Satisfaction with Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Requiring Insulin Treatment in Buenos Aires, Argentina

Andrés Pichon-Riviere MD, MSc, PhD , Vilma Irazola MD, MSc , Andrea Beratarrechea MD , Andrea Alcaraz MD, MSc , Carolina Carrara MD
{"title":"Satisfaction with Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Requiring Insulin Treatment in Buenos Aires, Argentina","authors":"Andrés Pichon-Riviere MD, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Vilma Irazola MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Andrea Beratarrechea MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Alcaraz MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Carolina Carrara MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ehrm.2012.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>To assess different dimensions of treatment satisfaction </span>in patients<span> with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving insulin therapy.</span></p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study. We included 183 patients with T2DM followed by diabetes specialists in an ambulatory setting: 93 treated with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin<span> (NPH) and 90 with insulin glargine (IG). We used a Spanish version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) for Argentina.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall treatment satisfaction was 30.04 (SD 5.40) for a maximum score of 36. The lowest score observed was for the satisfaction item “Flexibility of treatment” (4.7 out of 6, SD 1.27), and the highest score for the item “Recommending treatment to others” (5.39 out of 6, SD 1.23). In patients treated with IG, the overall treatment satisfaction score was 30.56 (SD 4.43); and 29.64 (SD 6.13) for those receiving NPH, not reaching a statistically significant difference. Perception of hypoglycemia was infrequent, with a mean score of 1.82 out of 6 (SD 1.62). For hyperglycemia, the mean score was 2.62 out of 6 (SD 1.54). In both cases, we found no difference between patients treated with IG and those treated with NPH insulin.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This is the first study describing patient satisfaction with treatment in T2DM patients in Argentina. We have found levels of treatment satisfaction similar or greater to those described in developed countries. We expect that the results of this study may encourage physicians not to delay the initiation of insulin therapy in poorly controlled patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88882,"journal":{"name":"Health outcomes research in medicine","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages e231-e237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2012.11.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health outcomes research in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131912000481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To assess different dimensions of treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving insulin therapy.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study. We included 183 patients with T2DM followed by diabetes specialists in an ambulatory setting: 93 treated with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH) and 90 with insulin glargine (IG). We used a Spanish version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) for Argentina.

Results

Overall treatment satisfaction was 30.04 (SD 5.40) for a maximum score of 36. The lowest score observed was for the satisfaction item “Flexibility of treatment” (4.7 out of 6, SD 1.27), and the highest score for the item “Recommending treatment to others” (5.39 out of 6, SD 1.23). In patients treated with IG, the overall treatment satisfaction score was 30.56 (SD 4.43); and 29.64 (SD 6.13) for those receiving NPH, not reaching a statistically significant difference. Perception of hypoglycemia was infrequent, with a mean score of 1.82 out of 6 (SD 1.62). For hyperglycemia, the mean score was 2.62 out of 6 (SD 1.54). In both cases, we found no difference between patients treated with IG and those treated with NPH insulin.

Conclusion

This is the first study describing patient satisfaction with treatment in T2DM patients in Argentina. We have found levels of treatment satisfaction similar or greater to those described in developed countries. We expect that the results of this study may encourage physicians not to delay the initiation of insulin therapy in poorly controlled patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯2型糖尿病患者对胰岛素治疗的满意度
目的评价2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者胰岛素治疗满意度的不同维度。研究设计横断面研究。我们纳入了183例T2DM患者,由糖尿病专家在门诊随访:93例接受中性鱼精蛋白Hagedorn胰岛素(NPH)治疗,90例接受甘精胰岛素(IG)治疗。我们在阿根廷使用西班牙语版的糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQ)。结果患者总体治疗满意度为30.04 (SD 5.40),最高评分为36分。得分最低的是满意度项目“治疗的灵活性”(4.7分,SD 1.27),得分最高的是“向他人推荐治疗”(5.39分,SD 1.23)。IG患者的总体治疗满意度评分为30.56分(SD 4.43);NPH组为29.64 (SD 6.13),差异无统计学意义。低血糖的感觉并不常见,平均得分为1.82分(SD 1.62)。对于高血糖,平均评分为2.62分(SD 1.54)。在这两种情况下,我们发现IG和NPH胰岛素治疗的患者之间没有差异。结论:这是阿根廷第一个描述T2DM患者治疗满意度的研究。我们发现治疗满意度水平与发达国家相似或更高。我们希望这项研究的结果可以鼓励医生不要延迟胰岛素治疗的开始对控制不良的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: Utility and Work Productivity Data for Economic Evaluation of Breast Cancer Therapies in the Netherlands and Sweden Health Care Utilization and Costs among Medicaid-enrolled Patients with Schizophrenia Experiencing Multiple Psychiatric Relapses Outcomes-based Risk-sharing Schemes: Is There a Potential Role in the Asia-Pacific Markets? Comparative Effectiveness of On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Among Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Long-term Adherence to Hormone Therapy in Medicaid-enrolled Women with Breast Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1