Analyzing clinical outcomes in laparoscopic right vs. left colectomy in colon cancer patients using the NSQIP database

Valentine Nfonsam , Hassan Aziz , Viraj Pandit , Mazhar Khalil , Jana Jandova , Bellal Joseph
{"title":"Analyzing clinical outcomes in laparoscopic right vs. left colectomy in colon cancer patients using the NSQIP database","authors":"Valentine Nfonsam ,&nbsp;Hassan Aziz ,&nbsp;Viraj Pandit ,&nbsp;Mazhar Khalil ,&nbsp;Jana Jandova ,&nbsp;Bellal Joseph","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrc.2016.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Optimization of surgical outcomes after colectomy continues to be actively studied, but most studies group right-sided and left-sided colectomies together. The aim of our study was to determine whether the complication rate differs between right-sided and left-sided colectomies for cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We identified patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer between 2005 and 2010 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and stratified cases by right and left side. The two groups were matched using propensity score matching for demographics, previous abdominal surgery, pre-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and pre-operative laboratory data. Outcome measures were: 30-day mortality and morbidity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 2512 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy for right-sided or left-sided colon cancer. The two groups were similar in demographics, and pre-operative characteristics. There was no difference in overall morbidity (15% vs. 17.7%; <em>p</em> value&lt;0.08) or 30-day mortality (1.5% vs. 1.5%; <em>p</em> value&lt;0.9) between the two groups. Sub-analysis revealed higher surgical site infection rates (9% vs. 6%; <em>p</em> value&lt;0.04), higher incidence of ureteral injury (0.6% vs. 0.4%; <em>p</em> value&lt;0.04), higher conversion rate to open colectomy (51% vs. 30%; <em>p</em> value&lt;0.01) and a longer hospital length of stay (10.5±4 vs. 7.1±1.3 days; <em>p</em> value&lt;0.02) in patients undergoing laparoscopic left colectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study highlights the difference in complications between right-sided and left-sided colectomies for cancer. Further research on outcomes after colectomy should incorporate right vs. left side colon resection as a potential pre-operative risk factor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90461,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctrc.2016.03.006","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213089616300196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Introduction

Optimization of surgical outcomes after colectomy continues to be actively studied, but most studies group right-sided and left-sided colectomies together. The aim of our study was to determine whether the complication rate differs between right-sided and left-sided colectomies for cancer.

Methods

We identified patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer between 2005 and 2010 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and stratified cases by right and left side. The two groups were matched using propensity score matching for demographics, previous abdominal surgery, pre-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and pre-operative laboratory data. Outcome measures were: 30-day mortality and morbidity.

Results

We identified 2512 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy for right-sided or left-sided colon cancer. The two groups were similar in demographics, and pre-operative characteristics. There was no difference in overall morbidity (15% vs. 17.7%; p value<0.08) or 30-day mortality (1.5% vs. 1.5%; p value<0.9) between the two groups. Sub-analysis revealed higher surgical site infection rates (9% vs. 6%; p value<0.04), higher incidence of ureteral injury (0.6% vs. 0.4%; p value<0.04), higher conversion rate to open colectomy (51% vs. 30%; p value<0.01) and a longer hospital length of stay (10.5±4 vs. 7.1±1.3 days; p value<0.02) in patients undergoing laparoscopic left colectomy.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the difference in complications between right-sided and left-sided colectomies for cancer. Further research on outcomes after colectomy should incorporate right vs. left side colon resection as a potential pre-operative risk factor.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用NSQIP数据库分析结肠癌患者腹腔镜右结肠切除术与左结肠切除术的临床结果
结肠切除术后手术效果的优化仍在积极研究中,但大多数研究将右侧和左侧结肠切除术放在一起。我们研究的目的是确定右侧和左侧结肠切除术对癌症的并发症发生率是否不同。方法我们从美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库中选取2005 - 2010年间接受腹腔镜结肠切除术的结肠癌患者,并按左右侧分层。使用人口统计学、既往腹部手术、术前化疗和放疗以及术前实验室数据的倾向评分匹配对两组进行匹配。结果指标为:30天死亡率和发病率。结果:2512例右侧或左侧结肠癌患者行选择性腹腔镜结肠切除术。两组在人口统计学和术前特征上相似。总体发病率无差异(15% vs. 17.7%;P值<0.08)或30天死亡率(1.5% vs. 1.5%;P值<0.9)。亚分析显示手术部位感染率较高(9% vs. 6%;P值<0.04),输尿管损伤发生率较高(0.6% vs. 0.4%;P值<0.04),开腹结肠切除术转换率较高(51% vs. 30%;P值<0.01)和更长的住院时间(10.5±4天vs. 7.1±1.3天;P值<0.02)。结论我们的研究强调了右侧和左侧结肠切除术在癌症并发症方面的差异。结肠切除术后预后的进一步研究应将右侧结肠切除术与左侧结肠切除术作为潜在的术前危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer: expert perspectives on its role in clinical practice Activity of trastuzumab-emtansine (TDM1) in HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases: A case series Pigmentation of the tongue with lapatinib treatment in a patient with advanced breast cancer: A case report Assessment of chemotherapy strategy using bevacizumab for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in a real-world setting: A multi-institutional observational study Multiple nodular lung metastases with no obvious primary showing low positive 18-fluoro deoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) scan: A unique case of metastatic ameloblastoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1