Visual analysis of multiple baseline across participants graphs when change is delayed.

Rebecca G. Lieberman, P. Yoder, B. Reichow, M. Wolery
{"title":"Visual analysis of multiple baseline across participants graphs when change is delayed.","authors":"Rebecca G. Lieberman, P. Yoder, B. Reichow, M. Wolery","doi":"10.1037/A0018600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A within-subjects group experimental design was used to test whether three manipulated characteristics of multiple baseline across participants (MBL-P) data showing at least a month delayed change in slope affected experts’ inference of a functional relation and agreement on this judgment. Thirty-six experts completed a survey composed of 16 MBL-P graphs. Graphs with steep slopes, once change began, were far more likely to be judged as showing a functional relation. Generally, experts disagreed with each other regarding functional relation judgments. Implications for the types of dependent variables that fit the requirements of MBL-P are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48005,"journal":{"name":"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY","volume":"25 1","pages":"28-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/A0018600","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/A0018600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

A within-subjects group experimental design was used to test whether three manipulated characteristics of multiple baseline across participants (MBL-P) data showing at least a month delayed change in slope affected experts’ inference of a functional relation and agreement on this judgment. Thirty-six experts completed a survey composed of 16 MBL-P graphs. Graphs with steep slopes, once change began, were far more likely to be judged as showing a functional relation. Generally, experts disagreed with each other regarding functional relation judgments. Implications for the types of dependent variables that fit the requirements of MBL-P are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当更改延迟时,对参与者图中的多个基线进行可视化分析。
使用受试者组内实验设计来测试显示至少一个月延迟斜率变化的参与者多基线(MBL-P)数据的三个操纵特征是否影响专家对函数关系的推断和对这一判断的一致性。36位专家完成了由16张MBL-P图组成的调查。一旦变化开始,具有陡峭斜率的图表更有可能被判断为显示了函数关系。专家们对功能关系的判断普遍存在分歧。对符合MBL-P要求的因变量类型的含义进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The flagship scholarly journal in the field of school psychology, the journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical analyses, and literature reviews encompassing a full range of methodologies and orientations, including educational, cognitive, social, cognitive behavioral, preventive, dynamic, multicultural, and organizational psychology. Focusing primarily on children, youth, and the adults who serve them, School Psychology Quarterly publishes information pertaining to populations across the life span.
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Cognitive Ability and Math Computation Developmental Relations With Math Problem Solving: An Integrated, Multigroup Approach Supplemental Material for Measuring Teacher Practices and Student Academic Engagement: A Convergent Validity Study Supplemental Material for Influence of Homogeneity of Student Characteristics in a Group-Based Social Competence Intervention Observer and Student Ratings of the Class Environment: A Preliminary Investigation of Convergence Protective Factor Screening for Prevention Practice: Sensitivity and Specificity of the DESSA-Mini
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1