Financial development and poverty reduction in developing countries: New evidence from banks and microfinance institutions

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Review of Development Finance Pub Date : 2016-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rdf.2016.06.002
Ficawoyi Donou-Adonsou , Kevin Sylwester
{"title":"Financial development and poverty reduction in developing countries: New evidence from banks and microfinance institutions","authors":"Ficawoyi Donou-Adonsou ,&nbsp;Kevin Sylwester","doi":"10.1016/j.rdf.2016.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The literature on financial development and growth has received a lot of attention over the past two decades. Unlike growth, not much of consideration has been given to poverty reduction. Moreover, most of the past studies focus on bank and stock market development. The advent of microfinance institutions (MFIs) lets to think about the potential role MFIs can play in a countrywide economy. In this study, we consider to what extent banks and MFIs reduce poverty. We apply the instrumental variables approach, namely the fixed-effects two-stage least squares, to a panel of 71 developing countries over the period 2002–2011. Using credit to GDP as the main financial development indicator, the results indicate that banks reduce poverty when poverty is measured by the headcount ratio and poverty gap. As for the squared poverty gap, there is no significant effect of banks. On the other hand, MFIs do not appear to have any impact on poverty regardless of the measure of poverty employed. These results imply that while banks have some ability to reduce poverty, MFIs do not, at least at the aggregate level. Our results are robust to the use of assets to GDP as an alternative measure of financial development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39052,"journal":{"name":"Review of Development Finance","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 82-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rdf.2016.06.002","citationCount":"148","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Development Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879933715300920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 148

Abstract

The literature on financial development and growth has received a lot of attention over the past two decades. Unlike growth, not much of consideration has been given to poverty reduction. Moreover, most of the past studies focus on bank and stock market development. The advent of microfinance institutions (MFIs) lets to think about the potential role MFIs can play in a countrywide economy. In this study, we consider to what extent banks and MFIs reduce poverty. We apply the instrumental variables approach, namely the fixed-effects two-stage least squares, to a panel of 71 developing countries over the period 2002–2011. Using credit to GDP as the main financial development indicator, the results indicate that banks reduce poverty when poverty is measured by the headcount ratio and poverty gap. As for the squared poverty gap, there is no significant effect of banks. On the other hand, MFIs do not appear to have any impact on poverty regardless of the measure of poverty employed. These results imply that while banks have some ability to reduce poverty, MFIs do not, at least at the aggregate level. Our results are robust to the use of assets to GDP as an alternative measure of financial development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展中国家的金融发展和减贫:来自银行和小额信贷机构的新证据
在过去的二十年里,关于金融发展和增长的文献受到了很多关注。与增长不同的是,减贫问题没有得到太多考虑。此外,过去的研究大多集中在银行和股票市场的发展上。小额信贷机构(MFIs)的出现让我们思考小额信贷机构在全国经济中可以发挥的潜在作用。在本研究中,我们考虑银行和小额信贷机构在多大程度上减少了贫困。我们将工具变量方法,即固定效应两阶段最小二乘法,应用于2002-2011年期间71个发展中国家的面板。以信贷与GDP之比作为主要的金融发展指标,结果表明,当以人口比率和贫困差距衡量贫困时,银行减少了贫困。对于贫富差距的平方化,银行的影响不显著。另一方面,无论采用何种贫穷标准,小额信贷机构似乎对贫穷没有任何影响。这些结果表明,虽然银行有一些减少贫困的能力,但小额信贷机构没有,至少在总体水平上没有。我们的结果是稳健的使用资产GDP作为金融发展的替代措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Development Finance
Review of Development Finance Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of the non-life insurance market in Brazil Institutions, inward foreign direct investment, trade openness and credit level in emerging market economies Determinants of credit risk in the banking system in Sub-Saharan Africa Cash holdings and corporate governance: The effects of premium listing in Brazil Bank competition and regional integration: Evidence from ASEAN nations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1