Associations Between Cessation of Second-Line Therapies and Relapse Rates of Childhood Refractory Minimal-Change Nephrotic Syndrome: A Single-Center, Retrospective Chart Review

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.curtheres.2022.100671
Jing Jin MSc, Yufeng Li MD, PhD, Yaju Zhu MSc, Jiajia Ni MD, PhD
{"title":"Associations Between Cessation of Second-Line Therapies and Relapse Rates of Childhood Refractory Minimal-Change Nephrotic Syndrome: A Single-Center, Retrospective Chart Review","authors":"Jing Jin MSc,&nbsp;Yufeng Li MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yaju Zhu MSc,&nbsp;Jiajia Ni MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.curtheres.2022.100671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Most patients (≥85%) with minimal-change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) respond to corticosteroid treatment. However, about 10% to 20% of patients with MCNS have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and 25% to 43% of patients have steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome or frequent-relapse steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Patients with refractory MCNS are treated with various second-line therapies.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the associations between the use of various second-line therapies and relapse rates in Chinese patients with childhood refractory MCNS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this study, patients with childhood nephrotic syndrome renal biopsy proved to be “minimal change” from a single tertiary-care center between January 2002 and July 2018 were identified. A Total of 56 medical charts of patients treated with 1 of these second-line immunosuppressors: cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or tacrolimus (TAC) were reviewed. Patients were divided into CYC (n = 24), MMF (n = 20), and TAC (n = 12) groups according to the second-line therapy administered. Baseline characteristics, immune status, immunocomplex deposition in the renal tissue, and treatment outcomes were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ratio of patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in the CYC, MMF, and TAC groups did not differ significantly (<em>P</em> = 0.721). The immunofluorescence assay did not show any significant differences in immunocomplex deposition identified in renal biopsy specimens among the 3 groups. The rate of steroid-free remission in the TAC group (75%) was higher than that in the MMF (55%) and CYC (25%) groups (<em>P</em> = 0.012). At the last follow-up, two-thirds of children in the TAC group had a relapse following discontinuation of therapy. In the TAC group, patients for whom steroids were withdrawn had significantly higher levels of immunoglobulin G at the onset of nephrotic syndrome than those for whom steroids were continued (<em>P</em> = 0.017). In the MMF group, children with relapse had a significantly higher percentage of CD16<sup>+</sup>CD56<sup>+</sup>-positive cells than those without relapse (<em>P</em> = 0.042). The relapse rate after treatment discontinuation was significantly different among the 3 groups (<em>P</em> = 0.035). Notably, the relapse rate after treatment discontinuation in the CYC group was lower than those in the other 2 groups (<em>P</em> = 0.035).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this small population of Chinese patients with childhood refractory MCNS, the relapse rate following TAC therapy was higher than that following MMF or CYC therapy. Different proportions of CD16<sup>+</sup>CD56<sup>+</sup>-positive cells might be associated with relapse rates in patients with MCNS receiving MMF treatment. (<em>Curr Ther Res Clin Exp</em>. 2022; 83:XXX–XXX)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10920,"journal":{"name":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 100671"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X22000108/pdfft?md5=915977ab55f1a3b9b7c71297d1b524ff&pid=1-s2.0-S0011393X22000108-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X22000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Most patients (≥85%) with minimal-change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) respond to corticosteroid treatment. However, about 10% to 20% of patients with MCNS have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and 25% to 43% of patients have steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome or frequent-relapse steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Patients with refractory MCNS are treated with various second-line therapies.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the associations between the use of various second-line therapies and relapse rates in Chinese patients with childhood refractory MCNS.

Methods

In this study, patients with childhood nephrotic syndrome renal biopsy proved to be “minimal change” from a single tertiary-care center between January 2002 and July 2018 were identified. A Total of 56 medical charts of patients treated with 1 of these second-line immunosuppressors: cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or tacrolimus (TAC) were reviewed. Patients were divided into CYC (n = 24), MMF (n = 20), and TAC (n = 12) groups according to the second-line therapy administered. Baseline characteristics, immune status, immunocomplex deposition in the renal tissue, and treatment outcomes were analyzed.

