Assessing a Therapeutic Exchange Protocol for Second-generation Antidepressants: Clinical Results

F. Martínez-Granados, E. Climent-Grana, E. Pérez-Martínez, J.P. Ordovás-Baines, J. Selva Otaolaurruchi, M.A. Bernabéu Martínez
{"title":"Assessing a Therapeutic Exchange Protocol for Second-generation Antidepressants: Clinical Results","authors":"F. Martínez-Granados,&nbsp;E. Climent-Grana,&nbsp;E. Pérez-Martínez,&nbsp;J.P. Ordovás-Baines,&nbsp;J. Selva Otaolaurruchi,&nbsp;M.A. Bernabéu Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To design a therapeutic exchange protocol for antidepressants and clinically assess variables, such as compliance level, frequency of cases with clinically significant increase on the Udvalg-für-Kliniske-Undersogelser (UKU) psychopharmacological scale, adverse effects analysis, overall analysis of UKU rating development and patients’ level of acceptance. Secondary objectives were to correlate psychopharmacological treatment aspects with the pharmacological morbidity level, and evaluate the clinical impact of pharmacotherapeutic optimisation measures.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The protocol is designed in accordance with a bibliographical review, which was approved by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Commission. Sequential study was carried out with a sample of 30 patients. Three measurements were taken (base line, at 48–72<!--> <!-->h and at 1–3<!--> <!-->weeks) to calculate the pharmacotherapeutic morbidity with the UKU rating scale and the Global Clinical Impression. Pharmacotherapeutic optimisation measures were used for those patients with high pharmacotherapeutic morbidity levels.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The compliance level was 73.3%. One patient experienced ≥25% increase on the UKU rating scale and another patient suffered from an adverse effect. The final UKU rating reached statistical significance compared with the measurements taken at 48–72<!--> <!-->h (<em>P</em>=.032) and with the base line measurement (<em>P</em>=.007). Patient acceptance was 90%. The impact of optimisation measurements on the pharmacotherapeutic morbidity level was clinically and statistically significant (<em>P</em>&lt;.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The proposed protocol has been widely accepted and it is quite certain that it is to be introduced in at a general hospital level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"35 5","pages":"Pages 244-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.farmae.2010.06.007","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511000372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To design a therapeutic exchange protocol for antidepressants and clinically assess variables, such as compliance level, frequency of cases with clinically significant increase on the Udvalg-für-Kliniske-Undersogelser (UKU) psychopharmacological scale, adverse effects analysis, overall analysis of UKU rating development and patients’ level of acceptance. Secondary objectives were to correlate psychopharmacological treatment aspects with the pharmacological morbidity level, and evaluate the clinical impact of pharmacotherapeutic optimisation measures.

Method

The protocol is designed in accordance with a bibliographical review, which was approved by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Commission. Sequential study was carried out with a sample of 30 patients. Three measurements were taken (base line, at 48–72 h and at 1–3 weeks) to calculate the pharmacotherapeutic morbidity with the UKU rating scale and the Global Clinical Impression. Pharmacotherapeutic optimisation measures were used for those patients with high pharmacotherapeutic morbidity levels.

Results

The compliance level was 73.3%. One patient experienced ≥25% increase on the UKU rating scale and another patient suffered from an adverse effect. The final UKU rating reached statistical significance compared with the measurements taken at 48–72 h (P=.032) and with the base line measurement (P=.007). Patient acceptance was 90%. The impact of optimisation measurements on the pharmacotherapeutic morbidity level was clinically and statistically significant (P<.001).

Conclusions

The proposed protocol has been widely accepted and it is quite certain that it is to be introduced in at a general hospital level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估第二代抗抑郁药的治疗交换方案:临床结果
目的设计抗抑郁药物治疗交换方案,并对药物依从性、UKU (udvalg - f - kliniske - undersogelser)心理药理学量表临床显著升高病例频次、不良反应分析、UKU评分发展总体分析及患者接受程度等变量进行临床评估。次要目的是将精神药理学治疗方面与药理学发病率水平相关联,并评估药物治疗优化措施的临床影响。方法本方案根据文献综述设计,经药学和治疗学委员会批准。对30例患者进行序贯研究。采用三种测量方法(基线,48-72小时和1-3周),用UKU评定量表和全球临床印象来计算药物治疗发病率。对药物治疗发病率高的患者采用药物治疗优化措施。结果合规性为73.3%。1例患者UKU评分增加≥25%,另1例患者出现不良反应。与48-72小时测量值(P= 0.032)和基线测量值(P= 0.07)相比,最终UKU评分达到统计学意义。患者接受度为90%。优化测量对药物治疗发病率水平的影响具有临床和统计学意义(P<.001)。结论该方案已被广泛接受,在综合医院推广应用的可能性较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity Profile and Adherence to the Pharmacotherapeutic Regimen of Gemcitabine–carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System Effectiveness and Use of Linezolid in Hospitalisation Wards Application of the Technology Web 2.0 in a Drug Information Centre Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1