Case study of development, validation, and acceptance of a non-animal method for assessing veterinary vaccine potency

Ivo Claassen
{"title":"Case study of development, validation, and acceptance of a non-animal method for assessing veterinary vaccine potency","authors":"Ivo Claassen","doi":"10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper describes the development of an <em>in vitro</em> assay to replace <em>in vivo</em> potency testing for the batch release of inactivated Newcastle Disease virus vaccines. The assay involves the extraction of inactivated antigen from oil emulsion vaccines, the most common adjuvant for poultry vaccines. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is used to quantify the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein of the virus, which was demonstrated to correlate with protection levels.</p><p>Validation experiments showed that the method could be used for HN antigen regardless of virus strain or method of inactivation. From the results of these tests it was concluded that this method could replace the <em>in vivo</em> methods that were prescribed in European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Monograph 0870 on inactivated Newcastle Disease vaccines. Large quantities of the necessary reagents and reference materials were prepared and tested. The materials were subjected to stability studies to demonstrate their suitability for long-term storage in order to guarantee long-term availability to the international community. A study in three laboratories demonstrated a good correlation of the candidate assay with two existing <em>in vivo</em> assays, good transferability of the assay, and excellent reproducibility of the proposed assay. A collaborative study was organized by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines &amp; Healthcare (EDQM) to demonstrate the repeatability and the reproducibility of the candidate <em>in vitro</em> assay. The suitability of the reference reagent as a Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation was also determined. Fourteen laboratories participated in this study. As a result of these efforts, the assay was included in the relevant Ph. Eur. monograph (01/2007:0870). This paper will address not only the technical aspect of this process but also factors that are considered critical for the success of this project.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89221,"journal":{"name":"Procedia in vaccinology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 175-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.017","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia in vaccinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877282X1100035X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This paper describes the development of an in vitro assay to replace in vivo potency testing for the batch release of inactivated Newcastle Disease virus vaccines. The assay involves the extraction of inactivated antigen from oil emulsion vaccines, the most common adjuvant for poultry vaccines. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is used to quantify the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein of the virus, which was demonstrated to correlate with protection levels.

Validation experiments showed that the method could be used for HN antigen regardless of virus strain or method of inactivation. From the results of these tests it was concluded that this method could replace the in vivo methods that were prescribed in European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Monograph 0870 on inactivated Newcastle Disease vaccines. Large quantities of the necessary reagents and reference materials were prepared and tested. The materials were subjected to stability studies to demonstrate their suitability for long-term storage in order to guarantee long-term availability to the international community. A study in three laboratories demonstrated a good correlation of the candidate assay with two existing in vivo assays, good transferability of the assay, and excellent reproducibility of the proposed assay. A collaborative study was organized by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & Healthcare (EDQM) to demonstrate the repeatability and the reproducibility of the candidate in vitro assay. The suitability of the reference reagent as a Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation was also determined. Fourteen laboratories participated in this study. As a result of these efforts, the assay was included in the relevant Ph. Eur. monograph (01/2007:0870). This paper will address not only the technical aspect of this process but also factors that are considered critical for the success of this project.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发、验证和接受评估兽医疫苗效力的非动物方法的案例研究
本文描述了一种体外试验的发展,以取代体内效价试验,用于批量释放灭活的新城疫病毒疫苗。该试验包括从油乳剂疫苗(禽类疫苗最常见的佐剂)中提取灭活抗原。酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)用于定量病毒的血凝素-神经氨酸酶(HN)蛋白,该蛋白已被证明与保护水平相关。验证实验表明,无论病毒株或灭活方法如何,该方法均可用于HN抗原。从这些试验的结果得出结论,该方法可以取代欧洲药典(Ph. Eur.)规定的体内方法。关于新城疫灭活疫苗的专著0870。制备并测试了大量必要的试剂和标准物质。对这些材料进行了稳定性研究,以证明它们适合长期储存,以保证长期提供给国际社会。在三个实验室进行的一项研究表明,候选测定法与两种现有的体内测定法具有良好的相关性,该测定法具有良好的可转移性,并且所提议的测定法具有良好的可重复性。欧洲药品质量管理局组织了一项合作研究;医疗保健(EDQM),以证明候选体外测定的可重复性和再现性。标准试剂作为Ph. Eur的适用性。确定生物参比制剂。14个实验室参与了这项研究。由于这些努力,该方法被纳入了相关的博士论文。专著(01/2007:0870)。本文不仅将讨论这个过程的技术方面,还将讨论被认为对这个项目的成功至关重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Production and Characterization of Human Monoclonal Antibodies from the Cells of A(H1N1)pdm2009 Influenza Virus Infected Indian Donors Editorial: Preventive Vaccination Stabilization of Outer Domain of gp120 from HIV-1 Subtype C for Vaccine Immunogen Design Haloarchaeal Gas Vesicle Nanoparticles Displaying Salmonella Antigens as a Novel Approach to Vaccine Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1