Cognición, emoción y mentira: implicaciones para detectar el engaño

IF 0.9 4区社会学 Q2 LAW Anuario De Psicologia Juridica Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apj.2017.02.004

Iris Blandón-Gitlin , Rafael M. López , Jaume Masip , Elise Fenn

{"title":"Cognición, emoción y mentira: implicaciones para detectar el engaño","authors":"Iris Blandón-Gitlin , Rafael M. López , Jaume Masip , Elise Fenn","doi":"10.1016/j.apj.2017.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recently, the dearth of evidence supporting nonverbal-emotional approach to lie detection has favored the development of cognitive orientation. According to cognitive orientation, lying is cognitively more complex than truth telling, such that an artificial increase of cognitive difficulty during an interview will lead liars to show indicators of cognitive overload. In this paper we argue that lying is not always more cognitively difficult than telling the truth. Automatically inferring deception from the observation of cognitive load indicators may lead to erroneous judgments. Practitioners must know how memory and the human cognitive system work, so they can understand the actual meaning of cognitive load indicators. Scientists should develop cognitive models of deception to guide their research, and should base their research hypotheses on specific cognitive mechanisms and processes. Finally, because emotions influence cognition, the role of emotions in lie detection cannot be neglected.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 95-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.apj.2017.02.004","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1133074017300193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

Abstract

Recently, the dearth of evidence supporting nonverbal-emotional approach to lie detection has favored the development of cognitive orientation. According to cognitive orientation, lying is cognitively more complex than truth telling, such that an artificial increase of cognitive difficulty during an interview will lead liars to show indicators of cognitive overload. In this paper we argue that lying is not always more cognitively difficult than telling the truth. Automatically inferring deception from the observation of cognitive load indicators may lead to erroneous judgments. Practitioners must know how memory and the human cognitive system work, so they can understand the actual meaning of cognitive load indicators. Scientists should develop cognitive models of deception to guide their research, and should base their research hypotheses on specific cognitive mechanisms and processes. Finally, because emotions influence cognition, the role of emotions in lie detection cannot be neglected.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

认知、情感和谎言:检测欺骗的含义

最近，缺乏证据支持非语言-情感方法的测谎倾向于认知取向的发展。根据认知取向，说谎在认知上比讲真话更复杂，因此在面试中人为地增加认知难度会导致说谎者表现出认知超载的迹象。在这篇论文中，我们认为说谎并不总是比说实话更难认知。从认知负荷指标的观察中自动推断欺骗行为可能导致错误的判断。从业者必须知道记忆和人类认知系统是如何工作的，这样他们才能理解认知负荷指标的实际含义。科学家应该建立欺骗的认知模型来指导他们的研究，并将他们的研究假设建立在特定的认知机制和过程之上。最后，由于情绪影响认知，情绪在测谎中的作用不容忽视。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