Comparison of two formulae for the calculation of glomerular filtration in the dosage of zoledronic acid

E. Ramírez Herráiz , N. Garrido Peño , R. Díez Fernández , A.M. Iglesias Bolaños , M. Arteta Jiménez
{"title":"Comparison of two formulae for the calculation of glomerular filtration in the dosage of zoledronic acid","authors":"E. Ramírez Herráiz ,&nbsp;N. Garrido Peño ,&nbsp;R. Díez Fernández ,&nbsp;A.M. Iglesias Bolaños ,&nbsp;M. Arteta Jiménez","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70065-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To validate the use of a formula that does not require the patient's weight (Levey formula) for calculating creatinine clearance in the adjustment of the dosage of zoledronic acid.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Prospective observational study in which zoledronic acid prescriptions in the Oncology and Haematology departments were recorded over the course of 8 months. The adjustment of the dose of zoledronic acid was carried out in accordance with creatinine clearance obtained using 2 different equations; the Cockcroft-Gault equation which is based on medical records, and the Levey formula which does not require the patient's weight for the calculation. The results of zoledronic acid dosage from both equations were compared using the SPSS statistics programme, via the comparison of the 2 measurements using the t Student-Fisher (t test).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The t test provided a t test value of t<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−3.366, with 112 degrees of freedom and a degree of bilateral importance of P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.001. The difference between both measurements was d<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.051[0.162]) and the confidence interval was 95%, −0.082 to −0.021. From the data obtained in the t test, the degree of bilateral importance (P=.001 &lt;.05) indicated that the results of the test were statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The difference between the dosages obtained when comparing both methods of glomerular filtration is statistically significant, although not clinically relevant, therefore the MDRD-4 formula (Levey) could be used if the patient's weight is not available.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 26-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70065-6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508509700656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To validate the use of a formula that does not require the patient's weight (Levey formula) for calculating creatinine clearance in the adjustment of the dosage of zoledronic acid.

Method

Prospective observational study in which zoledronic acid prescriptions in the Oncology and Haematology departments were recorded over the course of 8 months. The adjustment of the dose of zoledronic acid was carried out in accordance with creatinine clearance obtained using 2 different equations; the Cockcroft-Gault equation which is based on medical records, and the Levey formula which does not require the patient's weight for the calculation. The results of zoledronic acid dosage from both equations were compared using the SPSS statistics programme, via the comparison of the 2 measurements using the t Student-Fisher (t test).

Results

The t test provided a t test value of t = −3.366, with 112 degrees of freedom and a degree of bilateral importance of P = .001. The difference between both measurements was d = −0.051[0.162]) and the confidence interval was 95%, −0.082 to −0.021. From the data obtained in the t test, the degree of bilateral importance (P=.001 <.05) indicated that the results of the test were statistically significant.

Conclusions

The difference between the dosages obtained when comparing both methods of glomerular filtration is statistically significant, although not clinically relevant, therefore the MDRD-4 formula (Levey) could be used if the patient's weight is not available.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种计算唑来膦酸剂量肾小球滤过率公式的比较
目的验证在调整唑来膦酸剂量时使用不需要体重的计算公式(Levey公式)计算肌酐清除率的可行性。方法前瞻性观察研究,记录肿瘤和血液科8个月的唑来膦酸处方。根据2种不同方程得到的肌酐清除率进行唑来膦酸剂量的调整;基于医疗记录的Cockcroft-Gault方程,以及不需要病人体重计算的Levey公式。使用SPSS统计程序对两个方程的唑来膦酸剂量结果进行比较,采用t- Student-Fisher (t检验)对两个测量值进行比较。结果t检验的t检验值为t = - 3.366,自由度为112,双侧重要度P = 0.001。两个测量值之间的差异为d = - 0.051[0.162]),置信区间为95%,为- 0.082至- 0.021。从t检验得到的数据来看,双侧重要程度(P=。0.001 <.05)表明检验结果具有统计学意义。结论对比两种肾小球滤过法所得剂量差异有统计学意义,但无临床相关性,故在患者体重不详时可采用MDRD-4公式(Levey)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity Profile and Adherence to the Pharmacotherapeutic Regimen of Gemcitabine–carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System Effectiveness and Use of Linezolid in Hospitalisation Wards Application of the Technology Web 2.0 in a Drug Information Centre Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1