{"title":"Application of joint analysis to ongoing training of pharmacy personnel","authors":"R. Arias-Rico","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(10)70011-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Ongoing training by means of clinical sessions constitutes an essential activity for a pharmacy department, being joint analysis useful to adapt the clinical sessions’ characteristics to the preferences of the professionals involved. By means of this study we hope to optimize clinical sessions for their better use and efficiency.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A least squares model was used to assess the usefulness of different clinical session profiles. Data was collected from 14 individual interviews (7 specialists and 7 residents); these interviews consisted in ordering the clinical session profiles by order of preference.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The most valued attributes were duration of sessions (29.9%) and the structure of teaching content (27.8%) in both groups studied; although the duration of the sessions was assigned greater value by the group of residents (31.1% vs. 27.2%). The availability of bibliographical references was the third attribute most valued (17.9%), and the two last attributes by order of importance were availability of a copy in files for storage (13.8%) and multimedia content (10.5%).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The adaptation of clinical sessions as an integral part of ongoing training leads us to see that we can modify the duration, content structure and availability of bibliographical references so as to adapt them to the preferences of the professionals involved. However, according to the population surveyed, other attributes are of little importance</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 181-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(10)70011-3","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508510700113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction
Ongoing training by means of clinical sessions constitutes an essential activity for a pharmacy department, being joint analysis useful to adapt the clinical sessions’ characteristics to the preferences of the professionals involved. By means of this study we hope to optimize clinical sessions for their better use and efficiency.
Methods
A least squares model was used to assess the usefulness of different clinical session profiles. Data was collected from 14 individual interviews (7 specialists and 7 residents); these interviews consisted in ordering the clinical session profiles by order of preference.
Results
The most valued attributes were duration of sessions (29.9%) and the structure of teaching content (27.8%) in both groups studied; although the duration of the sessions was assigned greater value by the group of residents (31.1% vs. 27.2%). The availability of bibliographical references was the third attribute most valued (17.9%), and the two last attributes by order of importance were availability of a copy in files for storage (13.8%) and multimedia content (10.5%).
Discussion
The adaptation of clinical sessions as an integral part of ongoing training leads us to see that we can modify the duration, content structure and availability of bibliographical references so as to adapt them to the preferences of the professionals involved. However, according to the population surveyed, other attributes are of little importance
通过临床课程进行的持续培训是药学部门的一项基本活动,联合分析有助于使临床课程的特点适应所涉及的专业人员的偏好。通过这项研究,我们希望优化临床阶段,以更好地使用和提高效率。方法采用最小二乘模型评价不同临床阶段资料的有效性。数据收集自14个单独访谈(7名专家和7名住院医师);这些访谈包括按偏好顺序排列临床会议档案。结果两组学生最看重的属性是课程时长(29.9%)和教学内容结构(27.8%);尽管住院医师组认为疗程的持续时间更重要(31.1% vs. 27.2%)。参考书目的可用性是第三个最受重视的属性(17.9%),最后两个属性按重要性排序是文件副本的可用性(13.8%)和多媒体内容(10.5%)。作为持续培训的一个组成部分,临床课程的适应使我们看到,我们可以修改参考书目的持续时间、内容结构和可用性,以适应所涉及的专业人员的偏好。然而,根据接受调查的人口,其他属性并不重要