Responses of Nitrogen Status Indicators to Nitrogen Rates and Soil Moisture in Corn (Zea mays L.)

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Acta Agronomica Sinica Pub Date : 2011-07-01 DOI:10.1016/S1875-2780(11)60035-7
Juan-Juan ZHU , Yin-Li LIANG , Nicolas TREMBLAY
{"title":"Responses of Nitrogen Status Indicators to Nitrogen Rates and Soil Moisture in Corn (Zea mays L.)","authors":"Juan-Juan ZHU ,&nbsp;Yin-Li LIANG ,&nbsp;Nicolas TREMBLAY","doi":"10.1016/S1875-2780(11)60035-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study compared the sensitivity of tissue nitrogen (N) concentration, SPAD readings, Dualex readings, and SPAD/Dualex ratios for assessing the N status of corn (<em>Zea mays</em> L. cv. Pioneer 38B84) under different water supply conditions. A greenhouse trial was conducted with 4 rates of N fertilizer (0, 50, 50+75, and 200 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and 3 watering levels (drought, drought followed by rewatering, and fully-watered). Tissue N concentration, SPAD, Dualex, and SPAD/Dualex values were influenced significantly by N rates and soil water content (SWC). Tissue N concentration, SPAD value, and SPAD/Dualex ratio increased with N rates, whereas Dualex value decreased. In the first phase of reaction to drought, tissue N concentration, SPAD value, and SPAD/Dualex ratio decreased rapidly, but Dualex value increased; however, the opposite pattern of response was observed in the long term. Under rewatering, tissue N concentration, Dualex value, and SPAD/Dualex ratio gradually recovered, whereas SPAD values did not change significantly as they did in the drought treatment. There were highly significant relationships between tissue N concentration and SPAD reading (<em>r</em> = 0.92, <em>P</em> ≤ 0.001), Dualex value (<em>r</em> = (0.86, <em>P</em> ≤ 0.001), or SPAD/Dualex ratio (<em>r</em> = 0.63, <em>P</em> ≤ 0.001). However, SPAD and Dualex values were better predictors of tissue N concentration under drought condition (<em>r</em>= 0.90, <em>P</em> ≤ 0.001 for SPAD; <em>r</em> = −0.83, <em>P</em> ≤ 0.001 for Dualex) than under fully-watered condition (<em>r</em> = 0.39, <em>P</em> ≤ 0.05) for SPAD; <em>r</em> = −;0.44, <em>P</em> ≤ 0.05 for Dualex) at the end of the trial. Among the indicators, Dualex is better to discriminate N treatments with consistent results across SWC levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7085,"journal":{"name":"Acta Agronomica Sinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1875-2780(11)60035-7","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Agronomica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875278011600357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The present study compared the sensitivity of tissue nitrogen (N) concentration, SPAD readings, Dualex readings, and SPAD/Dualex ratios for assessing the N status of corn (Zea mays L. cv. Pioneer 38B84) under different water supply conditions. A greenhouse trial was conducted with 4 rates of N fertilizer (0, 50, 50+75, and 200 kg ha−1) and 3 watering levels (drought, drought followed by rewatering, and fully-watered). Tissue N concentration, SPAD, Dualex, and SPAD/Dualex values were influenced significantly by N rates and soil water content (SWC). Tissue N concentration, SPAD value, and SPAD/Dualex ratio increased with N rates, whereas Dualex value decreased. In the first phase of reaction to drought, tissue N concentration, SPAD value, and SPAD/Dualex ratio decreased rapidly, but Dualex value increased; however, the opposite pattern of response was observed in the long term. Under rewatering, tissue N concentration, Dualex value, and SPAD/Dualex ratio gradually recovered, whereas SPAD values did not change significantly as they did in the drought treatment. There were highly significant relationships between tissue N concentration and SPAD reading (r = 0.92, P ≤ 0.001), Dualex value (r = (0.86, P ≤ 0.001), or SPAD/Dualex ratio (r = 0.63, P ≤ 0.001). However, SPAD and Dualex values were better predictors of tissue N concentration under drought condition (r= 0.90, P ≤ 0.001 for SPAD; r = −0.83, P ≤ 0.001 for Dualex) than under fully-watered condition (r = 0.39, P ≤ 0.05) for SPAD; r = −;0.44, P ≤ 0.05 for Dualex) at the end of the trial. Among the indicators, Dualex is better to discriminate N treatments with consistent results across SWC levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玉米氮素状态指标对施氮量和土壤水分的响应
本研究比较了组织氮(N)浓度、SPAD读数、Dualex读数和SPAD/Dualex比值对玉米(Zea mays L. cv)氮素状况的敏感性。先锋38B84)在不同的供水条件下。采用4种氮肥水平(0、50、50+75和200 kg ha - 1)和3种施肥水平(干旱、干旱后补水和全水)进行温室试验。施氮率和土壤含水量显著影响组织氮浓度、SPAD、Dualex和SPAD/Dualex值。组织N浓度、SPAD值和SPAD/Dualex比值随施氮量的增加而增加,而Dualex值随施氮量的增加而降低。在干旱反应初期,组织氮浓度、SPAD值和SPAD/Dualex比值迅速下降,但Dualex值升高;然而,长期观察到相反的反应模式。复水处理下,组织氮浓度、Dualex值和SPAD/Dualex比值逐渐恢复,而SPAD值变化不像干旱处理时显著。组织氮浓度与SPAD读数(r = 0.92, P≤0.001)、Dualex值(r = 0.86, P≤0.001)、SPAD/Dualex比值(r = 0.63, P≤0.001)呈极显著相关。SPAD值和Dualex值是干旱条件下组织氮浓度的较好预测因子(r= 0.90, SPAD值P≤0.001;Dualex的r =−0.83,P≤0.001)高于SPAD的r = 0.39, P≤0.05;试验结束时r =−;0.44,P≤0.05 (Dualex)。各指标中,Dualex对氮素处理的判别效果较好,且在不同SWC水平上结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Genome-wide association analysis reveals zinc-tolerant loci of rapeseed at germination stage Fine mapping of a major QTL qMES20-10 associated with deep-seeding tolerance in maize and analysis of differentially expressed genes Fine mapping of a major QTL qMES20-10 associated with deep-seeding tolerance in maize and analysis of differentially expressed genes Effects of methodical nitrogen-water distribution management on water and nitrogen use efficiency of rice Interaction Between Two Self-Incompatible Signal Elements, EXO70A1 and ARC1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1