Evidence-Based Decision Making as a Tool for Continuous Professional Development in the Medical Radiation Technologies

Robert Gilbert PhD. , Karren Fader B.HSc., R.T.N.M.
{"title":"Evidence-Based Decision Making as a Tool for Continuous Professional Development in the Medical Radiation Technologies","authors":"Robert Gilbert PhD. ,&nbsp;Karren Fader B.HSc., R.T.N.M.","doi":"10.1016/S0820-5930(09)60234-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>All components of contemporary health care practice must be supported by the best available evidence in order to maximize the potential for successful patient care. As in other disciplines, researched-based evidence is a major contributor to the development of contemporary clinical practice and decision making in the medical radiation technologies.</p><p>However, in recent years a rapid proliferation of clinical studies and journal publications combined with a growing complexity of diagnostic imaging methods has made it difficult for practicing medical radiation technologists (MRT's) to remain current with the relevant clinical research. Because we rely on this clinical research evidence to determine the efficacy and applicability of new diagnostic tests and treatments, it is essential that we possess the skills for the effective procurement and interpretation of the scientific literature. For MRT's, barriers to this task may include lack of training in: defining good clinical questions, the optimal use the bibliographic databases and search engines used in accessing scientific research literature, and the appraisal and integration of acquired research evidence.</p><p>Evidence-based decision making (EBDM) is a systematic process that enables the “conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of the current best evidence in making health care decisions.” 1 The development of this approach is derived in large part by the need to manage information overload. Such information is essential to the management of skyrocketing health care costs, ensuring the delivery of best diagnosis and treatment. When combined with clinical skills and judgments, patient values and expectations, the EBDM approach serves to maximize the potential for achieving successful patient care outcomes. Specifically, the implementation of EBDM has been shown to: close the gap between knowledge and practice, decrease variability in practice, and increase the use of best research evidence in practice thereby improving the level of clinical care provided by health care professionals. In this directed study article, we define the EBDM process as it pertains to medical radiation technologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79737,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology","volume":"38 1","pages":"Pages 39-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0820-5930(09)60234-6","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0820593009602346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

All components of contemporary health care practice must be supported by the best available evidence in order to maximize the potential for successful patient care. As in other disciplines, researched-based evidence is a major contributor to the development of contemporary clinical practice and decision making in the medical radiation technologies.

However, in recent years a rapid proliferation of clinical studies and journal publications combined with a growing complexity of diagnostic imaging methods has made it difficult for practicing medical radiation technologists (MRT's) to remain current with the relevant clinical research. Because we rely on this clinical research evidence to determine the efficacy and applicability of new diagnostic tests and treatments, it is essential that we possess the skills for the effective procurement and interpretation of the scientific literature. For MRT's, barriers to this task may include lack of training in: defining good clinical questions, the optimal use the bibliographic databases and search engines used in accessing scientific research literature, and the appraisal and integration of acquired research evidence.

Evidence-based decision making (EBDM) is a systematic process that enables the “conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of the current best evidence in making health care decisions.” 1 The development of this approach is derived in large part by the need to manage information overload. Such information is essential to the management of skyrocketing health care costs, ensuring the delivery of best diagnosis and treatment. When combined with clinical skills and judgments, patient values and expectations, the EBDM approach serves to maximize the potential for achieving successful patient care outcomes. Specifically, the implementation of EBDM has been shown to: close the gap between knowledge and practice, decrease variability in practice, and increase the use of best research evidence in practice thereby improving the level of clinical care provided by health care professionals. In this directed study article, we define the EBDM process as it pertains to medical radiation technologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循证决策作为医疗放射技术持续专业发展的工具
当代卫生保健实践的所有组成部分都必须得到现有最佳证据的支持,以便最大限度地发挥成功护理患者的潜力。与其他学科一样,基于研究的证据是当代临床实践和医疗放射技术决策发展的主要贡献者。然而,近年来临床研究和期刊出版物的快速增长,加上诊断成像方法的日益复杂,使得执业医疗放射技术人员(MRT)很难跟上相关临床研究的步伐。由于我们依靠这些临床研究证据来确定新的诊断测试和治疗方法的有效性和适用性,因此我们必须具备有效获取和解释科学文献的技能。对于MRT来说,这项任务的障碍可能包括缺乏以下方面的培训:定义好的临床问题,最佳地使用书目数据库和搜索引擎来获取科学研究文献,以及评估和整合获得的研究证据。循证决策(EBDM)是一个系统的过程,它使“认真、明确和明智地使用当前最好的证据来做出卫生保健决策”成为可能。“1这种方法的发展在很大程度上源于管理信息过载的需要。这些信息对于管理暴涨的医疗保健费用、确保提供最佳诊断和治疗至关重要。当与临床技能和判断、患者价值和期望相结合时,EBDM方法可以最大限度地发挥实现成功患者护理结果的潜力。具体而言,EBDM的实施已被证明:缩小知识与实践之间的差距,减少实践中的可变性,并在实践中增加最佳研究证据的使用,从而提高卫生保健专业人员提供的临床护理水平。在这篇定向研究文章中,我们定义了EBDM过程,因为它与医疗辐射技术有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advance Care Planning: What's All the Talk About? Advance Directives in Canada: An Ethical Imperative in a Legal Morass New and Uncharted Territory: Integrative Medicine in the Medical Radiation Sciences Working Alone in MRI? 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)—Is it Ready for Prime Time Clinical Applications?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1