Reducing Sharps Injuries Among Health Care Workers: A Sharps Container Quality Improvement Project

Irene B. Hatcher MSN, RNC
{"title":"Reducing Sharps Injuries Among Health Care Workers: A Sharps Container Quality Improvement Project","authors":"Irene B. Hatcher MSN, RNC","doi":"10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28041-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Many needlestick injuries at Vanderbilt University Medical Center were found to be related to the method of disposal in sharps containers. The “straight-drop” system allowed staff to stuff more needles into a full box, resulting in needlestick injuries. This was also a common problem elsewhere, as reflected in the literature.</p></div><div><h3>Analyzing the problem</h3><p>A multidisciplinary committee reviewed other sharps containers, piloted one, found problems, and then piloted and selected another. Implementation was complex and difficult, but focus was kept on the goal of decreased needlestick injuries. Staff identified other problems, which were taken to the manufacturer of the sharps container selected and resulted in product design changes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Several months after implementation, data analysis showed that the needlestick injury rate was reduced by two-thirds, a statistically significant change (<em>p</em> = 0.002). Despite the increased cost of the sharps container, savings of prevented needlestick injuries represented a total cost savings to the medical center of more than $62,000 a year.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This experience is an example of real-life implementation—and the problems institutions may have to overcome before success can be realized.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79382,"journal":{"name":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","volume":"28 7","pages":"Pages 410-414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28041-4","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324102280414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Background

Many needlestick injuries at Vanderbilt University Medical Center were found to be related to the method of disposal in sharps containers. The “straight-drop” system allowed staff to stuff more needles into a full box, resulting in needlestick injuries. This was also a common problem elsewhere, as reflected in the literature.

Analyzing the problem

A multidisciplinary committee reviewed other sharps containers, piloted one, found problems, and then piloted and selected another. Implementation was complex and difficult, but focus was kept on the goal of decreased needlestick injuries. Staff identified other problems, which were taken to the manufacturer of the sharps container selected and resulted in product design changes.

Results

Several months after implementation, data analysis showed that the needlestick injury rate was reduced by two-thirds, a statistically significant change (p = 0.002). Despite the increased cost of the sharps container, savings of prevented needlestick injuries represented a total cost savings to the medical center of more than $62,000 a year.

Discussion

This experience is an example of real-life implementation—and the problems institutions may have to overcome before success can be realized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少卫生保健工作者的锐器伤害:锐器容器质量改进项目
范德比尔特大学医学中心的许多针刺伤被发现与在尖锐容器中的处置方法有关。“直滴”系统允许工作人员在一个满的盒子里塞更多的针头,导致针刺伤。正如文献所反映的那样,这在其他地方也是一个普遍的问题。一个多学科委员会审查了其他尖锐容器,试点一个,发现问题,然后试点和选择另一个。实施是复杂和困难的,但重点放在减少针刺伤害的目标上。工作人员发现了其他问题,这些问题被带到所选尖锐容器的制造商,并导致产品设计更改。结果实施几个月后,数据分析显示,针刺伤发生率降低了三分之二,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.002)。尽管尖锐容器的费用增加了,但预防针刺伤害的节省意味着医疗中心每年节省的总费用超过62 000美元。这一经验是现实生活中实施的一个例子,也是机构在实现成功之前可能必须克服的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Hydroxyurea Treatment on Haemolysis in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania. Introduction Advocacy: The Lexington Veterans Affairs Medical Center John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety Awards. Research: David W. Bates, MD, MSc, Brigham and Women's Hospital. Interview by Steven Berman. System Innovation: Veterans Health Administration National Center for Patient Safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1