Method of civil procedure

Oksana Kiriiak
{"title":"Method of civil procedure","authors":"Oksana Kiriiak","doi":"10.1016/j.icj.2015.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Investigating the civil procedure regulation as a set of interrelated tools and techniques (imperative, dispositive and determinative) providing legal impact on the behaviour of civil procedure participants, this article is to substantiate that the method of civil procedure is a set of techniques (imperative, dispositive and determinative), methods (permissions, regulations, prohibitions, sanctions) and means (the consequences of failure to comply with civil procedural rules) of regulation implemented in the administration of justice in civil cases. However, determinative method of civil procedure regulations is a kind of methodological system of weights and balances, where the dispositive will of the parties and the imperative discretion of the court dialectically transform themselves in a new quality representing a symbiosis of the ways and techniques of civil procedure regulations. Moreover, summarizing the comparative aspect of the conducted research, it is proved that there are more than enough reasonable grounds to state that despite some discrepancy in the scientific approaches of theoretical legal proceedings, the litigation in practice requires the usage of simultaneous methodological techniques for procedural regulation in different countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32140,"journal":{"name":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 143-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.icj.2015.12.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351667415000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigating the civil procedure regulation as a set of interrelated tools and techniques (imperative, dispositive and determinative) providing legal impact on the behaviour of civil procedure participants, this article is to substantiate that the method of civil procedure is a set of techniques (imperative, dispositive and determinative), methods (permissions, regulations, prohibitions, sanctions) and means (the consequences of failure to comply with civil procedural rules) of regulation implemented in the administration of justice in civil cases. However, determinative method of civil procedure regulations is a kind of methodological system of weights and balances, where the dispositive will of the parties and the imperative discretion of the court dialectically transform themselves in a new quality representing a symbiosis of the ways and techniques of civil procedure regulations. Moreover, summarizing the comparative aspect of the conducted research, it is proved that there are more than enough reasonable grounds to state that despite some discrepancy in the scientific approaches of theoretical legal proceedings, the litigation in practice requires the usage of simultaneous methodological techniques for procedural regulation in different countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民事诉讼方式
本文将民事诉讼规则作为一套相互关联的工具和技术(命令性、决定性和决定性)对民事诉讼参与人的行为产生法律影响进行考察,旨在证明民事诉讼方法是一套技术(命令性、决定性和决定性)、方法(许可、规定、禁止、限制、限制和限制)。制裁)和手段(不遵守民事程序规则的后果)在民事司法案件中实施的规则。然而,民事诉讼规则的决定论方法是一种权衡的方法论体系,当事人的决定意志与法院的强制裁量权在其中辩证地转化为一种新的性质,体现了民事诉讼规则方式与技术的共生关系。此外,总结所进行的研究的比较方面,证明有足够的理由表明,尽管理论法律诉讼的科学方法存在一些差异,但在实践中,诉讼需要在不同国家的程序规制中使用同步的方法技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DOMESTIC REFORMS TOWARDS STRENGTHENING THE RULE OF LAW, IN GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, AND UKRAINE THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE: WESTERN AND ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVES SHOULD THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE DEVELOP A POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE CONDITIONS FOR THE BANKRUPTCY OF NATURAL PERSONS: WHICH BALTIC STATE IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE FOR BANKRUPTCY? WHAT CAN FRANCE LEARN FROM THE CZECH REPUBLIC’S APPROACH TO THE ISSUE OF WEARING (ISLAMIC) RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1