Proposal, design, and evaluation of a values-based online survey

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT EURO Journal on Decision Processes Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejdp.2022.100015
S.L. Philpot , C.T. Philpot , K.W. Hipel , P.A. Johnson
{"title":"Proposal, design, and evaluation of a values-based online survey","authors":"S.L. Philpot ,&nbsp;C.T. Philpot ,&nbsp;K.W. Hipel ,&nbsp;P.A. Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.ejdp.2022.100015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A values-informed modeling software program is proposed and developed for enhancing online surveys. The authors explore a method to prompt users to examine the interactions between their preferences over a set of alternatives and their values in an online survey. The authors first present the underlying theories, design parameters, and features used to prompt values-informed thinking in participants. We then describe our exploratory test of an early version of P2P-DSS. In this test, fifteen participants used the system to provide their input on a decision about aggregate mining and then completed a post-task questionnaire. The authors integrated realistic problem constraints and end user feedback early in the design of P2P-DSS by addressing a real-world decision. Some participants indicate that P2P-DSS helped them to express their own preferences. P2P-DSS may also have encouraged some people to consider preferences they disagreed with. Participants also identified opportunities to improve the user experience. While focused on a real decision, the goal was to elicit feedback on an early design of P2P-DSS, not to conduct a case study. This work will inform redesigns and examinations of P2P-DSS specifically and sets the stage for further studies into a role for values activation in online surveys and decision support.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44104,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943822000048/pdfft?md5=006d0d354d55b73af6667172f0079903&pid=1-s2.0-S2193943822000048-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943822000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A values-informed modeling software program is proposed and developed for enhancing online surveys. The authors explore a method to prompt users to examine the interactions between their preferences over a set of alternatives and their values in an online survey. The authors first present the underlying theories, design parameters, and features used to prompt values-informed thinking in participants. We then describe our exploratory test of an early version of P2P-DSS. In this test, fifteen participants used the system to provide their input on a decision about aggregate mining and then completed a post-task questionnaire. The authors integrated realistic problem constraints and end user feedback early in the design of P2P-DSS by addressing a real-world decision. Some participants indicate that P2P-DSS helped them to express their own preferences. P2P-DSS may also have encouraged some people to consider preferences they disagreed with. Participants also identified opportunities to improve the user experience. While focused on a real decision, the goal was to elicit feedback on an early design of P2P-DSS, not to conduct a case study. This work will inform redesigns and examinations of P2P-DSS specifically and sets the stage for further studies into a role for values activation in online surveys and decision support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建议、设计和评估一个基于价值观的在线调查
提出并开发了一种价值信息建模软件程序,以增强在线调查。作者探索了一种方法,促使用户在一项在线调查中检查他们对一系列选择的偏好与他们的价值观之间的相互作用。作者首先提出了潜在的理论、设计参数和特征,用于提示参与者的价值知情思维。然后,我们描述了我们对P2P-DSS早期版本的探索性测试。在这个测试中,15名参与者使用该系统提供他们对汇总采矿决策的输入,然后完成任务后问卷调查。作者通过解决现实世界的决策,在P2P-DSS设计的早期集成了现实问题约束和最终用户反馈。有些参与者表示,P2P-DSS帮助他们表达自己的喜好。P2P-DSS也可能鼓励一些人考虑他们不同意的偏好。与会者还确定了改善用户体验的机会。虽然专注于一个真正的决策,但目标是获取关于P2P-DSS早期设计的反馈,而不是进行案例研究。这项工作将特别为P2P-DSS的重新设计和检查提供信息,并为进一步研究价值观激活在在线调查和决策支持中的作用奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Feature Issue on Fair and Explainable Decision Support Systems Editorial: Feature issue on fair and explainable decision support systems Corrigendum to “Multi-objective optimization in real-time operation of rainwater harvesting systems” [EURO Journal on Decision Processes Volume 11 (2023) 100039] Multiobjective combinatorial optimization with interactive evolutionary algorithms: The case of facility location problems Performance assessment of waste sorting: Component-based approach to incorporate quality into data envelopment analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1