Are evidence-based cardiovascular prevention therapies being used? A review of aspirin and statin therapies

Jun Ma, Veronica Monti, Randall S. Stafford
{"title":"Are evidence-based cardiovascular prevention therapies being used? A review of aspirin and statin therapies","authors":"Jun Ma,&nbsp;Veronica Monti,&nbsp;Randall S. Stafford","doi":"10.1016/j.precon.2006.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and other developed countries. While therapeutic lifestyle changes are integral to general risk reduction, drug therapy proves necessary for patients whose cardiovascular risk is above critical thresholds. Among proven medical treatments, antiplatelet therapy (mainly aspirin) and cholesterol-lowering therapy (mainly statins) are unequivocally recommended for the reduction of cardiovascular risk. Therapeutic indications for both therapies share great similarities, while critical differences are identifiable. Despite the compelling evidence, the gap between recommended practice and actualized practice is large. Between the two therapies, aspirin tends to be more underused than statins despite its more favorable cost-effectiveness. Admittedly, barriers to optimal translation and implementation of science to practice are considerable, but they are not insurmountable and effective interventions are available to overcome a variety of commonly cited barriers. This article reviews current practice guidelines regarding antiplatelet therapy and cholesterol-lowering treatment for cardiovascular prevention, available data of treatment gaps, documented barriers to guideline adherence, and promising interventions for practice improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88300,"journal":{"name":"Prevention and control : the official journal of the World Heart Federation","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 285-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.precon.2006.05.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention and control : the official journal of the World Heart Federation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573208806000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and other developed countries. While therapeutic lifestyle changes are integral to general risk reduction, drug therapy proves necessary for patients whose cardiovascular risk is above critical thresholds. Among proven medical treatments, antiplatelet therapy (mainly aspirin) and cholesterol-lowering therapy (mainly statins) are unequivocally recommended for the reduction of cardiovascular risk. Therapeutic indications for both therapies share great similarities, while critical differences are identifiable. Despite the compelling evidence, the gap between recommended practice and actualized practice is large. Between the two therapies, aspirin tends to be more underused than statins despite its more favorable cost-effectiveness. Admittedly, barriers to optimal translation and implementation of science to practice are considerable, but they are not insurmountable and effective interventions are available to overcome a variety of commonly cited barriers. This article reviews current practice guidelines regarding antiplatelet therapy and cholesterol-lowering treatment for cardiovascular prevention, available data of treatment gaps, documented barriers to guideline adherence, and promising interventions for practice improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是否正在使用循证心血管预防疗法?阿司匹林和他汀类药物治疗综述
心血管疾病(CVD)是美国和其他发达国家发病率和死亡率的主要原因。虽然治疗性生活方式的改变是降低总体风险不可或缺的一部分,但对于心血管风险高于临界阈值的患者,药物治疗被证明是必要的。在已证实的医学治疗中,抗血小板治疗(主要是阿司匹林)和降胆固醇治疗(主要是他汀类药物)被明确推荐用于降低心血管风险。两种疗法的治疗适应症有很大的相似之处,而关键的差异是可识别的。尽管有令人信服的证据,推荐的做法和实际做法之间的差距是很大的。在这两种治疗方法中,阿司匹林比他汀类药物使用率低,尽管它的成本效益更高。不可否认,将科学转化为实践的障碍是相当大的,但它们并不是不可克服的,有效的干预措施可以克服各种常见的障碍。本文回顾了目前关于心血管预防的抗血小板治疗和降胆固醇治疗的实践指南,现有的治疗差距数据,指南依从性的记录障碍,以及实践改进的有希望的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TWO. BRECHT’S RABBIT ACKNOWLEDGMENTS FIVE. PARLOR GAMES THREE. “THE PROPER STUDY OF INTERACTION” FOUR. CHAIN LETTERS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1