Effects of rhBMP-2 with various carriers on maxillofacial bone regeneration through computed tomography evaluation.

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1186/s40902-023-00405-6
Ja In Seo, Ji Hye Lim, Woo Min Jo, Jeong Keun Lee, Seung Il Song
{"title":"Effects of rhBMP-2 with various carriers on maxillofacial bone regeneration through computed tomography evaluation.","authors":"Ja In Seo,&nbsp;Ji Hye Lim,&nbsp;Woo Min Jo,&nbsp;Jeong Keun Lee,&nbsp;Seung Il Song","doi":"10.1186/s40902-023-00405-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>rhBMP-2 is regarded as the most potent osteoinductive growth factor, and it has been used in the oral cavity with different carriers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the bone-regenerative effect of rhBMP-2 delivered with different carrier systems through three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 112 patients underwent oral surgery with rhBMP-2 application (Group 1, n = 53) or without rhBMP-2 application (Group 2, n = 59). Group 1 was divided into 3 groups according to carriers, rhBMP-2 with allograft (Group 1-1, n = 34), rhBMP-2 with xenograft (Group 1-2, n = 5), and rhBMP-2 with absorbable collagen sponge (Group 1-3, n = 14). Cone beam computed tomography scans were taken before surgery (T0) 6 months after surgery (T1). The volume of defects was measured through the three-dimensional image analysis tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average bone regeneration rate of Group 1 was significantly greater than that of Group 2. Within Group 1, the group that used allograft as a carrier (Group 1-1) showed significantly higher bone regeneration rates than the group that used absorbable collagen sponge as a carrier (Group 1-3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of rhBMP-2 after oral surgery results in a superior bone regeneration rate compared to not using rhBMP-2, and its efficacy depends on the carriers it is used with. Allograft affects bone regeneration more than absorbable collagen sponge when it is carried with rhBMP-2. Therefore, the appropriate use of rhBMP-2 with suitable bone grafting materials is useful for promoting postoperative bone regeneration in oral surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00405-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: rhBMP-2 is regarded as the most potent osteoinductive growth factor, and it has been used in the oral cavity with different carriers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the bone-regenerative effect of rhBMP-2 delivered with different carrier systems through three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography analysis.

Method: A total of 112 patients underwent oral surgery with rhBMP-2 application (Group 1, n = 53) or without rhBMP-2 application (Group 2, n = 59). Group 1 was divided into 3 groups according to carriers, rhBMP-2 with allograft (Group 1-1, n = 34), rhBMP-2 with xenograft (Group 1-2, n = 5), and rhBMP-2 with absorbable collagen sponge (Group 1-3, n = 14). Cone beam computed tomography scans were taken before surgery (T0) 6 months after surgery (T1). The volume of defects was measured through the three-dimensional image analysis tool.

Results: The average bone regeneration rate of Group 1 was significantly greater than that of Group 2. Within Group 1, the group that used allograft as a carrier (Group 1-1) showed significantly higher bone regeneration rates than the group that used absorbable collagen sponge as a carrier (Group 1-3).

Conclusion: The use of rhBMP-2 after oral surgery results in a superior bone regeneration rate compared to not using rhBMP-2, and its efficacy depends on the carriers it is used with. Allograft affects bone regeneration more than absorbable collagen sponge when it is carried with rhBMP-2. Therefore, the appropriate use of rhBMP-2 with suitable bone grafting materials is useful for promoting postoperative bone regeneration in oral surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过计算机断层扫描评估rhBMP-2与各种载体对颌面骨再生的影响。
背景:rhBMP-2被认为是最有效的骨诱导生长因子,它已被不同载体应用于口腔。本研究的目的是通过三维锥束计算机断层扫描分析,评估不同载体系统递送的rhBMP-2的骨再生效果。方法:共有112例患者接受了应用rhBMP-2的口腔手术(第1组 = 53)或不施用rhBMP-2(组2 = 59)。第1组按载体分为3组,rhBMP-2与同种异体骨移植(1-1组 = 34),rhBMP-2与异种移植物(组1-2,n = 5) ,和rhBMP-2与可吸收胶原海绵(1-3组,n = 14) 。术前(T0)、术后6个月(T1)进行锥束计算机断层扫描。通过三维图像分析工具测量缺陷的体积。结果:第1组的平均骨再生率明显高于第2组。在第1组中,使用同种异体移植物作为载体的组(1-1组)的骨再生率明显高于使用可吸收胶原海绵作为载体的对照组(1-3组)。当与rhBMP-2一起携带时,同种异体移植物比可吸收的胶原海绵更能影响骨再生。因此,在口腔外科手术中,适当使用rhBMP-2和合适的骨移植材料有助于促进术后骨再生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A retrospective epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures at a tertiary referral hospital in istanbul: a seven-year study of 1,757 patients. Egyptian patients with cleft lip: our experience with primary rhinoplasty. Volume changes in the contralateral submandibular gland following unilateral gland excision in oral cancer patients. Clinical outcomes of NBF gel application in managing mucositis associated with xerostomia. Changes in mandibular width and frontal-lower facial profile after orthognathic surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with removal of internal bone interference in patients with class III skeletal malocclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1