Applyng the concept of right: Fichte and Babeuf

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cbo9780511736131.003
J. David
{"title":"Applyng the concept of right: Fichte and Babeuf","authors":"J. David","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511736131.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the claim made by earlier interpreters of Fichte's political thought, such as Marianne Weber and Xavier Leon, that it contains a number of striking parallels with some of the main ideas associated with the French revolutionary communist Gracchus Babeuf. It is argued that once we understand what it means for Fichte to 'apply' the concept of right (Recht), and how this application relates in particular to his views on property, there appears to be some substance to Weber's and Leon's claims. This in turn speaks against a more recent tendency to locate Fichte's political thought in the liberal tradition; a tendency which the author shows does not pay sufficient attention to Fichte's ideas concerning the need to apply the concept of right and how this leads him to develop the economic proposals found in The Closed Commercial State, which contain a number of parallels with some of the doctrines attributed to Babeuf. The author does, however, point to some fundamental differences between Fichte's social and political thought and some of the main ideas associated with the revolutionary movement known as Babouvism. Yet these differences again speak against a liberal interpretation of Fichte's social and political thought.","PeriodicalId":51773,"journal":{"name":"HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/cbo9780511736131.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511736131.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article examines the claim made by earlier interpreters of Fichte's political thought, such as Marianne Weber and Xavier Leon, that it contains a number of striking parallels with some of the main ideas associated with the French revolutionary communist Gracchus Babeuf. It is argued that once we understand what it means for Fichte to 'apply' the concept of right (Recht), and how this application relates in particular to his views on property, there appears to be some substance to Weber's and Leon's claims. This in turn speaks against a more recent tendency to locate Fichte's political thought in the liberal tradition; a tendency which the author shows does not pay sufficient attention to Fichte's ideas concerning the need to apply the concept of right and how this leads him to develop the economic proposals found in The Closed Commercial State, which contain a number of parallels with some of the doctrines attributed to Babeuf. The author does, however, point to some fundamental differences between Fichte's social and political thought and some of the main ideas associated with the revolutionary movement known as Babouvism. Yet these differences again speak against a liberal interpretation of Fichte's social and political thought.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权利概念的运用:费希特和巴贝夫
这篇文章考察了早期对费希特政治思想的阐释者,如玛丽安·韦伯和泽维尔·莱昂所提出的主张,他们认为费希特的政治思想与法国革命共产主义者格拉古·巴贝夫的一些主要思想有许多惊人的相似之处。有人认为,一旦我们理解费希特“应用”权利概念(Recht)的意义,以及这种应用如何与他对财产的看法联系起来,韦伯和莱昂的主张似乎就有了一些实质内容。这反过来又反对最近将费希特的政治思想定位于自由主义传统的趋势;作者所表现出的一种倾向,并没有充分关注费希特关于应用权利概念的必要性的观点,以及这如何导致他在《封闭的商业国家》中提出的经济建议,这些建议与巴贝夫的一些学说有许多相似之处。然而,作者确实指出了费希特的社会和政治思想与被称为巴布主义的革命运动有关的一些主要思想之间的一些根本差异。然而,这些差异再次反对对费希特社会和政治思想的自由主义解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: History of Political Thought (HPT) is a quarterly journal which was launched in 1980 to fill a genuine academic need for a forum for work in this multi-disciplinary area. Although a subject central to the study of politics and history, researchers in this field had previously to compete for publication space in journals whose intellectual centres of gravity were located in other disciplines. The journal is devoted exclusively to the historical study of political ideas and associated methodological problems. The primary focus is on research papers, with extensive book reviews and bibliographic surveys also included. All articles are refereed.
期刊最新文献
Hobbes and the Perpetual Person of the State Leo Strauss, The Latin Averroists and the Eternity of the World Humboldt’s Individualism: Theorizing Social Individuality Rousseau, Franklin and Bourgeois Liberalism Machiavelli’s Warning: The Medici, Florence, Rome and New Princes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1