Intimacy Through Casual Sex: Relational Context of Sexual Activity and Affectionate Behaviours

Q3 Psychology Journal of Relationships Research Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1017/jrr.2018.10
Justin R. Garcia, A. Gesselman, S. Massey, Susan M. Seibold-Simpson, A. Merriwether
{"title":"Intimacy Through Casual Sex: Relational Context of Sexual Activity and Affectionate Behaviours","authors":"Justin R. Garcia, A. Gesselman, S. Massey, Susan M. Seibold-Simpson, A. Merriwether","doi":"10.1017/jrr.2018.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Little is known about the role of affectionate behaviours — factors traditionally understood within the context of romantic relationships — in uncommitted ‘casual sex’ encounters. In a sample of U.S. undergraduate emerging adults aged 18–25 years (N = 639) we conducted a preliminary internet-based questionnaire investigation into the role of affectionate behaviours — operationalised here as cuddling, spending the night and cuddling, foreplay, and eye gazing — across two sexual relationship contexts: (committed) traditional romantic relationships and (uncommitted) casual sex encounters. While affectionate behaviours were desired more often in romantic relationships than in casual sexual encounters, many respondents (both men and women) engaged in these affectionate behaviours during casual sexual encounters as well. This was especially pronounced in those who expressed a preference for casual sex encounters over romantic relationships: in a casual sex context these participants were about 1.5 times as likely to cuddle, 1.5 times as likely to spend the night and cuddle, and nearly 5 times as likely to engage in foreplay with a partner. The current study emphasises the importance of considering relationship context in sexuality and relationship research, and the need for further theoretical and empirical research on dimensions of intimacy, including affection, in people's diverse romantic and sexual lives.","PeriodicalId":37757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Relationships Research","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jrr.2018.10","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Relationships Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2018.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract Little is known about the role of affectionate behaviours — factors traditionally understood within the context of romantic relationships — in uncommitted ‘casual sex’ encounters. In a sample of U.S. undergraduate emerging adults aged 18–25 years (N = 639) we conducted a preliminary internet-based questionnaire investigation into the role of affectionate behaviours — operationalised here as cuddling, spending the night and cuddling, foreplay, and eye gazing — across two sexual relationship contexts: (committed) traditional romantic relationships and (uncommitted) casual sex encounters. While affectionate behaviours were desired more often in romantic relationships than in casual sexual encounters, many respondents (both men and women) engaged in these affectionate behaviours during casual sexual encounters as well. This was especially pronounced in those who expressed a preference for casual sex encounters over romantic relationships: in a casual sex context these participants were about 1.5 times as likely to cuddle, 1.5 times as likely to spend the night and cuddle, and nearly 5 times as likely to engage in foreplay with a partner. The current study emphasises the importance of considering relationship context in sexuality and relationship research, and the need for further theoretical and empirical research on dimensions of intimacy, including affection, in people's diverse romantic and sexual lives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过随意性行为的亲密:性活动和亲昵行为的关系背景
人们对感情行为在未承诺的“随意性”相遇中的作用知之甚少,而传统上人们只在浪漫关系的背景下理解这些因素。在18-25岁的美国大学生初成成人样本中(N = 639),我们进行了一项初步的基于互联网的问卷调查,调查了两种性关系背景下深情行为的作用——在这里被操作为拥抱、过夜和拥抱、前戏和凝视——(承诺的)传统浪漫关系和(未承诺的)随意性接触。虽然在浪漫关系中比在偶然的性接触中更需要深情的行为,但许多受访者(包括男性和女性)在偶然的性接触中也会有这些深情的行为。这一点在那些表示更喜欢随意性接触而不是浪漫关系的人身上尤为明显:在随意性环境中,这些参与者拥抱的可能性是一般人的1.5倍,过夜和拥抱的可能性是一般人的1.5倍,与伴侣进行前戏的可能性是一般人的近5倍。目前的研究强调了在性行为和关系研究中考虑关系背景的重要性,以及在人们不同的浪漫生活和性生活中对亲密关系的维度(包括情感)进行进一步的理论和实证研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Relationships Research
Journal of Relationships Research Psychology-Social Psychology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This innovative journal provides researchers and practitioners with access to quality, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed articles covering the entire range of fields associated with personal, intimate, organizational and family, and social relationships, development, training and analysis of human relationship skills across the life-span. Originally an initiative of the Psychology of Relationships Interest Group of the Australian Psychological Society, the journal became independent within its first year with the intention of publishing papers from the full array of researchers of relationship. The journal features an experienced and eclectic international Editorial Board and is international in its reach. There is a special emphasis on contributions from Asia, including the subcontinent and Pacific regions but the journal welcomes papers from all other parts of the world.
期刊最新文献
Factor Structure and Convergent Validity of the Portuguese version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems – 32 A Longitudinal Test of Relational Turbulence Theory Physical Attraction Scale — Short Version: Cross-Cultural Validation Perceptions of Sex Offenders’ Partners: Associated with Perceptions of Offenders and Influenced by Attachment Changes and Challenges: Parenting Challenges in Iranian Mothers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1