Monitoring Medication Errors in Personalised Dispensing Using the Sentinel Surveillance System Method

M. Pérez-Cebrián, I. Font-Noguera, L. Doménech-Moral, V. Bosó-Ribelles, P. Romero-Boyero, J.L. Poveda-Andrés
{"title":"Monitoring Medication Errors in Personalised Dispensing Using the Sentinel Surveillance System Method","authors":"M. Pérez-Cebrián,&nbsp;I. Font-Noguera,&nbsp;L. Doménech-Moral,&nbsp;V. Bosó-Ribelles,&nbsp;P. Romero-Boyero,&nbsp;J.L. Poveda-Andrés","doi":"10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the efficacy of a new quality control strategy based on daily randomised sampling and monitoring of a sentinel surveillance<span> system (SSS) medication cart, in order to identify medication errors and their origin at different levels of the process.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Prospective quality control study with one-year follow-up. An SSS medication cart was randomly selected once a week and double-checked before dispensing medication. Medication errors were recorded before the cart was taken to the relevant hospital ward. Information concerning complaints after receiving medication and 24-h monitoring was also noted. Type and origin of error data were assessed by a unit dose quality control group, which proposed relevant improvement measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-four SSS carts were assessed, including 5130 medication lines and 9952 dispensed doses, corresponding to 753 patients. Ninety erroneous lines (1.8%) and 142 mistaken doses (1.4%) were identified at the pharmacy department. The most frequent error was dose duplication (38%) and its main cause was inappropriate management and forgetfulness (69%). Fifty medication complaints (6.6% of patients) were mainly due to new treatment at admission (52%), and 41 (0.8% of all medication lines), did not completely match the prescription (0.6% lines) as recorded by the pharmacy department. Thirty-seven (4.9% of patients) medication complaints due to changes at admission and 32 matching errors (0.6% medication lines) were recorded. The main cause also was inappropriate management and forgetfulness (24%). The simultaneous recording of incidences due to complaints and new medication coincided in 33.3%. In addition, 433 (4.3%) of dispensed doses were returned to the pharmacy department. After the unit dose quality control group conducted their feedback analysis, 64 improvement measures for pharmacy department nurses, 37 for pharmacists, and 24 for the hospital ward were introduced.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The SSS programme has proven to be useful as a quality control strategy to identify unit dose distribution system errors at initial, intermediate and final stages of the process, improving the involvement of the pharmacy department and ward nurses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"35 4","pages":"Pages 180-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.005","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To assess the efficacy of a new quality control strategy based on daily randomised sampling and monitoring of a sentinel surveillance system (SSS) medication cart, in order to identify medication errors and their origin at different levels of the process.

Method

Prospective quality control study with one-year follow-up. An SSS medication cart was randomly selected once a week and double-checked before dispensing medication. Medication errors were recorded before the cart was taken to the relevant hospital ward. Information concerning complaints after receiving medication and 24-h monitoring was also noted. Type and origin of error data were assessed by a unit dose quality control group, which proposed relevant improvement measures.

Results

Thirty-four SSS carts were assessed, including 5130 medication lines and 9952 dispensed doses, corresponding to 753 patients. Ninety erroneous lines (1.8%) and 142 mistaken doses (1.4%) were identified at the pharmacy department. The most frequent error was dose duplication (38%) and its main cause was inappropriate management and forgetfulness (69%). Fifty medication complaints (6.6% of patients) were mainly due to new treatment at admission (52%), and 41 (0.8% of all medication lines), did not completely match the prescription (0.6% lines) as recorded by the pharmacy department. Thirty-seven (4.9% of patients) medication complaints due to changes at admission and 32 matching errors (0.6% medication lines) were recorded. The main cause also was inappropriate management and forgetfulness (24%). The simultaneous recording of incidences due to complaints and new medication coincided in 33.3%. In addition, 433 (4.3%) of dispensed doses were returned to the pharmacy department. After the unit dose quality control group conducted their feedback analysis, 64 improvement measures for pharmacy department nurses, 37 for pharmacists, and 24 for the hospital ward were introduced.

Conclusions

The SSS programme has proven to be useful as a quality control strategy to identify unit dose distribution system errors at initial, intermediate and final stages of the process, improving the involvement of the pharmacy department and ward nurses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用哨点监测系统方法监测个性化配药中的用药错误
目的评价基于哨点监测系统(SSS)药物车每日随机抽样监测的质量控制新策略的效果,以识别不同层次用药过程中的用药差错及其原因。方法前瞻性质量控制研究,随访1年。每周随机抽取1辆SSS药车,在配药前进行复核。在推车被送往相关医院病房之前,记录了用药错误。还注意到在接受药物治疗和24小时监测后的投诉情况。采用单位剂量质量对照组对误差数据的类型和来源进行评估,并提出相应的改进措施。结果共评估SSS车34辆,包括5130个用药线,9952个配药剂量,对应753例患者。在药房发现了90个错误品系(1.8%)和142个错误剂量(1.4%)。最常见的错误是剂量重复(38%),其主要原因是管理不当和遗忘(69%)。用药投诉以入院新治疗为主的有50例(占患者的6.6%),占52%;与药房记录的处方不完全匹配的有41例(占全部用药线的0.8%),占全部用药线的0.6%。记录了37例(4.9%)因入院时药物变更引起的用药投诉和32例(0.6%)药物匹配错误。主要原因还有管理不当和健忘(24%)。同时记录主诉与新用药发生率的占33.3%。另外,有433剂(4.3%)的配药被退回药房。单位剂量质量控制组对单位剂量质量控制组进行反馈分析后,介绍了64项改进措施:药科护士、药师37项、医院病房24项。结论SSS方案已被证明是一种有效的质量控制策略,可识别单位剂量分配系统在初始、中期和最后阶段的错误,提高药剂科和病房护士的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity Profile and Adherence to the Pharmacotherapeutic Regimen of Gemcitabine–carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System Effectiveness and Use of Linezolid in Hospitalisation Wards Application of the Technology Web 2.0 in a Drug Information Centre Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1