Post-implantation syndrome – retrospective analysis of 52 patients

Vítor Ferreira, Rui Machado, Joana Martins, Luís Loureiro, Tiago Loureiro, Lisa Borges, Diogo Silveira, Sérgio Teixeira, Duarte Rego, João Gonçalves, Gabriela Teixeira, Inês Antunes, Rui Almeida
{"title":"Post-implantation syndrome – retrospective analysis of 52 patients","authors":"Vítor Ferreira,&nbsp;Rui Machado,&nbsp;Joana Martins,&nbsp;Luís Loureiro,&nbsp;Tiago Loureiro,&nbsp;Lisa Borges,&nbsp;Diogo Silveira,&nbsp;Sérgio Teixeira,&nbsp;Duarte Rego,&nbsp;João Gonçalves,&nbsp;Gabriela Teixeira,&nbsp;Inês Antunes,&nbsp;Rui Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.ancv.2015.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A systemic inflamatory response is common after EVAR. Its clinical impact is unknown, and although is it usually well tolerated, there is concern it might be associated with increased morbidity and mortality in high risk patients. This study aims to evaluate the occurrence of the post-implantation syndrome (PIS) in patients undergoing EVAR, its characteristics and clinical significance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study is a retrospective observational analysis of patients undergoing elective EVAR between November 2012 and November 2014. PIS was defined by fever (&gt;38<!--> <!-->°C) and leukocytosis (&gt;12,000<!--> <!-->μL<sup>−1</sup>), excluding infectious complications. We evaluated the epidemiological characteristics of the patient, aneurysm and procedure characteristics and their relationship with development of PIS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty-two patients were included, and 21.2% were diagnosed with PIS. The ePTFE grafts were not associated with the occurrence of the syndrome, in contrast with polyester stent grafts (0% vs. 28.2%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.031). The age and gender of patients, the diameter of the aneurysm, duration and radiation dose and the configuration of the stent graft (aorto-bi-iliac, aorto-uni-iliac or fenestrated) were not associated with PIS. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of major cardiovascular events during hospitalization in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The inflammatory syndrome after EVAR occurs in a significant percentage of patients (21%). Stent grafts constructed by polyester are a significant risk factor. Despite the exuberant inflammatory response, it was not associated with increased occurrence of cardiovascular events, and it is usually benign, well tolerated and self-limiting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":30341,"journal":{"name":"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 204-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancv.2015.09.008","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1646706X1500107X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction

A systemic inflamatory response is common after EVAR. Its clinical impact is unknown, and although is it usually well tolerated, there is concern it might be associated with increased morbidity and mortality in high risk patients. This study aims to evaluate the occurrence of the post-implantation syndrome (PIS) in patients undergoing EVAR, its characteristics and clinical significance.

Methods

This study is a retrospective observational analysis of patients undergoing elective EVAR between November 2012 and November 2014. PIS was defined by fever (>38 °C) and leukocytosis (>12,000 μL−1), excluding infectious complications. We evaluated the epidemiological characteristics of the patient, aneurysm and procedure characteristics and their relationship with development of PIS.

Results

Fifty-two patients were included, and 21.2% were diagnosed with PIS. The ePTFE grafts were not associated with the occurrence of the syndrome, in contrast with polyester stent grafts (0% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.031). The age and gender of patients, the diameter of the aneurysm, duration and radiation dose and the configuration of the stent graft (aorto-bi-iliac, aorto-uni-iliac or fenestrated) were not associated with PIS. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of major cardiovascular events during hospitalization in both groups.

Conclusion

The inflammatory syndrome after EVAR occurs in a significant percentage of patients (21%). Stent grafts constructed by polyester are a significant risk factor. Despite the exuberant inflammatory response, it was not associated with increased occurrence of cardiovascular events, and it is usually benign, well tolerated and self-limiting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植入后综合征52例回顾性分析
EVAR后的全身炎症反应是常见的。其临床影响尚不清楚,尽管通常耐受性良好,但人们担心它可能与高风险患者发病率和死亡率增加有关。本研究旨在探讨EVAR患者植入后综合征(PIS)的发生、特点及临床意义。方法回顾性观察分析2012年11月至2014年11月择期EVAR患者。PIS的定义为发热(38°C)和白细胞增多(12,000 μL−1),排除感染性并发症。我们评估了患者的流行病学特征、动脉瘤和手术特征及其与PIS发展的关系。结果共纳入52例患者,其中21.2%诊断为PIS。与聚酯支架相比,ePTFE支架与综合征的发生无关(0% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.031)。患者的年龄和性别、动脉瘤直径、持续时间和辐射剂量以及支架的构型(主动脉-双髂、主动脉-单髂或开窗)与PIS无关。两组住院期间主要心血管事件的发生率无统计学差异。结论EVAR后出现炎症综合征的患者比例显著(21%)。聚酯纤维支架是一个重要的危险因素。尽管炎症反应旺盛,但它与心血管事件的发生率增加无关,并且通常是良性的,耐受性良好且具有自限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tuberculous aortitis, a case report Endovascular treatment of synchronous and metachronous aneurysms of the thoracic aorta. Is there an increase in the procedural risk? Fístula arteriovenosa radial pós‐cateterismo cardíaco – abordagem terapêutica Aplicação do Glasgow Aneurysm Score como modelo preditivo de mortalidade em doentes com rutura de aneurisma da aorta abdominal Reparação endovascular na rutura aorto‐ilíaca
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1