Estudio comparativo de las decisiones de los magistrados del Tribunal Supremo español y los resultados de estudios empíricos sobre las implicaciones psicológicas en menores en situación de guarda y custodia compartida

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW Anuario De Psicologia Juridica Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apj.2016.11.002
Marta Marín , Víctor Dujo , Pedro José Horcajo
{"title":"Estudio comparativo de las decisiones de los magistrados del Tribunal Supremo español y los resultados de estudios empíricos sobre las implicaciones psicológicas en menores en situación de guarda y custodia compartida","authors":"Marta Marín ,&nbsp;Víctor Dujo ,&nbsp;Pedro José Horcajo","doi":"10.1016/j.apj.2016.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study takes as a reference the change of Law 15/2005 in the Spanish Civil Code where the concept of shared custody was first introduced in Spain. The objective of this study is to check if a relationship exists between the results of investigations with an empirical base and the judicial decision when considering the effects that shared custody produces in children. With that objective in mind we carried out a qualitative analysis of the investigations related to joint custody consequences, both at national and international level. Then, after carrying out an analysis of the jurisprudence of the Spanish Supreme Court from 2005 to 2015, we compared the results of the investigations with judges’ decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 115-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.apj.2016.11.002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1133074017300028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The present study takes as a reference the change of Law 15/2005 in the Spanish Civil Code where the concept of shared custody was first introduced in Spain. The objective of this study is to check if a relationship exists between the results of investigations with an empirical base and the judicial decision when considering the effects that shared custody produces in children. With that objective in mind we carried out a qualitative analysis of the investigations related to joint custody consequences, both at national and international level. Then, after carrying out an analysis of the jurisprudence of the Spanish Supreme Court from 2005 to 2015, we compared the results of the investigations with judges’ decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较西班牙最高法院法官的决定和关于监护和共同监护未成年人的心理影响的实证研究结果
本研究参考了西班牙民法典第15/2005号法律的变化,其中首次引入了共同监护的概念。本研究的目的是检验在考虑共同监护权对儿童产生的影响时,具有经验基础的调查结果与司法判决之间是否存在关系。考虑到这一目标,我们在国家和国际一级对有关共同监护后果的调查进行了定性分析。然后,我们对2005年至2015年西班牙最高法院的判例进行了分析,并将调查结果与法官的判决进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
El Odio y la Violencia hacia el Exogrupo. Análisis Psicosocial de una Muestra de Personas Condenadas por Delitos de Odio Profiles of Adolescents who Abuse their Parents: A Gender-based Analysis Los Factores Psicosociales en el Suicidio de Presos en Prisiones Europeas: una Revisión Sistemática y Metaanálisis Desconexión Moral y Delincuencia en Población Penitenciaria Adulta: una Revisión Metaanalítica Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance of the Mechanisms of the Moral Disengagement Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1