制是什么?
本研究探讨了A型行为与大学教师科研生产力的关系。该研究还考察了A型员工的各种子因素(工作投入、竞争力和不耐烦)以及三个假设的干预变量(自我效能、绩效目标和同时参与多个项目)在A型生产力关系中所起的作用。结果表明,a型行为与教师科研生产力的数量和质量指标均有直接关系。研究结果还支持自我效能感、目标和在多个项目中工作作为A型行为表现和表现之间的变量。工作投入被发现是唯一与生产力相关的A型子因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Career transitions within organizations: An exploratory study of work, nonwork, and coping strategies Accountability to constituents: A two-edged sword A within-person test of the form of the expectancy theory model in a choice context A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions Perceived competence as a moderator of the relationship between role clarity and job performance: A test of two hypotheses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1