Maximum depth of magnetisation of Australia, its uncertainty, and implications for Curie depth

GeoResJ Pub Date : 2015-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.grj.2015.06.003
Richard Chopping , Brian L.N. Kennett
{"title":"Maximum depth of magnetisation of Australia, its uncertainty, and implications for Curie depth","authors":"Richard Chopping ,&nbsp;Brian L.N. Kennett","doi":"10.1016/j.grj.2015.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Curie depth is the depth at which the crust and uppermost mantle cease to be ferromagnetic or ferromagnetic, the main cause of crustal magnetism, due to the action of geothermal effects. One method to estimate the Curie depth for Australia is to map the base of magnetisation derived from observations of magnetic intensity. We have used a nonlinear direct sampling inverse technique to fully explore the parameter space of a fractal forward model of magnetisation. This produces an ensemble of models that allow us to produce maps of both the maximum depth of magnetisation and its uncertainty for Australia. The base of magnetisation varies significantly across the continent, between 10 and 70<!--> <!-->km depth, with an uncertainty of 7–10<!--> <!-->km. The variations in magnetisation depth conform with the boundaries of geological provinces due to their differing magnetic properties: In general, cratons and older provinces generally show a deeper base of magnetisation results and hence may be inferred to have deeper Curie depths, reflecting that these areas are on the whole cooler. We also find general agreement in our results with known geothermal anomalies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93099,"journal":{"name":"GeoResJ","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 70-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.grj.2015.06.003","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeoResJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214242815000376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

The Curie depth is the depth at which the crust and uppermost mantle cease to be ferromagnetic or ferromagnetic, the main cause of crustal magnetism, due to the action of geothermal effects. One method to estimate the Curie depth for Australia is to map the base of magnetisation derived from observations of magnetic intensity. We have used a nonlinear direct sampling inverse technique to fully explore the parameter space of a fractal forward model of magnetisation. This produces an ensemble of models that allow us to produce maps of both the maximum depth of magnetisation and its uncertainty for Australia. The base of magnetisation varies significantly across the continent, between 10 and 70 km depth, with an uncertainty of 7–10 km. The variations in magnetisation depth conform with the boundaries of geological provinces due to their differing magnetic properties: In general, cratons and older provinces generally show a deeper base of magnetisation results and hence may be inferred to have deeper Curie depths, reflecting that these areas are on the whole cooler. We also find general agreement in our results with known geothermal anomalies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚的最大磁化深度,它的不确定性,以及对居里深度的影响
居里深度是地壳和最上层地幔由于地热效应的作用而不再具有铁磁性或铁磁性的深度。铁磁性是地壳磁性的主要原因。估计澳大利亚居里深度的一种方法是绘制由磁场强度观测得出的磁化基础图。我们利用非线性直接抽样反演技术,对磁化分形正演模型的参数空间进行了充分的探索。这产生了一系列模型,使我们能够绘制出澳大利亚最大磁化深度及其不确定性的地图。整个大陆的磁化基础差异很大,深度在10到70公里之间,不确定性为7到10公里。磁化深度的变化符合地质省的边界,因为它们的磁性不同:一般来说,克拉通和更古老的省通常显示出更深的磁化结果基础,因此可以推断出更深的居里深度,反映了这些地区总体上更冷。我们还发现我们的结果与已知的地热异常基本一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Soil legacy data rescue via GlobalSoilMap and other international and national initiatives Design and development of a generic spatial decision support system, based on artificial intelligence and multicriteria decision analysis A re-evaluation of the basal age in the DSDP hole at Site 534, Central Atlantic The application of machine learning for evaluating anthropogenic versus natural climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1