A critical review of methods used to determine phosphorus and digestible amino acid matrices when using phytase in poultry and pig diets

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1017/JAN.2019.1
Y. Dersjant-Li, M. Hruby, C. Evans, R. Greiner
{"title":"A critical review of methods used to determine phosphorus and digestible amino acid matrices when using phytase in poultry and pig diets","authors":"Y. Dersjant-Li, M. Hruby, C. Evans, R. Greiner","doi":"10.1017/JAN.2019.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phytase is applied in animal feed based on its standard activity measured at pH 5.5, however the relative activity at pH 3 (e.g. stomach pH, the main site for the breakdown of phytate) varies among the commercial phytases, ranging from 56% (an E coli phytase) to 235% (Buttiauxella phytase). These diverse sources of phytases have varying capability for degrading phytate and, correspondingly, different P, digestible amino acid and metabolisable energy matrix values. In addition, the matrix values recommended by different phytase suppliers are not comparable, as different methodologies have been used to determine them. Phosphorus (P) and other matrix values can be determined by direct measurement of digestible P (dP) improvements by the addition of phytase above a negative control in large numbers of in vivo studies using increasing phytase doses. Alternatively, matrix values can be assessed by indirect measurement, using inorganic P (usually mono- or dicalcium sources) as a reference, typically based on tibia or metacarpal ash as a response parameter to estimate available P equivalence, either at a single or different phytase doses. When using the indirect measurement, the available P equivalence with increasing phytase doses may be calculated based on a log linear model. Although both methods are acceptable methodologies, direct measurement may under-estimate and indirect measurement may over-estimate matrix values, and a large number of in vivo studies give the best estimates of matrix values. Phytase efficacy can be influenced by phytase source, dose level, dietary composition (Ca level and Ca: P ratio). Phytase end users are encouraged to be aware of the methods used by suppliers to determine matrix values, before applying them in their feed formulations.","PeriodicalId":36124,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/JAN.2019.1","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/JAN.2019.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Phytase is applied in animal feed based on its standard activity measured at pH 5.5, however the relative activity at pH 3 (e.g. stomach pH, the main site for the breakdown of phytate) varies among the commercial phytases, ranging from 56% (an E coli phytase) to 235% (Buttiauxella phytase). These diverse sources of phytases have varying capability for degrading phytate and, correspondingly, different P, digestible amino acid and metabolisable energy matrix values. In addition, the matrix values recommended by different phytase suppliers are not comparable, as different methodologies have been used to determine them. Phosphorus (P) and other matrix values can be determined by direct measurement of digestible P (dP) improvements by the addition of phytase above a negative control in large numbers of in vivo studies using increasing phytase doses. Alternatively, matrix values can be assessed by indirect measurement, using inorganic P (usually mono- or dicalcium sources) as a reference, typically based on tibia or metacarpal ash as a response parameter to estimate available P equivalence, either at a single or different phytase doses. When using the indirect measurement, the available P equivalence with increasing phytase doses may be calculated based on a log linear model. Although both methods are acceptable methodologies, direct measurement may under-estimate and indirect measurement may over-estimate matrix values, and a large number of in vivo studies give the best estimates of matrix values. Phytase efficacy can be influenced by phytase source, dose level, dietary composition (Ca level and Ca: P ratio). Phytase end users are encouraged to be aware of the methods used by suppliers to determine matrix values, before applying them in their feed formulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在家禽和猪饲粮中使用植酸酶时,用于测定磷和可消化氨基酸基质的方法的重要回顾
植酸酶在动物饲料中的应用是基于其在pH值为5.5时的标准活性,然而在pH值为3时的相对活性(例如胃pH值,植酸盐分解的主要部位)因商业植酸酶而异,从56%(大肠杆菌植酸酶)到235% (Buttiauxella植酸酶)不等。这些不同来源的植酸酶具有不同的降解植酸的能力,相应的,也有不同的P、可消化氨基酸和代谢能基质值。此外,不同植酸酶供应商推荐的基质值不具有可比性,因为使用了不同的方法来确定它们。在大量增加植酸酶剂量的体内研究中,可以通过在阴性对照之上添加植酸酶直接测量可消化P (dP)的改善来确定磷(P)和其他基质值。或者,基质值可以通过间接测量来评估,使用无机磷(通常是单钙或双钙源)作为参考,通常基于胫骨或掌骨灰分作为响应参数,以估计单一或不同植酸酶剂量下可用的磷当量。当使用间接测量时,随着植酸酶剂量的增加,可用的P当量可以基于对数线性模型计算。虽然这两种方法都是可接受的方法,但直接测量可能会低估基质值,间接测量可能会高估基质值,而大量的体内研究给出了基质值的最佳估计。植酸酶的功效受植酸酶来源、剂量水平、饲粮组成(钙水平和钙磷比)的影响。鼓励植酸酶最终用户在将其应用于饲料配方之前了解供应商用于确定基质值的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition
Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Corn fermented protein, an alternative protein to soybean meal to support growth in young turkey poults Matrix uncertainty in feeding-stuffs according to ISO 19036:2019 Influence of graded levels of maize distillers dried grains with solubles (mDDGS) on the performance, digestive tract development and carcass characteristics of broilers Impact and adoption of feed technologies at Nharira-Lancashire Dairy Scheme The effect of dietary olive polyphenols on markers of inflammation and bodyweight in senior domestic cats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1