Male breast cancer: Medical and psychological management in comparison to female breast cancer. A review

Tricia L. da Silva
{"title":"Male breast cancer: Medical and psychological management in comparison to female breast cancer. A review","authors":"Tricia L. da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrc.2016.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare illness and its management is largely based on published data from female breast cancer (FBC). The objective of this review was to evaluate the literature to determine if MBC is adequately understood, studied and treated, both medically and psychologically, despite its rarity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted, using PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCOHOST, and PsycINFO, for all articles containing the term “male breast cancer” or “male breast carcinoma” and published in English up to October 2015. Additional references were obtained from secondary search engines like Google Scholar and the citation lists of sourced articles.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Published literature and public and healthcare awareness of MBC are far more limited than for FBC. Combined with misperception of breast cancer as a ‘female illness’, this may contribute to delayed diagnosis, worse prognosis, stigma and limited psychosocial support for male patients. Inconsistent use of medical treatment modalities, fewer treatment benefits, sparse safety data and a paucity of psychosocial research and services, as compared to FBC, may further contribute to poorer outcomes in MBC. Differences in etiological, diagnostic and treatment data between MBC and FBC also challenge the applicability of FBC management strategies to MBC.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MBC is a distinct condition that is much less understood, significantly understudied, and possibly undertreated, than FBC. Prospective research is essential to establish MBC-specific standards of care and guide medical and psychological interventions. Public and health professional education is also needed to raise awareness of MBC, reduce stigma and facilitate early detection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90461,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctrc.2016.03.004","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213089616300172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare illness and its management is largely based on published data from female breast cancer (FBC). The objective of this review was to evaluate the literature to determine if MBC is adequately understood, studied and treated, both medically and psychologically, despite its rarity.

Methods

A literature search was conducted, using PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCOHOST, and PsycINFO, for all articles containing the term “male breast cancer” or “male breast carcinoma” and published in English up to October 2015. Additional references were obtained from secondary search engines like Google Scholar and the citation lists of sourced articles.

Results

Published literature and public and healthcare awareness of MBC are far more limited than for FBC. Combined with misperception of breast cancer as a ‘female illness’, this may contribute to delayed diagnosis, worse prognosis, stigma and limited psychosocial support for male patients. Inconsistent use of medical treatment modalities, fewer treatment benefits, sparse safety data and a paucity of psychosocial research and services, as compared to FBC, may further contribute to poorer outcomes in MBC. Differences in etiological, diagnostic and treatment data between MBC and FBC also challenge the applicability of FBC management strategies to MBC.

Conclusion

MBC is a distinct condition that is much less understood, significantly understudied, and possibly undertreated, than FBC. Prospective research is essential to establish MBC-specific standards of care and guide medical and psychological interventions. Public and health professional education is also needed to raise awareness of MBC, reduce stigma and facilitate early detection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男性乳腺癌:与女性乳腺癌相比的医疗和心理管理。回顾
男性乳腺癌(MBC)是一种罕见的疾病,其治疗主要基于已发表的女性乳腺癌(FBC)数据。本综述的目的是评估文献,以确定尽管MBC罕见,但是否在医学和心理上得到了充分的理解、研究和治疗。方法采用PubMed、ProQuest、EBSCOHOST、PsycINFO等软件检索截至2015年10月发表的所有包含“male breast cancer”或“male breast carcinoma”的英文文献。其他参考文献来自b谷歌Scholar等二级搜索引擎和来源文章的引文列表。结果已发表的文献和公众对MBC的认识远远低于FBC。再加上对乳腺癌作为一种“女性疾病”的误解,这可能导致男性患者诊断延迟、预后恶化、污名化和社会心理支持有限。与FBC相比,医疗方式的使用不一致、治疗效益较少、安全性数据缺乏以及社会心理研究和服务的缺乏,可能进一步导致MBC的预后较差。MBC和FBC在病因、诊断和治疗数据上的差异也挑战了FBC管理策略对MBC的适用性。结论与FBC相比,mbc是一种独特的疾病,人们对其了解甚少,研究明显不足,治疗也可能不足。前瞻性研究对于建立针对mbc的护理标准和指导医疗和心理干预至关重要。还需要进行公共和卫生专业教育,以提高对MBC的认识,减少耻辱感并促进早期发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer: expert perspectives on its role in clinical practice Activity of trastuzumab-emtansine (TDM1) in HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases: A case series Pigmentation of the tongue with lapatinib treatment in a patient with advanced breast cancer: A case report Assessment of chemotherapy strategy using bevacizumab for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in a real-world setting: A multi-institutional observational study Multiple nodular lung metastases with no obvious primary showing low positive 18-fluoro deoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) scan: A unique case of metastatic ameloblastoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1