S. Pickl, A. Spettl, Simon Pröll, Stephan Elspass, Werner König, V. Schmidt
{"title":"Linguistic Distances in Dialectometric Intensity Estimation","authors":"S. Pickl, A. Spettl, Simon Pröll, Stephan Elspass, Werner König, V. Schmidt","doi":"10.1017/jlg.2014.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dialectometric intensity estimation as introduced in Rumpf etal. (2009) and Pickl and Rumpf (2011, 2012) is a method for the unsupervised generation of maps visualizing geolinguistic data on the level of linguistic variables. It also extracts spatial information for subsequent statistical analysis. However, as intensity estimation involves geographically conditioned smoothing, this method can lead to undesirable results. Geolinguistically relevant structures such as rivers, political borders or enclaves, for instance, are not taken into account and thus their manifestations in the distributions of linguistic variants are blurred. A possible solution to this problem, as suggested and put to the test in this paper, is to use linguistic distances rather than geographical (Euclidean) distances in the estimation. This methodological adjustment leads to maps which render geolinguistic distributions more faithfully, especially in areas that are deemed critical for the interpretation of the resulting maps and for subsequent statistical analyses of the results.","PeriodicalId":93207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of linguistic geography","volume":"2 1","pages":"25 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jlg.2014.3","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of linguistic geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2014.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
Dialectometric intensity estimation as introduced in Rumpf etal. (2009) and Pickl and Rumpf (2011, 2012) is a method for the unsupervised generation of maps visualizing geolinguistic data on the level of linguistic variables. It also extracts spatial information for subsequent statistical analysis. However, as intensity estimation involves geographically conditioned smoothing, this method can lead to undesirable results. Geolinguistically relevant structures such as rivers, political borders or enclaves, for instance, are not taken into account and thus their manifestations in the distributions of linguistic variants are blurred. A possible solution to this problem, as suggested and put to the test in this paper, is to use linguistic distances rather than geographical (Euclidean) distances in the estimation. This methodological adjustment leads to maps which render geolinguistic distributions more faithfully, especially in areas that are deemed critical for the interpretation of the resulting maps and for subsequent statistical analyses of the results.
在Rumpf etal中介绍的辩证法强度估计。(2009)和Pickl and Rumpf(2011, 2012)是一种在语言变量层面上可视化地理语言数据的无监督生成地图的方法。它还提取空间信息以供后续统计分析。然而,由于强度估计涉及地理条件平滑,这种方法可能导致不希望的结果。例如,与地理语言学相关的结构,如河流、政治边界或飞地,没有考虑在内,因此它们在语言变体分布中的表现是模糊的。这个问题的一个可能的解决方案,正如本文所建议和测试的那样,是在估计中使用语言距离而不是地理(欧几里得)距离。这种方法上的调整使绘制的地图更忠实地反映了地理语言的分布,特别是在那些被认为对所绘地图的解释和随后对结果进行统计分析至关重要的地区。