Results

The ratio of patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in the CYC, MMF, and TAC groups did not differ significantly (P = 0.721). The immunofluorescence assay did not show any significant differences in immunocomplex deposition identified in renal biopsy specimens among the 3 groups. The rate of steroid-free remission in the TAC group (75%) was higher than that in the MMF (55%) and CYC (25%) groups (P = 0.012). At the last follow-up, two-thirds of children in the TAC group had a relapse following discontinuation of therapy. In the TAC group, patients for whom steroids were withdrawn had significantly higher levels of immunoglobulin G at the onset of nephrotic syndrome than those for whom steroids were continued (P = 0.017). In the MMF group, children with relapse had a significantly higher percentage of CD16+CD56+-positive cells than those without relapse (P = 0.042). The relapse rate after treatment discontinuation was significantly different among the 3 groups (P = 0.035). Notably, the relapse rate after treatment discontinuation in the CYC group was lower than those in the other 2 groups (P = 0.035).

Conclusions

In this small population of Chinese patients with childhood refractory MCNS, the relapse rate following TAC therapy was higher than that following MMF or CYC therapy. Different proportions of CD16+CD56+-positive cells might be associated with relapse rates in patients with MCNS receiving MMF treatment. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2022; 83:XXX–XXX)

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
停止二线治疗与儿童难治性最小改变肾病综合征复发率之间的关系:一项单中心回顾性图表回顾
大多数(≥85%)最小变化肾病综合征(MCNS)患者对皮质类固醇治疗有反应。然而,大约10% - 20%的MCNS患者有类固醇抵抗性肾病综合征,25% - 43%的患者有类固醇依赖性肾病综合征或频繁复发的类固醇敏感肾病综合征。难治性MCNS患者接受各种二线治疗。目的本研究旨在评估中国儿童难治性MCNS患者使用各种二线治疗与复发率之间的关系。方法在本研究中,确定了2002年1月至2018年7月期间来自单一三级保健中心的儿童肾病综合征肾活检证明“最小变化”的患者。本文回顾了56例患者接受1种二线免疫抑制剂治疗的病历:环磷酰胺(CYC)、霉酚酸酯(MMF)或他克莫司(TAC)。根据给予的二线治疗将患者分为CYC组(n = 24)、MMF组(n = 20)和TAC组(n = 12)。分析基线特征、免疫状态、肾组织免疫复合物沉积和治疗结果。结果CYC组、MMF组和TAC组发生类固醇抵抗性肾病综合征和类固醇依赖性肾病综合征的患者比例差异无统计学意义(P = 0.721)。免疫荧光检测显示三组肾活检标本中免疫复合物沉积无显著差异。TAC组无类固醇缓解率(75%)高于MMF组(55%)和CYC组(25%)(P = 0.012)。在最后一次随访中,TAC组中三分之二的儿童在停止治疗后复发。在TAC组中,停用类固醇的患者在肾病综合征发病时的免疫球蛋白G水平明显高于继续使用类固醇的患者(P = 0.017)。在MMF组中,复发儿童的CD16+CD56+阳性细胞比例明显高于未复发儿童(P = 0.042)。三组患者停药后复发率差异有统计学意义(P = 0.035)。CYC组停药后复发率明显低于其他两组(P = 0.035)。结论在这一小部分中国儿童难治性MCNS患者中,TAC治疗后的复发率高于MMF或CYC治疗后的复发率。在接受MMF治疗的MCNS患者中,不同比例的CD16+CD56+阳性细胞可能与复发率有关。(中国临床医学杂志,2022;83: XXX-XXX)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: We also encourage the submission of manuscripts presenting preclinical and very preliminary research that may stimulate further investigation of potentially relevant findings, as well as in-depth review articles on specific therapies or disease states, and applied health delivery or pharmacoeconomics. CTR encourages and supports the submission of manuscripts describing: • Interventions designed to understand or improve human health, disease treatment or disease prevention; • Studies that focus on problems that are uncommon in resource-rich countries; • Research that is "under-published" because of limited access to monetary resources such as English language support and Open Access fees (CTR offers deeply discounted English language editing); • Republication of articles previously published in non-English journals (eg, evidence-based guidelines) which could be useful if translated into English; • Preclinical and clinical product development studies that are not pursued for further investigation based upon early phase results.
期刊最新文献
Inhibitory effects of heat-killed lactic acid bacterium Enterococcus faecalis on the growth of Porphyromonas gingivalis Potentially Inappropriate Medications Use and Associated Factors Among Older Patients on Follow-Up at the Chronic Care Clinic of Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Eastern Ethiopia A Narrative Review of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Response in the Kingdom of Bahrain Effects of Low-Dose Glucagon on Subcutaneous Insulin Absorption in Pigs Efficacy and Safety of Triple Therapy of Telmisartan/Amlodipine/Rosuvastatin in Patients with Dyslipidemia and Hypertension: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1