Juan Ybarra , Joan Sanchez-Hernandez , Jose Maria Pou , Sandra Fernández , Ignasi Gich , Jordi Ordóñez-Llanos , Jeroni Jurado , Alberto de Leiva , Antonio Pérez
{"title":"Anthropometrical measures are easily obtainable sensitive and specific predictors of insulin resistance in healthy individuals","authors":"Juan Ybarra , Joan Sanchez-Hernandez , Jose Maria Pou , Sandra Fernández , Ignasi Gich , Jordi Ordóñez-Llanos , Jeroni Jurado , Alberto de Leiva , Antonio Pérez","doi":"10.1016/j.precon.2005.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To investigate whether user-friendly anthropometrical variables, i.e., waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) can properly identify insulin resistance (IR) in healthy subjects.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was carried out with 164 disease-free subjects (78 males and 86 females aged 22–50 years) recruited from hospital staff in Barcelona (Spain) over a period of one year. BMI, WC, blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, glucose and insulin were measured by standard methods. IR was defined as homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-IR equal to or greater than 3,8.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence of IR was 29.9% (males 39.5%, females 21.8%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.017). Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis identified WC (<em>r</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.496; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0005) as the only independent predictor of IR in the whole group. WC (<em>r</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.499; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0005) was the only variable that predicted IR in men and BMI (<em>r</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.506; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0005) in women. WC above 88 cm for women and 102 cm for men predicted IR with a sensitivity of 90.9% and 100%, and a specificity of 71.7% and 51.6%, respectively. However, receiving operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis showed optimal WC values of 106.5 and 97.5 cm for men and women, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>WC is a simple, non-invasive and efficient tool for the screening of IR in the general population. Finally, taking into account that cut-off points of WC are population-specific, it will be of considerable interest to establish the relationship of WC with metabolic complications in all ethnic groups in order to generate useful critical values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88300,"journal":{"name":"Prevention and control : the official journal of the World Heart Federation","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 175-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.precon.2005.05.001","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention and control : the official journal of the World Heart Federation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573208805000346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
Background
To investigate whether user-friendly anthropometrical variables, i.e., waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) can properly identify insulin resistance (IR) in healthy subjects.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was carried out with 164 disease-free subjects (78 males and 86 females aged 22–50 years) recruited from hospital staff in Barcelona (Spain) over a period of one year. BMI, WC, blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, glucose and insulin were measured by standard methods. IR was defined as homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-IR equal to or greater than 3,8.
Results
The prevalence of IR was 29.9% (males 39.5%, females 21.8%; P = 0.017). Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis identified WC (r2 = 0.496; P < 0.0005) as the only independent predictor of IR in the whole group. WC (r2 = 0.499; P < 0.0005) was the only variable that predicted IR in men and BMI (r2 = 0.506; P < 0.0005) in women. WC above 88 cm for women and 102 cm for men predicted IR with a sensitivity of 90.9% and 100%, and a specificity of 71.7% and 51.6%, respectively. However, receiving operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis showed optimal WC values of 106.5 and 97.5 cm for men and women, respectively.
Conclusions
WC is a simple, non-invasive and efficient tool for the screening of IR in the general population. Finally, taking into account that cut-off points of WC are population-specific, it will be of considerable interest to establish the relationship of WC with metabolic complications in all ethnic groups in order to generate useful critical values.