Frequency of prescriptions of off-label drugs and drugs not approved for pediatric use in primary health care in a southern municipality of Brazil

Marcele Giacomin Gonçalves, Isabela Heineck
{"title":"Frequency of prescriptions of off-label drugs and drugs not approved for pediatric use in primary health care in a southern municipality of Brazil","authors":"Marcele Giacomin Gonçalves,&nbsp;Isabela Heineck","doi":"10.1016/j.rppede.2015.06.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the frequency of prescriptions of off-label drugs and drugs not approved for pediatric use in primary health care in medium-sized municipality of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection, which analyzed prescriptions issued to 326 patients from August to December/2012 in two basic health units in the city of Viamão, state of Rio Grande do Sul. It included all prescriptions of patients whose medical records or service records were available and complete in relation to the date of presence, weight and date of birth. Off-label prescriptions were those which, in relation to the drug leaflet, showed dose different the recommended range, frequency of prescription and/or different form of administration and younger age than the indicated range. Descriptive statistics with absolute frequencies, means and standard deviations were used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, a total of 731 drug prescriptions were issued and the frequency of off-label medications prescribed was 31.7%, especially antihistamines and antiasthmatics (32.3% and 31.5%, respectively). The main type of off-label prescription was dose (38.8%), followed by age range (31.5%) and frequency of administration (29.3%). Regarding the dose off-label prescription, overdose was more frequent (93.3%) than the underdose (6.7%). Prescriptions of unapproved drugs were not identified.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study showed that off label prescription is common in both assessed units. The observed percentage of off label prescription was higher than that reported by European studies carried out in primary care. On the other hand, the prescription of drugs not approved for children was not observed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101120,"journal":{"name":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppede.2015.06.023","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2359348215000858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Objective

To determine the frequency of prescriptions of off-label drugs and drugs not approved for pediatric use in primary health care in medium-sized municipality of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Methods

Cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection, which analyzed prescriptions issued to 326 patients from August to December/2012 in two basic health units in the city of Viamão, state of Rio Grande do Sul. It included all prescriptions of patients whose medical records or service records were available and complete in relation to the date of presence, weight and date of birth. Off-label prescriptions were those which, in relation to the drug leaflet, showed dose different the recommended range, frequency of prescription and/or different form of administration and younger age than the indicated range. Descriptive statistics with absolute frequencies, means and standard deviations were used.

Results

During the study period, a total of 731 drug prescriptions were issued and the frequency of off-label medications prescribed was 31.7%, especially antihistamines and antiasthmatics (32.3% and 31.5%, respectively). The main type of off-label prescription was dose (38.8%), followed by age range (31.5%) and frequency of administration (29.3%). Regarding the dose off-label prescription, overdose was more frequent (93.3%) than the underdose (6.7%). Prescriptions of unapproved drugs were not identified.

Conclusions

The study showed that off label prescription is common in both assessed units. The observed percentage of off label prescription was higher than that reported by European studies carried out in primary care. On the other hand, the prescription of drugs not approved for children was not observed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在巴西南部一个城市的初级卫生保健中,未经批准的儿科使用说明书外药物和药物的处方频率
目的了解巴西南里奥格兰德州中等城市儿童初级卫生保健中超说明书用药和未获批准用药的处方频率。方法采用横断面研究方法,回顾性收集资料,分析2012年8月至12月在南里奥格兰德州维阿姆市的两个基本卫生单位向326名患者开出的处方。它包括有完整的医疗记录或服务记录的病人的所有处方,包括出生日期、体重和出生日期。超说明书处方是指那些与药品说明书相关的处方,显示剂量不同于推荐范围,处方频率和/或不同给药形式,年龄低于建议范围的处方。使用绝对频率、平均值和标准差的描述性统计。结果研究期间,共开具药物处方731张,超说明书用药频次为31.7%,其中抗组胺药和平喘药的超说明书用药频次分别为32.3%和31.5%。超说明书处方类型以剂量为主(38.8%),其次为年龄范围(31.5%)和给药频次(29.3%)。超说明书处方中,用药过量(93.3%)高于用药不足(6.7%)。未发现未经批准的药物处方。结论本研究表明,超说明书处方在两个评估单位都很常见。观察到的标签外处方百分比高于欧洲在初级保健中进行的研究报告。另一方面,未观察到未批准用于儿童的药物处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of interaction with clowns on vital signs and non-verbal communication of hospitalized children Association of growth and nutritional parameters with pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis: a literature review Diagnosis of infant synostotic and nonsynostotic cranial deformities: a review for pediatricians Magistral drugs in hospitalized newborns and children Association between cardiorespiratory fitness and body fat in girls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1