25. Positron Emission Tomography in Hodgkin's Disease

A A Rifai M.D. , S Bazarbashi M.D. , A Kandil M.D.
{"title":"25. Positron Emission Tomography in Hodgkin's Disease","authors":"A A Rifai M.D. ,&nbsp;S Bazarbashi M.D. ,&nbsp;A Kandil M.D.","doi":"10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00091-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> To compare the sensitivity of F18 - FDG Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Computed Tomography (CT) and Planar Gallium 67-Citrate (GS) in the diagnosis of Hodgkin's Disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> Thirty (30) adult patients with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of Hodgkin's Disease between Oct 97 and June 98 at KFSH &amp; RC had the three diagnostic imaging modalities for the initial work up; in twenty eight patients for newly diagnosed and in two patients for recurrent disease. Nodular sclerosis was the histological subtype in 25 patients, mixed cellularity in 3 and lymphocytic predominance in 2.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> For the initial evaluation of the results, a positive site by any of the three diagnostic imaging modalities was considered actual location of the disease. The patient-site sensitivity of PET, CT and for GS were 93.33%, 80% and 53.3% respectively. False negative results were observed in 2 patients with PET, 7 with CT and 14 with GS. The Spleen was the commonest site for false negative result in GS (4 patients) axilla and bones in CT (2 patients each), the 2 patients with false negative results with PET were in the lung. The difference in sensitivity between PET and GS was statistically significant (P = 0.002), but was not significant between PET and CT (P = 0.18). Although CT showed better sensitivity and accuracy when compared with GS, that didn't reach statistical significance (P = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> PET Scan has the highest sensitivity in the initial evaluation in this small group of patients with Hodgkin Disease, especially when compared with GS. Evaluations of the final sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of these imaging modalities will be presented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","volume":"3 4","pages":"Page 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00091-1","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095039700000911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the sensitivity of F18 - FDG Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Computed Tomography (CT) and Planar Gallium 67-Citrate (GS) in the diagnosis of Hodgkin's Disease.

Materials and Methods: Thirty (30) adult patients with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of Hodgkin's Disease between Oct 97 and June 98 at KFSH & RC had the three diagnostic imaging modalities for the initial work up; in twenty eight patients for newly diagnosed and in two patients for recurrent disease. Nodular sclerosis was the histological subtype in 25 patients, mixed cellularity in 3 and lymphocytic predominance in 2.

Results: For the initial evaluation of the results, a positive site by any of the three diagnostic imaging modalities was considered actual location of the disease. The patient-site sensitivity of PET, CT and for GS were 93.33%, 80% and 53.3% respectively. False negative results were observed in 2 patients with PET, 7 with CT and 14 with GS. The Spleen was the commonest site for false negative result in GS (4 patients) axilla and bones in CT (2 patients each), the 2 patients with false negative results with PET were in the lung. The difference in sensitivity between PET and GS was statistically significant (P = 0.002), but was not significant between PET and CT (P = 0.18). Although CT showed better sensitivity and accuracy when compared with GS, that didn't reach statistical significance (P = 0.09).

Conclusion: PET Scan has the highest sensitivity in the initial evaluation in this small group of patients with Hodgkin Disease, especially when compared with GS. Evaluations of the final sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of these imaging modalities will be presented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
25. 霍奇金病的正电子发射断层扫描
目的:比较F18 - FDG正电子发射断层扫描(PET)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和平面67-柠檬酸镓(GS)对霍奇金病的诊断敏感性。材料和方法:1997年10月至1998年6月在KFSH和amp进行组织病理学确诊的霍奇金病成年患者30例。RC在最初的工作中有三种诊断成像模式;其中28例为新诊断,2例为复发性疾病。结节性硬化25例为组织学亚型,3例为混合细胞型,2例为淋巴细胞型。结果:对于结果的初步评估,任何三种诊断成像方式的阳性部位都被认为是疾病的实际位置。PET、CT和GS的患者部位敏感性分别为93.33%、80%和53.3%。PET假阴性2例,CT假阴性7例,GS假阴性14例。GS假阴性多见于脾脏(4例),CT假阴性多见于腋窝和骨骼(各2例),PET假阴性2例见于肺部。PET与GS的敏感性差异有统计学意义(P = 0.002), PET与CT的敏感性差异无统计学意义(P = 0.18)。虽然CT与GS相比具有更好的敏感性和准确性,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.09)。结论:PET扫描在这一小群霍奇金病患者的初步评估中具有最高的敏感性,特别是与GS相比。这些成像方式的最终灵敏度,特异性和准确性的评估将被提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combined PET/CT Imaging in Oncology Attenuation-Correction Induced Artifact in F-18 FDG PET Imaging Following Total Knee Replacement Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and the Changing Face of China Clinical Impact of 18F-FDG-PET in the Suspicion of Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma Based on Elevated Tumor Marker Serum Levels Superphysiologic FDG Uptake in the Non-Paralyzed Vocal Cord. Resolution of a False-Positive PET Result with Combined PET-CT Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1