{"title":"Accounting faculty’s pursuit of professional certifications: Pre- and post-terminal degree comparison","authors":"Jason Bergner, Yining Chen, Melloney Simerly","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using survey data collected from 536 U.S. accounting faculty, this study applies theories of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to investigate the differences of two terminally degreed faculty groups <em>(PreCerts v. PostCerts)</em> in their motivations, perceived obstacles, and perceived benefits of pursuing a professional accounting certification. Among our findings, we find that faculty receiving a certification before their terminal degree (<em>PreCert</em>s) chose extrinsic factors more often than their <em>PostCert</em> counterparts. For example, <em>PreCerts chose</em> a job requirement as a motivation for obtaining a professional certification significantly more often. On the other hand, faculty who obtained their professional certification after their terminal degree <em>(PostCerts)</em> tended to choose more intrinsic-motivating items. With a trend of increasing non-certified Ph.D. faculty, we believe these results not only shed light on differing motivations for the two groups but can also serve current accounting departments in encouraging non-certified faculty to pursue a professional certification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074857512200032X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Using survey data collected from 536 U.S. accounting faculty, this study applies theories of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to investigate the differences of two terminally degreed faculty groups (PreCerts v. PostCerts) in their motivations, perceived obstacles, and perceived benefits of pursuing a professional accounting certification. Among our findings, we find that faculty receiving a certification before their terminal degree (PreCerts) chose extrinsic factors more often than their PostCert counterparts. For example, PreCerts chose a job requirement as a motivation for obtaining a professional certification significantly more often. On the other hand, faculty who obtained their professional certification after their terminal degree (PostCerts) tended to choose more intrinsic-motivating items. With a trend of increasing non-certified Ph.D. faculty, we believe these results not only shed light on differing motivations for the two groups but can also serve current accounting departments in encouraging non-certified faculty to pursue a professional certification.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.