Systemic perfusion at peak incremental exercise in left ventricular assist device recipients: Partitioning pump and native left ventricle relative contribution
Alessandro Mezzani , Massimo Pistono , Ugo Corrà , Andrea Giordano , Marco Gnemmi , Alessandro Imparato , Paolo Centofanti , Mauro Rinaldi , Silvia Colombo , Elena Canal , Pantaleo Giannuzzi
{"title":"Systemic perfusion at peak incremental exercise in left ventricular assist device recipients: Partitioning pump and native left ventricle relative contribution","authors":"Alessandro Mezzani , Massimo Pistono , Ugo Corrà , Andrea Giordano , Marco Gnemmi , Alessandro Imparato , Paolo Centofanti , Mauro Rinaldi , Silvia Colombo , Elena Canal , Pantaleo Giannuzzi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients, little is known about the relative pump- and left ventricle-generated blood flow (PBF and LVBF, respectively) contribution to peak systemic perfusion during incremental exercise and about how PBF/LVBF interplay and exercise capacity may be affected by pump speed increase.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-two LVAD recipients underwent ramp cardiopulmonary exercise tests at fixed and increasing pump speed (+ 1.5% of baseline speed/10 W workload increase), echocardiography and NT-proBNP dosage. Peak systemic perfusion was peak VO<sub>2</sub>/estimated peak arterio-venous O<sub>2</sub> difference, and LVBF was systemic perfusion minus PBF provided by LVAD controller. A change of peak percentage of predicted VO<sub>2max</sub> (Δpeak%VO<sub>2</sub>) ≥ 3 in increasing- vs. fixed-speed test was considered significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and NT-proBNP were significantly lower and higher, respectively, in Δpeak%VO<sub>2</sub> < 3 than ≥ 3. A LVBF contribution to systemic perfusion significantly larger than that of PBF was observed in Δpeak%VO<sub>2</sub> ≥ 3 vs. < 3 in fixed-speed test, which was further amplified in increasing-speed test (2.4 ± 1.7 l/min vs. 2.0 ± 1.5 l/min and 0.8 ± 2.2 l/min vs. 1.3 ± 2.3 l/min, respectively, p for trend < 0.0005). Among several clinical-instrumental parameters, logistic regression selected only TAPSE > 13 mm as a predictor of Δpeak%VO<sub>2</sub> ≥ 3.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A significant LVBF contribution to peak systemic perfusion and pump speed increase-induced peak VO<sub>2</sub> improvement was detectable only in patients with a more preserved right ventricular systolic function and stable hemodynamic picture. These findings should be taken into consideration when designing LVAD controllers aiming to increase pump speed according to increasing exercise demands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90542,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology. Heart & vessels","volume":"4 ","pages":"Pages 40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.07.004","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology. Heart & vessels","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214763214000571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract
Background
In continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients, little is known about the relative pump- and left ventricle-generated blood flow (PBF and LVBF, respectively) contribution to peak systemic perfusion during incremental exercise and about how PBF/LVBF interplay and exercise capacity may be affected by pump speed increase.
Methods
Twenty-two LVAD recipients underwent ramp cardiopulmonary exercise tests at fixed and increasing pump speed (+ 1.5% of baseline speed/10 W workload increase), echocardiography and NT-proBNP dosage. Peak systemic perfusion was peak VO2/estimated peak arterio-venous O2 difference, and LVBF was systemic perfusion minus PBF provided by LVAD controller. A change of peak percentage of predicted VO2max (Δpeak%VO2) ≥ 3 in increasing- vs. fixed-speed test was considered significant.
Results
Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and NT-proBNP were significantly lower and higher, respectively, in Δpeak%VO2 < 3 than ≥ 3. A LVBF contribution to systemic perfusion significantly larger than that of PBF was observed in Δpeak%VO2 ≥ 3 vs. < 3 in fixed-speed test, which was further amplified in increasing-speed test (2.4 ± 1.7 l/min vs. 2.0 ± 1.5 l/min and 0.8 ± 2.2 l/min vs. 1.3 ± 2.3 l/min, respectively, p for trend < 0.0005). Among several clinical-instrumental parameters, logistic regression selected only TAPSE > 13 mm as a predictor of Δpeak%VO2 ≥ 3.
Conclusions
A significant LVBF contribution to peak systemic perfusion and pump speed increase-induced peak VO2 improvement was detectable only in patients with a more preserved right ventricular systolic function and stable hemodynamic picture. These findings should be taken into consideration when designing LVAD controllers aiming to increase pump speed according to increasing exercise demands.
在连续血流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)接受者中,关于在增量运动期间泵和左心室产生的相对血流量(分别为PBF和LVBF)对全身灌注峰值的贡献以及PBF/LVBF如何相互作用和运动能力可能受到泵速增加的影响知之甚少。方法22例LVAD受者分别在固定和增加泵速(+ 1.5%基线速度/10 W工作量增加)、超声心动图和NT-proBNP剂量下进行斜坡式心肺运动试验。全身灌注峰值为峰值VO2/估计峰值动静脉O2差值,LVBF为全身灌注减去LVAD控制器提供的PBF。在变速与定速试验中,预测VO2max的峰值百分比(Δpeak%VO2)≥3的变化被认为是显著的。结果:Δpeak%VO2和lt时,心肌环面收缩偏移(TAPSE)和NT-proBNP分别显著降低和升高;3比≥3。在Δpeak%VO2≥3 vs. <时,LVBF对全身灌注的贡献明显大于PBF;3在定速试验中,在提速试验中进一步放大(分别为2.4±1.7 l/min vs. 2.0±1.5 l/min和0.8±2.2 l/min vs. 1.3±2.3 l/min, p为趋势和lt;0.0005)。在几个临床仪器参数中,逻辑回归只选择了TAPSE >13mm作为Δpeak%VO2≥3的预测因子。结论LVBF对全身灌注峰值和泵速增加引起的峰值VO2改善的显著贡献仅在右室收缩功能保存较好且血流动力学图像稳定的患者中可见。在设计LVAD控制器时应考虑到这些发现,目的是根据不断增加的运动需求来提高泵速。