Rate of Genotypic Mutations and Resistance to Antiretroviral Drugs in a General Hospital

L.C. Fernández Lisón , L.M. Fernández Pereira , S. Romero Chala
{"title":"Rate of Genotypic Mutations and Resistance to Antiretroviral Drugs in a General Hospital","authors":"L.C. Fernández Lisón ,&nbsp;L.M. Fernández Pereira ,&nbsp;S. Romero Chala","doi":"10.1016/j.farmae.2010.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective is to describe the resistance mutation rate in protease<span> and reverse transcriptase genes and sensitivity to different antiretrovirals in our environment.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed an observational descriptive study in which we examined the samples provided at the Clinical Immunology Laboratory between April 2004 and April 2009. We analysed both the resistance tests and the sensitivity to different drugs in patients with therapeutic failure using Trugene HIV-1 Genotyping Kits<sup>®</sup>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span><span>We registered samples from 242 patients, 61 of which had no detectable resistance. The most prevalent mutations according to drug families were: for nucleoside analog<span> reverse transcriptase inhibitors T215A/C/D/F/L/N/S/Y (24.10%), M184G/I/V/W (14.66%), M41J/L/R/T/W (11.24%) and K219E/G/H/N/R/T/W (10.24%). The highest levels of resistance corresponded to </span></span>stavudine<span> and lamivudine/emtricitabine, and tenofovir produced the least resistance in our environment. The non-analogues were K103N/R (23.98%), V179D/E/I/M/T (10.82%), A98E/G/S (10.53%) and K101E/P/Q/R (9.06%). </span></span>Nevirapine presented greater resistance than </span>efavirenz.</p><p>Protease inhibitors were L10F/I/V (15.95%), M36I/L (13.81%), A71I/T/V (13.10%) and 154L/S/V (7.38%). The darunavir/ritonavir combination was that which presented the least resistance, and tipranavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir the most resistance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Antiretroviral resistance and sensitivity to retroviral treatment in our environment was similar to results from other studies in Spain, but differed in the high level of resistance to lamivudine/emtricitabine and lopinavir/ritonavir.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"35 4","pages":"Pages 191-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.farmae.2010.05.003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives

The objective is to describe the resistance mutation rate in protease and reverse transcriptase genes and sensitivity to different antiretrovirals in our environment.

Methods

We performed an observational descriptive study in which we examined the samples provided at the Clinical Immunology Laboratory between April 2004 and April 2009. We analysed both the resistance tests and the sensitivity to different drugs in patients with therapeutic failure using Trugene HIV-1 Genotyping Kits®.

Results

We registered samples from 242 patients, 61 of which had no detectable resistance. The most prevalent mutations according to drug families were: for nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors T215A/C/D/F/L/N/S/Y (24.10%), M184G/I/V/W (14.66%), M41J/L/R/T/W (11.24%) and K219E/G/H/N/R/T/W (10.24%). The highest levels of resistance corresponded to stavudine and lamivudine/emtricitabine, and tenofovir produced the least resistance in our environment. The non-analogues were K103N/R (23.98%), V179D/E/I/M/T (10.82%), A98E/G/S (10.53%) and K101E/P/Q/R (9.06%). Nevirapine presented greater resistance than efavirenz.

Protease inhibitors were L10F/I/V (15.95%), M36I/L (13.81%), A71I/T/V (13.10%) and 154L/S/V (7.38%). The darunavir/ritonavir combination was that which presented the least resistance, and tipranavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir the most resistance.

Conclusions

Antiretroviral resistance and sensitivity to retroviral treatment in our environment was similar to results from other studies in Spain, but differed in the high level of resistance to lamivudine/emtricitabine and lopinavir/ritonavir.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某综合医院基因型突变率与抗逆转录病毒药物耐药性
目的了解人类环境中蛋白酶和逆转录酶基因的耐药突变率及对不同抗逆转录病毒药物的敏感性。方法对2004年4月至2009年4月在临床免疫学实验室提供的样本进行观察性描述性研究。我们使用Trugene HIV-1基因分型试剂盒®分析了治疗失败患者的耐药试验和对不同药物的敏感性。结果242例患者中,61例未检出耐药。按药物家族分类,最常见的突变为核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂T215A/C/D/F/L/N/S/Y(24.10%)、M184G/I/V/W(14.66%)、M41J/L/R/T/W(11.24%)和K219E/G/H/N/R/T/W(10.24%)。耐药性最高的是司他夫定和拉米夫定/恩曲他滨,而替诺福韦在我们的环境中产生的耐药性最低。非类似物分别为K103N/R(23.98%)、V179D/E/I/M/T(10.82%)、A98E/G/S(10.53%)和K101E/P/Q/R(9.06%)。奈韦拉平的耐药性大于依非韦伦。蛋白酶抑制剂分别为L10F/I/V(15.95%)、M36I/L(13.81%)、A71I/T/V(13.10%)和154L/S/V(7.38%)。达那韦/利托那韦联合耐药最少,替普那韦/利托那韦和洛匹那韦/利托那韦耐药最多。结论在我们的环境中,逆转录病毒耐药性和对逆转录病毒治疗的敏感性与西班牙其他研究的结果相似,但不同于对拉米夫定/恩曲他滨和洛匹那韦/利托那韦的高耐药水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity Profile and Adherence to the Pharmacotherapeutic Regimen of Gemcitabine–carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System Effectiveness and Use of Linezolid in Hospitalisation Wards Application of the Technology Web 2.0 in a Drug Information Centre Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1