Initial assessment of “Gissell's stain”: A novel histopathological method for the identification of Helicobacter pylori

Gian Carlos Ramirez Ubillus , Mercedes Bravo Taxa , Renier Cruz Baca , Ricardo Neira Montoya , Eduardo Sedano Gelvet
{"title":"Initial assessment of “Gissell's stain”: A novel histopathological method for the identification of Helicobacter pylori","authors":"Gian Carlos Ramirez Ubillus ,&nbsp;Mercedes Bravo Taxa ,&nbsp;Renier Cruz Baca ,&nbsp;Ricardo Neira Montoya ,&nbsp;Eduardo Sedano Gelvet","doi":"10.1016/j.patol.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><p>The histopathological identification of <span><em>Helicobacter pylori</em></span> using the routine method (haematoxylin–eosin) is not only very difficult but also has low sensitivity. Giemsa staining is often used in addition, but different protocols do not produce homogeneous results. Furthermore, the Gold Standard recommended by the European Helicobacter Pylori Study Group has been applied in very few studies, thus resulting in uncertain outcomes. Therefore, a new staining method is required to overcome these limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic capacity and inter-observer agreement of “Gissell's stain”.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study evaluated 99 gastric paraffin blocks from a private laboratory. Three sections were prepared from each block, and haematoxylin–eosin (HE), Giemsa and “Gissell's stain” methods were applied. The kappa statistics, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>“Gissell's stain” obtained the highest inter-observer agreement (kappa<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.87) compared to the other two methods (HE, kappa<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.51; Giemsa, kappa<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.83). It also obtained the best sensitivity and negative predictive value (97.1% and 98.3%, respectively) compared with the other two methods (HE: 68.6% and 85.1%, respectively; Giemsa: 88.6% and 93.9%, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Given its unique characteristics (fast, cheap, accessible, and easy to use), in addition to its statistical reliability, “Gissell's stain” has great potential for routine use in the identification of <em>H. pylori</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39194,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Patologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Patologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699885523000442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives

The histopathological identification of Helicobacter pylori using the routine method (haematoxylin–eosin) is not only very difficult but also has low sensitivity. Giemsa staining is often used in addition, but different protocols do not produce homogeneous results. Furthermore, the Gold Standard recommended by the European Helicobacter Pylori Study Group has been applied in very few studies, thus resulting in uncertain outcomes. Therefore, a new staining method is required to overcome these limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic capacity and inter-observer agreement of “Gissell's stain”.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study evaluated 99 gastric paraffin blocks from a private laboratory. Three sections were prepared from each block, and haematoxylin–eosin (HE), Giemsa and “Gissell's stain” methods were applied. The kappa statistics, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated.

Results

“Gissell's stain” obtained the highest inter-observer agreement (kappa = 0.87) compared to the other two methods (HE, kappa = 0.51; Giemsa, kappa = 0.83). It also obtained the best sensitivity and negative predictive value (97.1% and 98.3%, respectively) compared with the other two methods (HE: 68.6% and 85.1%, respectively; Giemsa: 88.6% and 93.9%, respectively).

Conclusions

Given its unique characteristics (fast, cheap, accessible, and easy to use), in addition to its statistical reliability, “Gissell's stain” has great potential for routine use in the identification of H. pylori.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gissell染色的初步评估:一种新的幽门螺杆菌组织病理学鉴定方法
引言和目的使用常规方法(苏木精-伊红)对幽门螺杆菌进行组织病理学鉴定不仅非常困难,而且灵敏度低。Giemsa染色通常也被使用,但不同的方案不能产生均匀的结果。此外,欧洲幽门螺杆菌研究小组推荐的金标准在极少数研究中应用,因此导致了不确定的结果。因此,需要一种新的染色方法来克服这些限制。本研究的目的是评估Gissell染色的诊断能力和观察者之间的一致性。材料和方法一项横断面研究评估了来自私人实验室的99个胃石蜡块。从每个块制备三个切片,并应用苏木精-伊红(HE)、吉姆萨和“吉塞尔染色”方法。计算kappa统计、敏感性、特异性和预测值。结果Gissell染色与其他两种方法(HE,kappa=0.51;Giemsa,kappa0.83)相比,获得了最高的观察者间一致性(kappa=0.87),与其他两个方法(HE:分别为68.6%和85.1%;Giemsa:分别为88.6%和93.9%)相比,也获得了最佳的敏感性和阴性预测值(分别为97.1%和98.3%)“Gissell染色剂”具有独特的特点(快速、廉价、易用和易于使用),除了其统计可靠性外,在幽门螺杆菌的常规鉴定中具有很大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola de Patologia
Revista Espanola de Patologia Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
34 days
期刊最新文献
Comparison of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) expression in disordered proliferative endometrium and simple endometrial hyperplasia In memoriam. Andrés Ribas Barceló (1941-2024) Unicentric Castleman disease masquerading as a gluteal mass: A diagnostic challenge Recurrencia de glomerulonefritis postrasplante renal: características clínico-patológicas Recomendaciones de la SEAP-IAP para la recolección, el almacenamiento y el uso de materiales biológicos de origen humano y los datos relacionados, destinados a la investigación. Consideración genérica de biobanco y revisión ético-legal (Parte II)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1