Dust devils and dustless vortices on a desert playa observed with surface pressure and solar flux logging

GeoResJ Pub Date : 2015-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.grj.2014.11.002
Ralph D. Lorenz , Brian K. Jackson
{"title":"Dust devils and dustless vortices on a desert playa observed with surface pressure and solar flux logging","authors":"Ralph D. Lorenz ,&nbsp;Brian K. Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.grj.2014.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dust devils are convective vortices rendered visible by lofted dust, and may be a significant means of injecting dust into the atmosphere, on both Earth and Mars. The fraction of vortices that are dust-laden is not well-understood, however. Here we report a May/June 2013 survey on a Nevada desert playa using small stations that record pressure and solar flux with high time resolution (2<!--> <!-->Hz): these data allow detection of vortices and an estimate of the dust opacity of the subset of vortices that geometrically occult the sun. The encounter rate of vortex pressure drops of 0.3<!--> <!-->hPa or larger is 50–80 per 100<!--> <!-->days, with 0.6<!--> <!-->hPa or larger drops occurring about 3<!--> <!-->times less often. Obscuration events associated with pressure drops occur less frequently, in part because near-misses must be in the sunward direction to cause attenuation of the solar beam and in part because some vortices are not dust-laden. 40% of vortex events had no detectable attenuation, and only 20% of events caused dimming greater than about 2% (a maximum of ∼35%), with stronger dimming tending to occur with larger pressure drops. The distribution suggests dust lifting may be dominated by a few intense devils, complicating estimation of the total flux into the atmosphere.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93099,"journal":{"name":"GeoResJ","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.grj.2014.11.002","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeoResJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214242814000229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Dust devils are convective vortices rendered visible by lofted dust, and may be a significant means of injecting dust into the atmosphere, on both Earth and Mars. The fraction of vortices that are dust-laden is not well-understood, however. Here we report a May/June 2013 survey on a Nevada desert playa using small stations that record pressure and solar flux with high time resolution (2 Hz): these data allow detection of vortices and an estimate of the dust opacity of the subset of vortices that geometrically occult the sun. The encounter rate of vortex pressure drops of 0.3 hPa or larger is 50–80 per 100 days, with 0.6 hPa or larger drops occurring about 3 times less often. Obscuration events associated with pressure drops occur less frequently, in part because near-misses must be in the sunward direction to cause attenuation of the solar beam and in part because some vortices are not dust-laden. 40% of vortex events had no detectable attenuation, and only 20% of events caused dimming greater than about 2% (a maximum of ∼35%), with stronger dimming tending to occur with larger pressure drops. The distribution suggests dust lifting may be dominated by a few intense devils, complicating estimation of the total flux into the atmosphere.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用地表压力和太阳通量测井观察沙漠上的尘卷风和无尘漩涡
尘卷风是由扬起的尘埃形成的对流涡旋,可能是向地球和火星大气中注入尘埃的重要手段。然而,我们还不能很好地了解旋涡中含有尘埃的部分。在这里,我们报告了2013年5月/ 6月对内华达州沙漠playa的一项调查,使用小站点以高时间分辨率(2hz)记录压力和太阳通量:这些数据允许检测漩涡和估计漩涡子集的尘埃不透明度,这些漩涡在几何上遮蔽了太阳。0.3 hPa及以上涡旋压降的遭遇率为50-80次/ 100天,0.6 hPa及以上涡旋压降的发生频率约为3倍。与压力下降相关的遮蔽事件发生的频率较低,部分原因是近距离撞击必须在朝向太阳的方向,以引起太阳光束的衰减,部分原因是一些漩涡不含灰尘。40%的涡旋事件没有可检测到的衰减,只有20%的事件引起的变暗大于2%(最大约35%),更强的变暗倾向于在较大的压降下发生。这种分布表明,尘埃的提升可能主要是由几个强烈的魔鬼控制的,这使对进入大气的总通量的估计复杂化了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Soil legacy data rescue via GlobalSoilMap and other international and national initiatives Design and development of a generic spatial decision support system, based on artificial intelligence and multicriteria decision analysis A re-evaluation of the basal age in the DSDP hole at Site 534, Central Atlantic The application of machine learning for evaluating anthropogenic versus natural climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1