Do drivers drink more when they use a safe ride?

Wayne M. Harding , Barry D. Caudill , Brent A. Moore , Kevin C. Frissell
{"title":"Do drivers drink more when they use a safe ride?","authors":"Wayne M. Harding ,&nbsp;Barry D. Caudill ,&nbsp;Brent A. Moore ,&nbsp;Kevin C. Frissell","doi":"10.1016/S0899-3289(01)00085-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> Offering drinkers free safe rides (SRs) home can prevent DWI, but some suggest that it may also promote excessive drinking. <strong>Methods:</strong> Forty-two respondents to surveys completed by 472 drinkers in barrooms reported that they used a SR during the first 9 months they were offered. <strong>Results:</strong> Their usual estimated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was significantly greater when they used a SR than on all occasions when they drank outside their homes. However, only 24% of respondents increased their usual BAC from a “low risk” category (BAC&lt;0.10) when drinking outside the home, to a “high risk” category (BAC≥0.10) when using a SR. The majority (72%) of respondents did not change their BAC categories. One decreased his/her BAC from ≥0.10 when drinking outside the home to &lt;0.10 when using a SR. <strong>Implications:</strong> These findings, coupled with data showing that respondents tended to use SRs infrequently (3.69 times per year), reduce concerns about the mean increase in their BACs when using SRs. Findings do not, however, resolve the issue of whether respondents whose drinking increased when they used a SR did so because a SR was available, or decided not to drive because they drank more. Recommendations for improving SR programs are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0899-3289(01)00085-2","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899328901000852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Purpose: Offering drinkers free safe rides (SRs) home can prevent DWI, but some suggest that it may also promote excessive drinking. Methods: Forty-two respondents to surveys completed by 472 drinkers in barrooms reported that they used a SR during the first 9 months they were offered. Results: Their usual estimated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was significantly greater when they used a SR than on all occasions when they drank outside their homes. However, only 24% of respondents increased their usual BAC from a “low risk” category (BAC<0.10) when drinking outside the home, to a “high risk” category (BAC≥0.10) when using a SR. The majority (72%) of respondents did not change their BAC categories. One decreased his/her BAC from ≥0.10 when drinking outside the home to <0.10 when using a SR. Implications: These findings, coupled with data showing that respondents tended to use SRs infrequently (3.69 times per year), reduce concerns about the mean increase in their BACs when using SRs. Findings do not, however, resolve the issue of whether respondents whose drinking increased when they used a SR did so because a SR was available, or decided not to drive because they drank more. Recommendations for improving SR programs are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
司机在使用安全驾驶时是否会喝得更多?
目的:为饮酒者提供免费的安全接送(SRs)可以防止酒后驾车,但也有人认为这可能会促进过度饮酒。方法:在对472名酒吧饮酒者的调查中,42名受访者报告说,他们在最初的9个月里使用了SR。结果:当他们使用SR时,他们通常估计的血液酒精浓度(BAC)明显高于他们在室外喝酒时的所有情况。然而,只有24%的受访者在室外饮酒时将其通常的BAC从“低风险”类别(BAC<0.10)增加到使用sr时的“高风险”类别(BAC≥0.10)。大多数(72%)受访者没有改变他们的BAC类别。其中一人在室外饮酒时将其BAC从≥0.10降低到使用sr时的0.10。含义:这些发现,加上数据显示受访者倾向于不经常使用sr(每年3.69次),减少了对使用sr时其BAC平均增加的担忧。然而,调查结果并没有解决这样一个问题,即当受访者使用禁酒令时,他们的饮酒量增加了,是因为有禁酒令,还是因为他们喝得更多而决定不开车。讨论了改进SR程序的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Childhood emotional abuse and depression: The mediating roles of emotion regulation and resilience From night owl to angry bird: Investigating the association between chronotype and aggression ‘You never cared about me’: An analysis of ethnic minority men’s coping mechanisms and risk factors after a relationship breakdown Change in psychosocial functioning and social relations among women in residential substance abuse treatment Prediction of DISC substance abuse and dependency for ethnically diverse adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1