Euripides, Troades 95-7

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS Antichthon Pub Date : 1991-01-01 DOI:10.1017/S0066477400000605
M. Dyson
{"title":"Euripides, Troades 95-7","authors":"M. Dyson","doi":"10.1017/S0066477400000605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With this reflection on mortal folly Poseidon concludes the divine prologue of Euripides' Troades. This text was printed by Murray with the addition of a comma at the end of line 95, but Diggle accepts Page's emendation I shall argue that the manuscript reading gives perfect sense and that, since it is good Greek, there is no need for emendation. D. Kovacs has pointed out that these lines make no mention of desecration, for to bring temples into desolation () is quite different from desecrating them. Further, since it is regularly assumed in Greek thought that cities can be sacked without sacrilege, the folly on which Poseidon comments does not consist in a victor's incurring divine punishment simply by the act of sacking a city. I agree with Kovacs on these points and believe that his argument refutes the widely held view that in these lines Euripides is condemning on moral or religious grounds the sacking of cities in general.","PeriodicalId":41516,"journal":{"name":"Antichthon","volume":"25 1","pages":"27 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0066477400000605","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antichthon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066477400000605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With this reflection on mortal folly Poseidon concludes the divine prologue of Euripides' Troades. This text was printed by Murray with the addition of a comma at the end of line 95, but Diggle accepts Page's emendation I shall argue that the manuscript reading gives perfect sense and that, since it is good Greek, there is no need for emendation. D. Kovacs has pointed out that these lines make no mention of desecration, for to bring temples into desolation () is quite different from desecrating them. Further, since it is regularly assumed in Greek thought that cities can be sacked without sacrilege, the folly on which Poseidon comments does not consist in a victor's incurring divine punishment simply by the act of sacking a city. I agree with Kovacs on these points and believe that his argument refutes the widely held view that in these lines Euripides is condemning on moral or religious grounds the sacking of cities in general.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧里庇得斯,特洛阿德斯95-7
波塞冬以这种对凡人愚蠢的反思来结束欧里庇得斯的《漫游记》的神圣序言。这篇文章是默里印刷的,在第95行末尾加了一个逗号,但迪格尔接受了佩奇的修改。我认为,阅读手稿是完全有意义的,因为它是好的希腊语,没有必要修改。D. Kovacs指出,这些诗句没有提到亵渎,因为把寺庙变成废墟与亵渎它们是完全不同的。此外,由于在希腊思想中通常假设城市可以被洗劫而不亵渎神灵,波塞冬评论的愚蠢之处并不在于胜利者仅仅通过洗劫城市的行为而招致神的惩罚。我同意科瓦奇的这些观点,并认为他的论点驳斥了一种广泛持有的观点,即欧里庇德斯在这些文字中是基于道德或宗教理由谴责洗劫城市的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antichthon
Antichthon CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANN volume 57 Cover and Back matter ANN volume 57 Cover and Front matter ‘Slogans’ on Coins in Julius Caesar's Dictatorship Years (49–44 BC) Panaetius, Scipio Aemilianus, and the Man of Great Soul Remembering Someone Else's Past: The Social Psychology of Odysseus’ Fake Autobiographies (Od. 14 and 19)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1