New technologies applied to the medication-dispensing process, error analysis and contributing factors

A.M. Álvarez Díaz, E. Delgado Silveira, C. Pérez Menéndez-Conde, R. Pintor Recuenco, E. Gómez de Salazar López de Silanes, J. Serna Pérez, T. Mendoza Jiménez, T. Bermejo Vicedo
{"title":"New technologies applied to the medication-dispensing process, error analysis and contributing factors","authors":"A.M. Álvarez Díaz,&nbsp;E. Delgado Silveira,&nbsp;C. Pérez Menéndez-Conde,&nbsp;R. Pintor Recuenco,&nbsp;E. Gómez de Salazar López de Silanes,&nbsp;J. Serna Pérez,&nbsp;T. Mendoza Jiménez,&nbsp;T. Bermejo Vicedo","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(10)70001-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Calculate error prevalence occurred in different medication-dispensing systems, the stages of occurrence, and contributing factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>Prospective observational study. The staging of the dispensing process were reviewed in five dispensing systems: Stock, Unitary-Dose dispensing systems (UDDS) without Computerised Prescription Order Entry (CPOE), CPOE-UDDS, Automated Dispensing Systems (ADS) without CPOE and CPOE-ADS. Dispensing errors were identified, together with the stages of occurrence of such errors and their contributing factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two thousand one hundred eighty one errors were detected among 54,169 opportunities of error. Error-rate: Stock, 10.7%; no-CPOE-UDDS, 3.7%, CPOE-UDDS, 2.2%, no-CPOE-ADS, 20.7%; CPOE-ADS, 2.9%. Most frequent stage when error occurs: Stock, preparation of order; no-CPOEUDDS and CPOE-UDDS, filling of the unit dose cart; no-CPOE-ADS and CPOE-ADS, filling of the ADS. Most frequent error: Stock, no-CPOE-ADS and CPOE-ADS, omission; CPOE-UDDS, different amount of drug and no-CPOE-UDDS, extra medication. Contributing factor: Stock, CPOE-ADS and no-CPOE-ADS, stock out/supply problems; CPOE-UDDS, inexperienced personnel and deficient communication system between professionals; no-CPOE-UDDS, deficient communication system between professionals.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Applying new technologies to the dispensing process has increased its safety, particularly, implementation of CPOE has enabled to reduce dispensing errors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 59-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(10)70001-0","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508510700010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective

Calculate error prevalence occurred in different medication-dispensing systems, the stages of occurrence, and contributing factors.

Methodology

Prospective observational study. The staging of the dispensing process were reviewed in five dispensing systems: Stock, Unitary-Dose dispensing systems (UDDS) without Computerised Prescription Order Entry (CPOE), CPOE-UDDS, Automated Dispensing Systems (ADS) without CPOE and CPOE-ADS. Dispensing errors were identified, together with the stages of occurrence of such errors and their contributing factors.

Results

Two thousand one hundred eighty one errors were detected among 54,169 opportunities of error. Error-rate: Stock, 10.7%; no-CPOE-UDDS, 3.7%, CPOE-UDDS, 2.2%, no-CPOE-ADS, 20.7%; CPOE-ADS, 2.9%. Most frequent stage when error occurs: Stock, preparation of order; no-CPOEUDDS and CPOE-UDDS, filling of the unit dose cart; no-CPOE-ADS and CPOE-ADS, filling of the ADS. Most frequent error: Stock, no-CPOE-ADS and CPOE-ADS, omission; CPOE-UDDS, different amount of drug and no-CPOE-UDDS, extra medication. Contributing factor: Stock, CPOE-ADS and no-CPOE-ADS, stock out/supply problems; CPOE-UDDS, inexperienced personnel and deficient communication system between professionals; no-CPOE-UDDS, deficient communication system between professionals.

Conclusions

Applying new technologies to the dispensing process has increased its safety, particularly, implementation of CPOE has enabled to reduce dispensing errors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
配药过程中应用的新技术、误差分析及影响因素
目的了解不同药品调剂系统的差错发生率、发生阶段及影响因素。方法:前瞻性观察研究。在五种配药系统中回顾了配药过程的分期:库存、没有计算机化处方单输入(CPOE)的单一剂量配药系统(UDDS)、CPOE-UDDS、没有CPOE的自动配药系统(ADS)和CPOE-ADS。确定了配药错误,以及发生此类错误的阶段及其促成因素。结果在54,169个错误机会中,检出错误21,881个。错误率:股票,10.7%;无CPOE-UDDS, 3.7%,无CPOE-UDDS, 2.2%,无cpoe - ads, 20.7%;CPOE-ADS, 2.9%。出错最频繁的阶段:备货、准备订单;无cpoeudds和cpoeudds,填充单位剂量车;最常见的错误:Stock, no-CPOE-ADS和CPOE-ADS,遗漏;CPOE-UDDS,不同剂量的药物和没有CPOE-UDDS,额外的药物。促成因素:库存,CPOE-ADS和无CPOE-ADS,缺货/供应问题;CPOE-UDDS,人员经验不足,专业人员沟通系统不足;无cpoe - udds,专业人员之间缺乏沟通系统。结论在配药过程中应用新技术提高了配药的安全性,特别是CPOE的实施减少了配药错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity Profile and Adherence to the Pharmacotherapeutic Regimen of Gemcitabine–carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System Effectiveness and Use of Linezolid in Hospitalisation Wards Application of the Technology Web 2.0 in a Drug Information Centre Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1