Comparación entre las calculadoras de riesgo del European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) y Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG): predicción del riesgo de cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo en una cohorte de pacientes de Argentina

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Actas urologicas espanolas Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acuro.2023.07.008
P.M. Orbe Villota , J.A. Leiva Centeno , J. Lugones , P.G. Minuzzi , S.M. Varea
{"title":"Comparación entre las calculadoras de riesgo del European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) y Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG): predicción del riesgo de cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo en una cohorte de pacientes de Argentina","authors":"P.M. Orbe Villota ,&nbsp;J.A. Leiva Centeno ,&nbsp;J. Lugones ,&nbsp;P.G. Minuzzi ,&nbsp;S.M. Varea","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the performance of the risk calculators of the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) in predicting the risk of presenting clinically significant prostate cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Retrospectively, patients who underwent prostate biopsy at Sanatorio Allende Cerro, Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina, were identified from January 2018 to December 2021. The probability of having prostate cancer was calculated with the two calculators separately and then the results were compared to establish which of the two performed better. For this, areas under the curve (AUC) were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>250 patients were included, 140 (56%) presented prostate cancer, of which 92 (65.71%) had clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥<!--> <!-->7). The patients who presented cancer were older, had a higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, and had a smaller prostate size. The AUC to predict the probability of having clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.79 and 0.73 for PBCG-RC and ERSPC-RC respectively (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0084).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this cohort of patients, both prostate cancer risk calculators performed well in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer risk, although the PBCG-RC showed better accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 3","pages":"Pages 210-217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480623001262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare the performance of the risk calculators of the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) in predicting the risk of presenting clinically significant prostate cancer.

Material and methods

Retrospectively, patients who underwent prostate biopsy at Sanatorio Allende Cerro, Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina, were identified from January 2018 to December 2021. The probability of having prostate cancer was calculated with the two calculators separately and then the results were compared to establish which of the two performed better. For this, areas under the curve (AUC) were analyzed.

Results

250 patients were included, 140 (56%) presented prostate cancer, of which 92 (65.71%) had clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 7). The patients who presented cancer were older, had a higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, and had a smaller prostate size. The AUC to predict the probability of having clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.79 and 0.73 for PBCG-RC and ERSPC-RC respectively (p = 0.0084).

Conclusion

In this cohort of patients, both prostate cancer risk calculators performed well in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer risk, although the PBCG-RC showed better accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)与前列腺活检协作组(PBCG)风险计算器的比较:阿根廷患者队列中具有临床意义的前列腺癌风险预测。
目的比较欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)和前列腺活检协作组(PBCG)的风险计算器在预测出现有临床意义的前列腺癌风险方面的性能。材料和方法回顾性地识别了2018年1月至2021年12月期间在阿根廷科尔多瓦市阿连德塞罗疗养院接受前列腺活检的患者。分别使用两种计算器计算患前列腺癌的概率,然后对结果进行比较,以确定哪种计算器的性能更好。结果250名患者中,140人(56%)患有前列腺癌,其中92人(65.71%)患有有临床意义的前列腺癌(格里森评分≥7分)。出现癌症的患者年龄较大,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值较高,前列腺体积较小。PBCG-RC和ERSPC-RC预测临床显性前列腺癌概率的AUC分别为0.79和0.73(p = 0.0084)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Actas urologicas espanolas
Actas urologicas espanolas UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Actas Urológicas Españolas is an international journal dedicated to urological diseases and renal transplant. It has been the official publication of the Spanish Urology Association since 1974 and of the American Urology Confederation since 2008. Its articles cover all aspects related to urology. Actas Urológicas Españolas, governed by the peer review system (double blinded), is published online in Spanish and English. Consequently, manuscripts may be sent in Spanish or English and bidirectional free cost translation will be provided.
期刊最新文献
El leaking pipeline y las brechas de género en Urología Controversias en el abordaje del cáncer de próstata: consenso de recomendaciones de expertos del norte de España Hacia el cribado poblacional del cáncer de próstata en España Evaluación de los cambios en la función sexual en pacientes sometidos a cirugía endoscópica de la litiasis del tracto urinario superior Producción científica en urología: un análisis bibliométrico de 20 años en Latinoamérica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1