Validity and reliability study of the Turkish Personal Report of Intercultural Communication Apprehension Scale: a revised scale.

IF 1.6 Q2 NURSING Journal of Research in Nursing Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1177/17449871231191970
Nihan Türkoğlu, Esin Kavuran, Eda Ay
{"title":"Validity and reliability study of the Turkish Personal Report of Intercultural Communication Apprehension Scale: a revised scale.","authors":"Nihan Türkoğlu, Esin Kavuran, Eda Ay","doi":"10.1177/17449871231191970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intercultural communication is one of the most important competencies of nurses that enhances the health-care process and increases the quality of care in multicultural environments.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study was conducted to revise the Turkish Personal Report of Intercultural Communication Apprehension Scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This methodological study was conducted between November and December 2021 with 321 female and 96 male university students (mean age 20.78 ± 2.04 (min. = 17, max. = 37)). Revision of the Turkish Personal Report of Intercultural Communication Apprehension Scale included factor analysis, test-retest analysis for reliability, correlation-based item analysis, Cronbach's alpha internal consistency analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis results showed that the scale was composed of 12 items and explained 56.79% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was found to be 0.88. Internal consistency analysis included item-total score correlations; the values were found to range between -0.59 and 0.79 and the 14th item with negative item-total score correlations was excluded from the scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study show that the revised Turkish Personal Report of Intercultural Communication Apprehension Scale is a valid and reliable tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":"28 5","pages":"324-334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871231191970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intercultural communication is one of the most important competencies of nurses that enhances the health-care process and increases the quality of care in multicultural environments.

Aims: This study was conducted to revise the Turkish Personal Report of Intercultural Communication Apprehension Scale.

Methods: This methodological study was conducted between November and December 2021 with 321 female and 96 male university students (mean age 20.78 ± 2.04 (min. = 17, max. = 37)). Revision of the Turkish Personal Report of Intercultural Communication Apprehension Scale included factor analysis, test-retest analysis for reliability, correlation-based item analysis, Cronbach's alpha internal consistency analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.

Results: Analysis results showed that the scale was composed of 12 items and explained 56.79% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was found to be 0.88. Internal consistency analysis included item-total score correlations; the values were found to range between -0.59 and 0.79 and the 14th item with negative item-total score correlations was excluded from the scale.

Conclusion: The results of this study show that the revised Turkish Personal Report of Intercultural Communication Apprehension Scale is a valid and reliable tool.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其跨文化交际理解量表个人报告的信度和有效性研究:修订量表。
背景:跨文化交流是护士最重要的能力之一,可以在多文化环境中加强医疗保健过程并提高护理质量。目的:本研究旨在修订土耳其跨文化交际理解量表个人报告。方法:本方法研究于2021年11月至12月进行,共有321名女性和96名男性大学生(平均年龄20.78岁)参加 ± 2.04(最小值。 = 最大17。 = 37))。土耳其跨文化交际理解量表个人报告的修订包括因素分析、信度重测分析、基于相关性的项目分析、Cronbachα内部一致性分析和验证性因素分析。结果:分析结果表明,量表由12个项目组成,解释了56.79%的总方差。该量表的克朗巴赫α值为0.88。内部一致性分析包括项目总分相关性;发现这些值在-0.59和0.79之间,第14个项目总分呈负相关的项目被排除在量表之外。结论:本研究结果表明,修订后的土耳其跨文化交际理解量表是一种有效、可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
期刊最新文献
Commentary: Nurses' attitudes towards safety and their association with nurses' perceptions of adverse events and quality of care: a cross-sectional study. Commentary: Relationship between resilience, social support and psychological well-being in nursing students. Nurses' attitudes towards safety and their association with nurses' perceptions of adverse events and quality of care: a cross-sectional study. Relationship between resilience, social support and psychological well-being in nursing students. Commentary: Conceptualising nursing theory and practice within a local cultural and professional context: a methodological example to inform theory development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1