{"title":"REJOINDER TO JONATHAN SMITH, RESEARCH NOTE ON SHUN 舜","authors":"Adam D. 當 Smith 亞","doi":"10.1017/eac.2018.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In his Research Note, “Shun 舜 and the Interpretation of Early Orthographical Variation,” in this issue of Early China, Jonathan Smith made several claims about the early evolution of the graph 舜, in particular suggesting that it should be identified with the graph lin 粦 that occurs in certain Western Zhou bronze inscriptions. While showing that these claims are ill-supported, I nevertheless concur in the identification with the bronze-inscriptional graph, but show that the word being written is 濬 ~ 浚 “deep, profound” and in no way connected with lin 粦. 提要 Jonathan M. Smith 提出了有關“舜”之古文字寫法的一些觀點,並指出“舜”字與見於西周銅器銘文中過去被釋為“粦”的一個字具有發展演變關係。本文認爲 Jonathan Smith 提出的部分觀點是不正確的,但同時認爲西周金文中所謂“粦”字確實與“舜”字有密切關係,只不過將該字釋為“粦”還不如讀之為“濬 ”或“浚”。","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2018.16","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2018.16","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract In his Research Note, “Shun 舜 and the Interpretation of Early Orthographical Variation,” in this issue of Early China, Jonathan Smith made several claims about the early evolution of the graph 舜, in particular suggesting that it should be identified with the graph lin 粦 that occurs in certain Western Zhou bronze inscriptions. While showing that these claims are ill-supported, I nevertheless concur in the identification with the bronze-inscriptional graph, but show that the word being written is 濬 ~ 浚 “deep, profound” and in no way connected with lin 粦. 提要 Jonathan M. Smith 提出了有關“舜”之古文字寫法的一些觀點,並指出“舜”字與見於西周銅器銘文中過去被釋為“粦”的一個字具有發展演變關係。本文認爲 Jonathan Smith 提出的部分觀點是不正確的,但同時認爲西周金文中所謂“粦”字確實與“舜”字有密切關係,只不過將該字釋為“粦”還不如讀之為“濬 ”或“浚”。
Abstract In his Research Note, “Shun 舜 and the Interpretation of Early Orthographical Variation,” in this issue of Early China, Jonathan Smith made several claims about the early evolution of the graph 舜, in particular suggesting that it should be identified with the graph lin 粦 that occurs in certain Western Zhou bronze inscriptions. While showing that these claims are ill-supported, I nevertheless concur in the identification with the bronze-inscriptional graph, but show that the word being written is 濬 ~ 浚 “deep, profound” and in no way connected with lin 粦. 提要 Jonathan M. Smith 提出了有关“舜”之古文字写法的一些观点,并指出“舜”字与见于西周铜器铭文中过去被释为“粦”的一个字具有发展演变关系。本文认为 Jonathan Smith 提出的部分观点是不正确的,但同时认为西周金文中所谓“粦”字确实与“舜”字有密切关系,只不过将该字释为“粦”还不如读之为“濬 ”或“浚”。
期刊介绍:
Early China publishes original research on all aspects of the culture and civilization of China from earliest times through the Han dynasty period (CE 220). The journal is interdisciplinary in scope, including articles on Chinese archaeology, history, philosophy, religion, literature, and paleography. It is the only English-language journal to publish solely on early China, and to include information on all relevant publications in all languages. The journal is of interest to scholars of archaeology and of other ancient cultures as well as sinologists.