Toward a framework for bridging the gap between science and practice in prevention: A focus on evaluator and practitioner perspectives

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation and Program Planning Pub Date : 1997-08-01 DOI:10.1016/S0149-7189(97)00016-5
Erin Morrissey , Abraham Wandersman , Diana Seybolt , Maury Nation , Cindy Crusto , Katie Davino
{"title":"Toward a framework for bridging the gap between science and practice in prevention: A focus on evaluator and practitioner perspectives","authors":"Erin Morrissey ,&nbsp;Abraham Wandersman ,&nbsp;Diana Seybolt ,&nbsp;Maury Nation ,&nbsp;Cindy Crusto ,&nbsp;Katie Davino","doi":"10.1016/S0149-7189(97)00016-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the past decade, government agencies and foundations have funded numerous community-driven initiatives in the area of prevention that have demonstrated mixed results in terms of outcomes and impacts. This article addresses several challenges faced by community-driven initiatives that may limit the attainment of significant program outcomes. A preliminary framework is presented that identifies the current state of prevention practice, the contributions of prevention science, and the barriers that limit the reciprocal transfer of knowledge between practice and science. Evaluation strategies are also presented which address these barriers, potentially bridging the gap between prevention science and prevention practice. The perspectives of those in the field are included through the presentation of the results of a survey of 101 Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) project directors, evaluators, and consultants. Although the focus is on evaluator and practitioner perspectives, the purpose of the paper is to stimulate discussion and action among the multiple stakeholders in the field of prevention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"20 3","pages":"Pages 367-377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0149-7189(97)00016-5","citationCount":"99","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718997000165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 99

Abstract

In the past decade, government agencies and foundations have funded numerous community-driven initiatives in the area of prevention that have demonstrated mixed results in terms of outcomes and impacts. This article addresses several challenges faced by community-driven initiatives that may limit the attainment of significant program outcomes. A preliminary framework is presented that identifies the current state of prevention practice, the contributions of prevention science, and the barriers that limit the reciprocal transfer of knowledge between practice and science. Evaluation strategies are also presented which address these barriers, potentially bridging the gap between prevention science and prevention practice. The perspectives of those in the field are included through the presentation of the results of a survey of 101 Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) project directors, evaluators, and consultants. Although the focus is on evaluator and practitioner perspectives, the purpose of the paper is to stimulate discussion and action among the multiple stakeholders in the field of prevention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立一个框架,弥合科学与预防实践之间的差距:侧重于评价者和实践者的观点
在过去十年中,政府机构和基金会在预防领域资助了许多社区驱动的行动,这些行动在结果和影响方面显示出好坏参半的结果。本文讨论了社区驱动的计划所面临的几个挑战,这些挑战可能会限制重大计划成果的实现。提出了一个初步框架,确定了预防实践的现状,预防科学的贡献,以及限制实践与科学之间知识相互转移的障碍。还提出了解决这些障碍的评价战略,有可能弥合预防科学与预防实践之间的差距。101药物滥用预防中心(CSAP)项目主管、评估人员和顾问的调查结果,包括了该领域人士的观点。虽然重点是评价者和实践者的观点,但该文件的目的是促进预防领域的多个利益攸关方之间的讨论和行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Sustainable Development Goals as a Driving Force in the Development of Medical Tourism Accounting and system dynamics simulation of water resource liabilities in the Yangtze River Economic Zone, China Building the capacity of early-stage investigators to conduct community-engaged health disparities research Development of a brief telehealth-delivered counseling intervention to reduce suicide risk and improve HIV care engagement in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania Modelling and classification of barriers in the construction of smart villages in developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1